Sunday, May 8, 2011

Govt's disinvestment kitty set to cross Rs 1 lakh crore mark!Land Acquisition Drive has to be accelerated with unprecedented Push for Economic Reforms and ethnic Cleansing! Greater Noida is an Indicator of the MONOPOLISTIC Aggression against EXCLUDED

Govt's disinvestment kitty set to cross Rs 1 lakh crore mark!Land Acquisition Drive has to be accelerated with unprecedented Push for Economic Reforms and ethnic Cleansing! Greater Noida is an Indicator of the MONOPOLISTIC Aggression against EXCLUDED Communities and Agrarian Rural India. Pranab`s Budget was an INTRODUCTION to the SECOND Phase of   LPG Mafia Raj! SEZ, PCPIR, Nuclear Power Plants, NIMZ,RETAIL Chain, INFRASTRUCTURE and Seond Green Revolution COMBINED means EXTENTION of NOIDA, PARADEP, KALINGNAGAR, Niyamagiri, SINGUR, NANDIGRAM, JAITAPUR, Jaitapur, LVASA, NAVI Mumbai, BARNAL and so on Countrywide. The US Prosponsered Democratic Movement led by Brahaminical CIVIL Society, Media, Intelligentsia and the HEGEMONY which  SUCCEED in COUP in Brahaminical Bengal as well all over the Nation, means BUSINESS, PROFIT and TOTAL Control on Market and Natural Resources!The Forces of CHANGE do SUPPORT the ECONOMIC Reforms, DISINVESTMENT, FDI Raj and Foreign Capital and the War against Corruption and Black Money is only Eyewashing! It is TOTAL Destruction for Man and NATURE!


Indian Holocaust My Father`s Life and Time - SIX HUNDRED THIRTY TWO

Palash Biswas

http://indianholocaustmyfatherslifeandtime.blogspot.com/

http://basantipurtimes.blogspot.com/

Govt's disinvestment kitty set to cross Rs 1 lakh crore mark!

Land Acquisition Drive has to be accelerated with unprecedented Push for Economic Reforms and ethnic Cleansing! Greater Noida is an Indicator of the MONOPOLISTIC Aggression against EXCLUDED Communities and Agrarian Rural India. Pranab`s Budget was an INTRODUCTION to the SECOND Phase of   LPG Mafia Raj! SEZ, PCPIR, Nuclear Power Plants, NIMZ,RETAIL Chain, INFRASTRUCTURE and Seond Green Revolution COMBINED means EXTENTION of NOIDA, PARADEP, KALINGNAGAR, Niyamagiri, SINGUR, NANDIGRAM, JAITAPUR, Jaitapur, LVASA, NAVI Mumbai, BARNAL and so on Countrywide. The US Prosponsered Democratic Movement led by Brahaminical CIVIL Society, Media, Intelligentsia and the HEGEMONY which  SUCCEED in COUP in Brahaminical Bengal as well all over the Nation, means BUSINESS, PROFIT and TOTAL Control on Market and Natural Resources!The Forces of CHANGE do SUPPORT the ECONOMIC Reforms, DISINVESTMENT, FDI Raj and Foreign Capital and the War against Corruption and Black Money is only Eye Washing! It is TOTAL Destruction for Man and NATURE!Meanwhile land Acquisition for POSCO Refreshed. Vedant got Green Signal. Jaitapur Nuclear Cluster goes ahead. Land Acquisition for Nuclear Plant in Haripur JUNAPUT in Bengal has to begin just after the Elections!

For the second consecutive day violent protests by farmers against forcible acquisition of their land continued in Greater Noida and spread to other parts of western-Uttar Pradesh including Agra and Aligarh. Farmers clashed with the police which saw four people dead even as protestors set on fire the offices of JP Infratech which is constructing the Yamuna Expressway from Noida to Agra. Economic Times Reports!I worked as a Professional Journalist in Wetsrn UP based in Meerut for SIX years during 1984 to 1990. I witnessed the KISAN Union Movement. I am also in constant Contact with JAAT ARAKSHAN SANGHARSHA Samiti. I had seen the merger of GREEN into the Jungle of CONCREET around New Delhi since SEVENTIES. I may guess the VOLUME of RESUISTANCE hereafter! But isolated Resistance has to be CRUSHED alike the the NAXAL AGRARIAN REVOLT countrywide, like Kashmir and entire Northeast under AFPSA until a NATIONAL Mass Movement of the ABORIGIN INDIGENOUS Humanscape is mobilised!

Meanwhile,the government's disinvestment proceeds from all its asset sales till date are set to cross the Rs one lakh crore milestone with its share sale in Power Finance Corp scheduled to hit the market later this week.

The Hindutva Forces consisting of RSS Family, India Incs, Media, Shankaracharyas, Sadhus led by Baba Ramdev and BRAHMIN Samaj UNITED Rock Solid to Manipulate MANDATE for Manmohan World Bank Washington Slaves Extraconstitutional Elements LPG Gangsters led UPA Governemnet and what awonder, Now BJP today said it would observe black day " in Uttar Pradesh tomorrow to protest the police crackdown on farmers in Greater Noida and demanded that immediate talks be held with the agitating peasants to address their genuine grievances!RSS Family demands US Like Military Action against Pakistan evoking Hindu Nationalism to Militarise the State Nation and Cover UP Monopolistic Corporate Aggression against ABORIGIN Humanscpe banking on War on Terror, Nuclear Realliance of Global Hindutva and Zionist forces led by US and ISRAEL!

It is a Mallika Shehrawat Act!

I'm the face of India in Hollywood--Mallika

Total Filmy - tarannum khan - ‎4 hours ago‎
The 'Hiss' actress Mallika Sherawat must be thanking her stars for fetching her the Hollywood flick 'Love Of Politics, Barack', as because of this film, she earned the privilege to meet the US President ...

Mallika Sherawat's got a US accent

Times of India - ‎7 hours ago‎
Have you spoken to Mallika Sherawat recently? She seems to have been bitten by the Western bug. Maybe rightly so! After all, she is happy to be the first Bollywood actress to have met Mr. President, Barack Obama, and that too, not once, but twice....

My life is like Obama's: Mallika

Times of India - Prithwish Ganguly - ‎May 6, 2011‎
Mallika Sherawat is back in India from the US. Yesterday she was shooting a dance number for her forthcoming film Double Dhamaal at Mehboob studios, Bandra. She was at her chatty and catty best. This is the Mallika we know and love. ...


Mallika said, "Society celebs and the so-called blue bloods of Bollywood are the only ones who have a problem with me. I think they can't stand the fact that I have made it without making any compromises."

more by Mallika Sherawat - 4 hours ago - Total Filmy (1 occurrences)




No takers for Mallika's Obama film

Times of India - Reshma Kelkar Dabholkar - ‎May 7, 2011‎
Despite Mallika Sherawat's personal meeting with Barack Obama, her film based on the US President finds no takers. It seems Mallika's high hopes to gain publicity for her film 'Politics of Love, Barack' has gone waste. The actress might have invited ...

Dud of the week

India Today - ‎May 7, 2011‎
Barack Obama met Mallika Sherawat, taking him to an all-time low and her to an all-time high. The starlet declared he was a "bomb." What's more, the Hisss star also hired local paparazzi to follow and record her every move. The population of India is...

Mallika is in a grave situation

Deccan Chronicle - Shama Bhagat - ‎20 hours ago‎
While Mallika Sherawat's upcoming film Politics of Love is creating a lot of buzz, there are reports that the film is in trouble even before its release. Sources say that no buyers are coming forward to take the film and that it may be headed towards a ...

Mallika Sherawat: 'I'm like Barack Obama'

Digital Spy - Steven Baker - ‎May 7, 2011‎
The actor, who recently met the US President at an event in Washington, said that they share similar backgrounds, The Times of India reports. "I feel that my life is the same as Obama's. I do not come from a filmic ...
All 7 related articles »

Farmer fury spreads to Agra; Noida death toll rises to 4

Hindustan Times - ‎1 hour ago‎

Farmers' fury over land takeover spread Sunday to Agra in Uttar Pradesh as the number of dead in clashes with security forces in Greater Noida rose to four, officials said. Angry farmers in Agra's Etmadpur tehsil went on a rampage on Sunday, ...

Video: Farmers' agitation spreads to Agra, Aligarh NewsX

Farmers'' unrest spreads to Agra; Noida toll rises to 4 IBNLive.com

Greater Noida continues to be tense after clash Business Standard

Economic Times - Times of India

all 176 news articles »

हिंदी मेंEmail this story

BJP condemns police firing on farmers

Times of India - ‎5 hours ago‎
NEW DELHI: BJP on Sunday condemned the police action against farmers in Greater Noida, accusing the Mayawati government for the incident and demanded that no agriculture land should be acquired till the pending legislation on the issue is passed. ...
Farmers' agitation spreads from G Noida to Agra SamayLive
Mayawati Govt Hand in Glove with Land Mafia: JD-U Outlook
all 14 news articles »Email this story

DGP says they will go after Tewatia

Times of India - Vandana Keelor, Ayesha Arvind - ‎17 hours ago‎
GREATER NOIDA: Around 3pm on Saturday, the exchange of fire began between PAC men and farmers. In Lucknow, DGP Karamveer Singh said that Tewatia and his men had called the families of the hostages to the village saying he would release them around 11 ...
UP govt. announces reward of Rs 50000 on Tewatia's arrest NetIndian
all 12 news articles »
हिंदी मेंEmail this story

DM, SSP out of danger

Hindustan Times - ‎May 7, 2011‎
District magistrate Deepak Aggarwal and senior superintendent of police SN Singh were shifted from the Kailash Hospital in Greater Noida to its Noida branch late on Saturday evening after doctors said they were out of danger. They are in the ICU. ...
DM, SSP have serious injuries, constable critical Indian Express
all 3 news articles »
हिंदी मेंEmail this story

3 dead, DM hurt in Greater Noida land stir

Times Now.tv - ‎12 hours ago‎
... leg when farmers agitating against land acquisition for Yamuna Expressway turned violent on Saturday. They fired at the police and other officials around 3 pm at Bhatta Parsaul village, some 25 km from Greater Noida, leading to a gun battle till 6 pm.

Pvt players may build Gr Noida Metro route

Times of India - ‎May 5, 2011‎
NOIDA: A day after the Greater Noida Authority said it was analyzing the Detailed Project Report submitted by DMRC for extending the Noida metro line up to Greater Noida, the two parties did not reach a compromise on the estimated cost of the project. ...

Greater Noida Metro work to start by Sept

Times of India - ‎May 4, 2011‎
GREATER NOIDA: Work on the proposed Metro link between Noida sector 32 and Greater Noida is expected to begin soon. Greater Noida Authority officials say that the Delhi Metro Rail Corporation has submitted its final Detailed Project Report and they are ...

Business Standard

<B>Q&A:</B> Soon H Kwon, LG Electronics India

Business Standard - ‎May 6, 2011‎

It has been just five months since Soon H Kwon occupied the corner office at LG's Greater Noidaheadquarters, near Delhi. He appears comfortable in his new role. The South Korean electronic giant plans to double India's contribution to its global ...

Business Today

Shiv Nadar University to be set up in Greater Noida

Economic Times - ‎Apr 27, 2011‎

NEW DELHI: The Shiv Nadar Foundation today said it will establish a university in Greater Noida to offer undergraduate, postgraduate and professional degrees across a number of disciplines. The Uttar Pradesh government has enacted the necessary ...

Tech tycoon Shiv Nadar to set up research-led university in Greater Noida Hindustan Times

Shiv Nadar University: for a new breed of knowledge warriors IBNLive.com (blog)

Shiv Nadar Foundation to set up university in Greater Noida Business Today

all 14 news articles »Email this story

Wheels Unplugged

Honda's production cut in India to last till July

Economic Times - ‎May 4, 2011‎

Honda Motor Co, which is present in India through a joint venture with the Siel Group, manufactures cars at a facility in Greater Noida in Uttar Pradesh that has an installed capacity to roll out one lakh units per year. "The supply situation is not ...

Honda Siel Cars sales fall 43.76% in April Business Standard

Sales of Vehicles in India Rise Modestly News Tonight

Honda Siel Cars India April vehicle sales down istockAnalyst.com (press release)

all 22 news articles »

TYO:7267Email this story

We won't miss any GP deadlines: Gaur

Times of India - Alok Sinha - ‎May 6, 2011‎
NEW DELHI: India's inaugural Formula One race is just five months away and hectic activity is on around the circuit -- named the Budh International Circuit -- in Greater Noida. With the bad experience of the Commonwealth Games still fresh in people's ...

Ex-MP's kin held for MLA murder

Times of India - ‎Apr 30, 2011‎
GREATER NOIDA: In a major breakthrough, the Uttar Pradesh STF (special task force) arrested ex-MP Ateeq Ahmad`s brother Khalid Azim alias Ashraf from Greater Noida area late night on Saturday. According to UP Police, Ashraf is the prime accused in the ...
Absconding ex-SP MLA arrested MSN India
all 8 news articles »Email this story

Student tries to loot auto driver, plan fails

Times of India - ‎May 4, 2011‎
GREATER NOIDA: A B.Tech student tried to loot an auto-rickshaw driver but instead landed in the police net in Bisrakh area in Greater Noida. The police have arrested the student. The incident came to light when an auto driver reached the Surajpur ...

Authority plans swanky public toilets

Times of India - ‎May 2, 2011‎
GREATER NOIDA: Following repeated complaints from the public, the Greater Noida Authority has finally taken upon itself to address the lack of public toilets and improve the deplorable condition of whatever few exist in the city....

Gzb-Gr Noida road work to be resumed

Times of India - Ayesha Arvind - ‎May 3, 2011‎
NOIDA: Work on the proposed link road between Ghaziabad and Greater Noida is finally set to take off after a delay of almost seven years. The Greater Noida Authority and the Ghaziabad Development Authority (GDA) claim to have reached a settlement over ...

7 get life term for Greater Noida murder

Times of India - ‎Apr 30, 2011‎
... four men in another Santro car overtook Kumar`s car, forcing him to stop. They pulled him out, took him to a forested area nearby and shot him dead. Kumar died of multiple bullet injuries after several hours, in a Greater Noida hospital.

Plan to roll out GPS-enabled, low-floor buses in Noida

Times of India - ‎Apr 30, 2011‎
The Noida Authority has now devised a special purpose vehicle (SPV) comprising itself, the Greater NoidaAuthority and UPSRTC to change the dismal public transport system within Noida and Greater Noida. According to UPSRTC Assistant Regional Manager ...

AIMT begins training of judicial officers

IBNLive.com - ‎May 2, 2011‎
PTI | 08:05 PM,May 02,2011 New Delhi, May 2 (PTI) Army Institute of Management and Technology (AIMT) today began training of the first batch of 30 judicial officers at its campus in Greater Noida. The six day-long training program is tailor made for ...
Uttar Pradesh judges to train at army management institute Mangalorean.com
all 5 news articles »Email this story

Hindon floodplains to be rid of encroachments, made into green belt

Times of India - Ayesha Arvind - ‎Apr 27, 2011‎
NOIDA: Alarmed at the continuous encroachment on the Hindon flood plains, the Noida Authority has finally decided to take matters in its own hands. The Noida and Greater Noida authorities will now acquire around 25 hectares of the floodplain area on ...

Mid-Day

Noida colleges to 'bounce out' troublemakers

Mid-Day - Amit Singh - ‎May 4, 2011‎

While institutes in Noida and Greater Noida are waiting for them with open arms, 'ammunition' has been kept ready to deal with mischief mongers, or overeager parents. Several colleges have hired bouncers and have instructed them to keep nuisance ...

Stock Markets Review

Earth Studios,New Project Earth Studios Greater noida,Greater Noida real Estate

Stock Markets Review - ‎22 hours ago‎

Earth studios is the appealing outcome of Earth infrastructure's mind in the much planned destination in Greater Noida. Earth infrastructure is about to launch a very satisfying projects at Plot No. 1, Tech Zone in Greater Noida. ...

Woman burnt to death for dowry in Greater Noida

Hindustan Times - ‎Apr 18, 2011‎
Meanwhile, 19-year-old Anju Devi allegedly tried to commit suicide by consuming poisonous pills in Noida. She was rushed to a private hospital, where her condition was said stable till late Monday evening.
Woman burnt to death in NOIDA Daily News & Analysis
all 3 news articles »Email this story

Man robbed, thrown off moving train

Times of India - ‎May 2, 2011‎
GREATER NOIDA: Close on the heels of the Arunima Sinha case, a 28-year-old marketing executive was robbed and thrown out of a moving train near Bodaki railway station in Dadri area on Sunday night. The victim was going to his native place Gorakhpur ...

Tag Heuer gets F1 track rights

mydigitalfc.com - Antara Ghosal - ‎45 minutes ago‎
To build their brand around motor racing, Tag Heuer has collaborated with JPSI, a Jaypee Group company, which constructed the 5.14-km-long world-class motor racing circuit — the Buddh International Circuit — near Greater Noida, to have access to the ...

Accident disrupts rail traffic

Times of India - ‎May 3, 2011‎
NEW DELHI: There was a disruption on the Delhi-Kanpur railway route after a tractor-trolley crashed into a goods train near Maripat in Greater Noida area. Railways officials said this led to piling up of trains for over four hours. At least 25 trains, ...

Rs 50000 reward announced for farmer leader

Times of India - ‎3 hours ago‎
GREATER NOIDA: The Uttar Pradesh government on Sunday announced a reward of Rs 50000 for the arrest of farmer leader Manvir Singh Teotia who has been blamed for violence over land takeover that left three dead. Protests by farmers resisting the ...

Traffic disrupted in Greater Noida

IBNLive.com - ‎Apr 22, 2011‎
PTI | 10:04 PM,Apr 22,2011 Greater Noida, Apr 22 (PTI) Traffic was today affected for nearly an hour on GT Road here after a crowd demonstrated against police high-handedness."A traffic policeman signalled the truck to stop at a crossing near Kotwali. ...
Traffic disrupted in GN SamayLive
all 2 news articles »Email this story

Manufacturing revs up as trade deficit looms

Reuters India - Matthias Williams, Lyndee Prickitt - ‎Apr 26, 2011‎
Slideshow A worker at LG Electronics India Pvt Ltd. checks television sets on an assemble line inside a factory atGreater Noida in Uttar Pradesh April 6, 2011. By Matthias Williams and Lyndee Prickitt GREATER NOIDA, India (Reuters) - India's rise as ...

BSP leader attacked in Greater Noida

IBNLive.com - ‎Apr 21, 2011‎
PTI | 11:04 PM,Apr 21,2011 Greater Noida, Apr 21 (PTI) Ruling BSP leader Mehandi Hasan was attacked by armed men in Dadri area, police said here today. Hasan, who was attacked late last night, today lodged an attempt to murder case against four named ...

Farmers, police clash in Greater Noida, 3 killed

Hindustan Times - ‎22 hours ago‎
A farmers' agitation that has been simmering since January exploded into full-blown violence in Greater Noida on Saturday. Agitating farmers took three government employees hostage and then engaged the police who came to their rescue in a gunbattle ...

After green nod, red signal ahead for Posco on land buy

Land acquisition has been a sensitive and thorny issue in the mineral-rich state, where domestic steel giant Tata Steel is still struggling to get adequate land for its project announced nearly seven years ago

Keshab Jena/PTI

Mumbai: Having got the green nod from the Union environment mfor its mega plant in Orissa, South Korean steel major Posco will now be bracing for the next big challenge for its $12-billion project - land acquisition.
Land acquisition has been a sensitive and thorny issue in the mineral-rich state, where domestic steel giant Tata Steel is still struggling to get adequate land for its project announced nearly seven years ago.
"The real protest will start now. We will decide the future course of our democratic struggle against the Korean project soon," Posco Pratirodh Sangram Samiti (PPSS) spokesperson Prashant Paikary told PTI over phone.
"It is a matter of concern that both the centre and state governments have deliberately overlooked the important issues raised by us on the illegalities committed in the forest and environment clearance process," the anti- displacement group's spokesperson said.
The environment ministry last week gave a final clearance to the 12-million tonne (MT) steel plant to be set by Posco in Jagatsinghpur district.
The $12-billion integrated steel, mining and port project in Orissa is the single largest foreign investment in India. The South Korean firm had signed an MoU for the project with the Orissa government in 2005.
"Both the centre and state have sacrificed everything for the sake of the project. Local people very much understood the real motive of the government," Praffula Samantra, a green activist and head of Loksakti Abhijan, a local group, said.
If they (the government or the company) have not acquired even an inch of land in the last six years, how do they think the green nod will help them to set up the plant now?", Samantra asked.
Tata Steel, which had signed an MoU with the Orissa government way back in November, 2004, for setting up a 6-MTPA integrated steel plant at the Kalinganagar Industrial Complex in Jajpur district, recently started limited construction work.
The multi-billion project ran into rough weather after 14 people were killed in police firing in January, 2006, while opposing the construction of the plant's boundary wall.
Orissa steel and mines Minister Raghunath Mohanty said, "We will soon start land acquisition at the proposed plant site. We do not think there will be any problem now onward for acquiring land for the Posco project."
The environment ministry granted approval to the project with certain conditions, one of which is that the company would not export raw material from the proposed plant.
Posco has hailed the decision and said it expects to renew its pact with the Orissa government for building the plant shortly and assured that iron ore will not be exported from the facility.
"We welcome the Centre's decision to grant us clearance and expect to renew our agreement shortly for the 12-million tonne (MT) plant with the Orissa Government that expired last year," Posco India Vice-President Vikas Sharan said.
Tags - Find More Articles On:READ MORE ARTICLES BY:

http://www.livemint.com/2011/05/08113443/After-green-nod-red-signal-ah.html?h=B

Anti-Posco brigade hit hard by defection of villagers

Business Standard - ‎1 hour ago‎

The anti-Posco movement in Dhinkia village in the heart of Posco project site has suffered a major blow as hundreds of villagers, who were agitating under the banner of Posco Pratirodha Sangram Samiti (PPSS), have switched their support to the ...

After green nod, red signal ahead for Posco on land buy Livemint

Orissa seeks Posco-India''s views IBNLive.com

Forces called in before Posco land acquisition Times of India

Indian Express - Calcutta Telegraph

all 38 news articles »

हिंदी मेंEmail this story

Korea Times

POSCO signs lithium deal in Chile

Korea Times - Kim Da-ye - ‎7 hours ago‎

POSCO Chairman Chung Joon-yang signed a preliminary deal with a Peruvian firm owning a lithium-rich salt lake in Chile Saturday to jointly develop the key metal for rechargeable batteries. The agreement allows POSCO's Research Institute of ...

Posco, Chile's Li3 Energy in lithium pact MarketWatch

POSCO seeks opportunity in South America The Korea Herald

all 6 news articles »Email this story

News Tonight

Posco may have to spend 20% more for India plant

Livemint - Ruchira Singh - ‎May 4, 2011‎

South Korean steel maker Posco's cost of building the proposed $12 billion (`53520 crore) plant in Orissa, India's biggest foreign investment, may have increased by as much as 20% because of delays in government approvals and high inflation, ...

Posco's Orissa project gets a leg up, finally Economic Times

Posco not to export iron ore Times of India

Orissa submitted fake documents for Posco nod: Activists Mangalorean.com

Financial Times (blog) - Indian Express

all 16 news articles »Email this story

Hindu Business Line

Orissa to restart land acquisition for Posco soon

Business Standard - ‎May 3, 2011‎

A day after the Union ministry of environment and forests (MoEF) granted Stage-II forest clearance for the Rs 54000-crore Posco project in Orissa, the state government has decided to swing to action on the land acquisition front. ...

Orissa prepares to resume land acquisition for Posco project The Hindu

Centre's nod to Posco ends wild speculations: Raghunath Mohanty Daily News & Analysis

Jairam Ramesh clears Posco project Times of India

Economic Times - Livemint

all 232 news articles »Email this story

Orissa yet to decide on ore-export clause for Posco Project

Economic Times - ‎May 5, 2011‎
DELHI/KOLKATA: Mineral-rich Orissa, which is poised to execute the country's largest FDI following recent environmental clearance to Posco, will have to resolve yet another issue when it renews the lapsed agreement with the Korean steel major. ...
Ministerial discomfort Sify
all 2 news articles »Email this story

Anti-Posco group to launch protest campaign

iNewsOne - ‎May 6, 2011‎
Bhubaneswar, May 6 (IANS) An anti-displacement group Friday alleged that the Orissa government and the union environment ministry had 'deliberately chosen to overlook' the issues raised by it regarding the Posco project and said it would launch a ...

Barricades re-erected to stop officials from entering Posco site

Times of India - ‎May 5, 2011‎
KENDRAPADA: The anti-land acquisition brigade on Thursday re-erected barricades at villages in the proposed site of the Posco steel project in Jagatsinghpur district to restrict the entry of officials into the area. The blockades at Nuagaon, Gobindpur, ...

Planning to have draft ready in six months for new National steel policy ...

Economic Times - ‎May 5, 2011‎
The environmental clearance to Posco has brought the steel industry in the limelight. The sector, which saw commitments of greenfield plants from players like ArcelorMittal, has progressed little due to land- acquisition problems. ...

Orissadiary.com

Odisha: Pro-Posco body hails Union environment minister Jairam Ramesh

Orissadiary.com - ‎May 5, 2011‎

Jagatsinghpur: The United Action Committee (UAC), a pro-Posco outfit, has praised Union environment and forests minister Jairam Ramesh for according forest clearance to the proposedPosco project. Expressing his deep gratitude, UAC president Anadi ...

POSCO war Zone - Dhinkia keeps its fingers crossed SteelGuru

Reading Jairam Ramesh Tehelka

INDIA/SOUTH KOREA: Revoke the illegal clearance to the POSCO project Asian Human Rights Commission News

all 4 news articles »Email this story

POSCO war Zone - Anti POSCO groups object to clearance to project

SteelGuru - ‎May 4, 2011‎
Local organizations and groups opposing the South Korean major POSCO's proposed mega steel project in Orissa's coastal Jagatsinghpur district have reacted strongly against the Union Environment and Forest Ministry's decision to grant final forest ...

BJP to observe black day tomorrow against crackdown on farmers

Economic Times - ‎1 hour ago‎
NEW DELHI: BJP today said it would observe black day " in Uttar Pradesh tomorrow to protest the police crackdown on farmers in Greater Noida and demanded that immediate talks be held with the agitating peasants to address their genuine grievances. ...

Farmer fury spreads to Agra; Noida death toll rises to 4

Hindustan Times - ‎1 hour ago‎
Farmers' fury over land takeover spread Sunday to Agra in Uttar Pradesh as the number of dead in clashes with security forces in Greater Noida rose to four, officials said. Angry farmers in Agra's Etmadpur tehsil went on a rampage on Sunday, ...

Greater Noida continues to be tense after clash

Business Standard - Virendra Singh Rawat - ‎1 hour ago‎
Greater Noida, near the national capital, continued to be tense today following yesterday's bloody clashes between police and land owners, which have claimed four lives, including two security personnel. The issue of land acquisition and compensation ...

UP agitation: Farmers protest continue on Day 2; four dead

Economic Times - ‎2 hours ago‎
LUCKNOW: For the second consecutive day violent protests by farmers against forcible acquisition of their land continued in Greater Noida and spread to other parts of western-Uttar Pradesh including Agra and Aligarh. Farmers clashed with the police ...

Farmers'' unrest spreads to Agra; Noida toll rises to 4

IBNLive.com - ‎2 hours ago‎
PTI | 08:05 PM,May 08,2011 Agra/Greater Noida, May 8 (PTI) Agitation over land acquisition today spread to Agra with farmers clashing with police and setting ablaze vehicles as the toll rose to four in violence-hit Greater Noida, where police announced...

Men missing from village after farmers' stir

IBNLive.com - ‎2 hours ago‎
New Delhi: It was a day of uneasy calm in Bhatta Parsaul village of Greater Noida on Sunday, a day after it had witnessed unprecedented violence leaving four dead and several injured when clashes broke out between farmers and the police over land ...

Farmers' unrest spread to Agra, toll at 4

indiablooms - ‎39 minutes ago‎
Greater Noida, May 8 (IBNS) The farmers' unrest against land acquisition spread to Agra in Uttar Pradesh on Sunday even as Greater Noida remained tensed and the death toll in the violence on Saturday rose to four. A day after two policemen and a...

2 cops killed in clashes with farmers in Greater Noida, 1 farmer also dead

Times of India - ‎May 7, 2011‎
PTI | May 7, 2011, 09.58pm IST GREATER NOIDA/LUCKNOW: Two policemen were among three persons killed and District Magistrate Deepak Agarwal got a bullet injury in fierce clashes that broke out in Greater Noida on Saturday between security personnel and ...

DGP blames farmer leader for Greater Noida trouble

Times of India - ‎18 hours ago‎
LUCKNOW: Holding farmer leader Manveer Singh Tevetia responsible for the violent clashes in Greater Noida, DGP Karamveer Singh said that the state government was not aware about the demands of Bhatta Parsaul village. I wish they had told us, ...

Farmers agitaiton: Violence in Agra over land acquisition, 4 injured

Times of India - ‎10 hours ago‎
PTI | May 8, 2011, 12.40pm IST AGRA/GREATER NOIDA: Farmers' unrest over land acquisition today spread to Agra, where protesters clashed with police and torched vehicles, even as the toll in Greater Noida violence climbed to four while UP police ...
All 49 related articles »

Related

Greater Noida
Uttar Pradesh
Mayawati
Agra
Farm and Agriculture

Timeline of articles

Number of sources covering this story
BJP to observe black day tomorrow against crackdown on farmers
‎1 hour ago‎ - Economic Times
Two cops, farmer killed in Gr Noida violence over land
‎20 hours ago‎ - Indian Express
Greater Noida hostage drama turns violent
‎May 7, 2011‎ - Times of India


Images

NDTV.com

The Hindu

SamayLive

Calcutta Telegr...

Deccan Herald

Tehelka

All India Radio

The Hindu

Indian Express

All related images »

Videos

Farmers' agitation spreads to Agra, Aligarh

NewsX  -  9 hours ago

Watch video



Greater Noida tense after farmers thrash 2 cops to death

NDTV.com  - 10 hours ago

Watch video



Greater Noida hostage drama ends

NewsX  -  May 7, 2011

Watch video



Farmers take three govt employees hostage in Greater Noida

NewsX  -  May 7, 2011

Watch video



All related videos »



The government may garner over Rs 1,100 crore from sale of its 5 per cent stake in PFC through a follow-on public offer (FPO). The process will also involve sale of 15 per cent fresh equity worth over Rs 3,300 crore, scheduled for May 10-13.

The proposed Rs 1,100-crore share sale in PFC would take the gross proceeds for the government from its various disinvestment exercises till date to about Rs 1,00,800 crore.

Currently, the total receipts stands at Rs 99,738.92 crore from the government's various disinvestment programmes, ever since they begun in the financial year 1991-92, as per the data available with the Department of Disinvestment .

PFC would be the first disinvestment for the current financial year 2011-12, while there have been only three fiscals -- 1993-94, 2006-07 and 2008-09 -- with no disinvestment receipts at all into the government coffers.

The government has currently lined up three public sector majors -- ONGC (likely in July), SAIL and Hindustan Copper Ltd -- among its forthcoming disinvestments.

The government has proposed an ambitious disinvestment target of Rs 95,000 crore from sale of shares in public sector companies over next three fiscals, including Rs 40,000 crore in the current fiscal.

This is despite the government not being able to meet its target of Rs 40,000 crore in the last fiscal, when total disinvestment proceeds stood at Rs 22,762.96 crore.

In 2010-11, the government carried out disinvestment in SJVN Ltd (Rs 1062.74 crore), Engineers India Ltd (Rs 959.65 crore), Coal India (Rs 15,199.44 crore), PowerGrid (Rs 3721.17 crore), MOIL (Rs 1,237.51 crore) and SCI (Rs 582.45 crore).

Presenting the budget for the current fiscal, Finance Minister Pranab Mukherjee had said that he intends to maintain the momentum on disinvestment in 2011-12 by raising Rs 40,000 crore.

Besides, the budget documents projected the disinvestment receipts at Rs 30,000 crore and Rs 25,000 crore in 2012-13 and 2013-14, respectively.

The gross disinvestment proceeds of Rs 99,738.92 crore till date includes Rs 81,673.90 crore through sale of minority shareholding in central public sector enterprises (CPSEs) and Rs 1,317.23 crore through sale of majority shareholding of one CPSE to another such undertaking.

Besides, it includes Rs 6,344.35 crore from strategic sales, Rs 6,398.27 crore from sale of residual shareholding in disinvested CPSEs/companies and Rs 4,005.17 crore from other disinvestment-related transactions.

On Sunday the violence spread to Agra and Aligarh even as the situation in villages on the periphery of Greater Noida continued to be tense, with reports of large number of men folk in the villages reported missing.

The fresh protests by farmers clearly indicates that the new land acquisition policy brought by the Mayawati government last year after similar agitation's has failed to click with farmers still reluctant to hand over their land for building of townships and expressways by business houses.

Trouble started in Bhatta Parsaul village of Greater Noida on Saturday when agitating farmers held three UP State Road Transport Corporation employees captive to protest against acquisition of their agricultural land. The situation turned violent when the police reached the spot to get the three government employees released.

Mishandling of the situation led to firing between the farmers group and the police which saw the District Magistrate of Gautambudh Nagar Deepak Agarwal being shot in the leg. Two police men and a farmer were also killed as both fought a pitched battle for several hours.

The police raided the houses of several villagers misbehaving with women and children and later allegedly torched several homes, which were seen burning through the night.

There were reports of womenfolk in the villages claiming that hundreds of men have been missing since Sunday night with no trace of their being in police custody.

Rashtriya Lok Dal Chief Ajit Singh while going to the village was arrested and later released after a few hours.

He said that the Mayawati government was forcibly acquiring land at lower rates to help corporate houses.

BJP general secretary Arun Jaitley said that there was no reason for the police to open fire on farmers. He said that the Mayawati government was unwilling to listen to the people and forcibly acquiring land.

On Sunday even as one more farmer succumbed to injury taking the total death toll to four, farmers anger spread to Agra and Aligarh through which the Yamuna Expressway of the JP group passes.

Villagers clashed with the police in Chaugan Garhi village and at a few other places in Agra in which three policemen were injured. The villagers torched the JCB machine, generator, vehicles and the camp office of JP Infratech set up at the construction site.

In Aligarh farmers near the Tappal village blocked the highway and protested against the state government.

The Special DGP, Brij Lal who rushed to Greater Noida on Sunday said that the protestors are not farmers and are instead armed anti social elements. The state government has declared a reward of Rs 50,000 for nabbing farmer leader Manveer Singh Tewatiya, who has been inciting the violent protests, according to Brij Lal.

Section 144 have been promulgated in Noida, Agra and other places of the state where farmers have started their agitation.

In a major policy shift, the Transport Ministry on Tuesday said it has fixed monthly monitorable targets for road building and will bid out all projects beginning August through e-tendering process to introduce greater transparency in the sector. It means large scale landacqisition for the Roads on which you may go provided you pay TOLL TAX!

"We are committed to ensuring greater transparency and accountability in the road sector. We have fixed month-wise monitorable targets for award of contracts worth about Rs 57,000 crore by January, 2012," Transport Minister CP Joshi said here while addressing his first press conference.

Joshi said the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) will award five projects for building 570 km in May at a cost of Rs 4,656 crore. Four projects worth over Rs 5,500 crore were awarded last month. Altogether 59 contracts totalling 7,994 km will be awarded by January, 2012. The months of July, August and October will see award for over 1,000 km each.

Meanwhile, ANAND Bazar Patrika reports that Land Acquisition for POSCO has to begin on 18th AFRESH despite resistance!

ওড়িশায় পস্কো প্রকল্পে জমি অধিগ্রহণ ফের শুরু ১৮ই

সংবাদসংস্থা • ভুবনেশ্বর

গামী ১৮ মে থেকেই পস্কোর প্রস্তাবিত ইস্পাত প্রকল্পের জন্য জমি অধিগ্রহণের কাজ ফের শুরু করবে ওড়িশা সরকার। কেন্দ্রীয় পরিবেশ মন্ত্রক পারাদীপের কাছে দক্ষিণ কোরীয় বহুজাতিক পস্কোর ওই ইস্পাত প্রকল্পে চূড়ান্ত ছাড়পত্র দেওয়ার পরই নতুন করে এই কাজ শুরু করছে রাজ্য।
জমি অধিগ্রহণের দায়িত্বে থাকা রাজ্য শিল্প পরিকাঠামো উন্নয়ন নিগমের সিএমডি প্রিয়ব্রত পট্টনায়ক এ কথা জানিয়ে বলেন, গত বছর যে স্থানে অধিগ্রহণ স্থগিত রাখা হয়েছিল, সেখান থেকেই ফের এই কাজ শুরু করা হবে। পাশাপাশি তাঁর দাবি, কাজ শুরুর এক মাসের মধ্যে তা শেষ হবে। নিগম, রাজ্যের মুখ্য সচিব বি কে পট্টনায়ক, জগৎসিংহপুর জেলা প্রশাসনের প্রতিনিধি এবং পুলিশের উচ্চপদস্থ কর্তাদের সঙ্গে আলোচনায় এই সিদ্ধান্ত নেওয়া হয়েছে।
জমি অধিগ্রহণের প্রক্রিয়াটি ফের শুরু করতে ইতিমধ্যেই পারাদীপের বিধায়ক এবং রাজ্যের কৃষিমন্ত্রী দামোদর রাউতের সঙ্গে দেখা করেছেন ভারতে পস্কোর সিএমডি গি উং সাং। রাউত জানান, এই কাজে স্থানীয় মানুষের সাহায্যও চেয়েছেন সাং। তবে, এ বার কোনও প্রতিরোধ ছাড়াই অধিগ্রহণ প্রক্রিয়াটি সম্পূর্ণ করা সম্ভব হবে বলে আশা প্রকাশ করেছেন রাউত। যদিও, ইতিমধ্যেই এর বিরোধিতায় ফের আন্দোলনে নামার হুমকি দিয়েছে পস্কো প্রতিরোধ সংগ্রাম সমিতি।
গত বছর প্রায় ১১ একর জমি অধিগ্রহণ করেছিল নিগম। যার মধ্যে ৯৬টি পানের বরজ রয়েছে। এ জন্য পান চাষিদের ইতিমধ্যেই ক্ষতিপূরণও দিয়েছে রাজ্য। প্রিয়ব্রতবাবুর দাবি, সরকারের জমিতে আইন বহির্ভূত ভাবে যে বরজগুলি তৈরি করা হয়েছিল, সেগুলি পুনরুদ্ধারে উদ্যোগী হয়েছেন তাঁরা। পাশাপাশি, এই ১১ একরের মধ্যে বেশ কিছু ভেড়িও রয়েছে বলে তাঁর দাবি। তবে, রাজ্যের মুখ্যমন্ত্রী নবীন পট্টনায়কের ঘোষণা অনুযায়ী, ঢিনকিয়া গ্রামের প্রায় ৩০০ একর ব্যক্তিগত জমি অধিগ্রহণ করা হবে না বলেই জানিয়েছেন প্রিয়ব্রতবাবু। এ দিকে, রাজ্য ও পস্কোর মধ্যে চুক্তির মেয়াদ শেষ হয়ে গিয়েছে প্রায় ১০ মাস আগে। ফলে, চুক্তি না-থাকায় জমি অধিগ্রহণ করলেও তা পস্কোর হাতে তুলে দিতে পারবে না রাজ্য। এ কথা জানিয়েও প্রিয়ব্রতবাবুর দাবি, পস্কোর হাতে তুলে দিতে না পারলেও, শিল্পের জন্য জমি অধিগ্রহণ করতেই পারেন তাঁরা।
অন্য দিকে, নতুন করে অধিগ্রহণের দিন ঘোষণার পরেই পস্কো প্রতিরোধ সংগ্রাম সমিতির পক্ষ থেকে জানানো হয়েছে, সংস্থাকে জমি দিলে আরও বৃহত্তর আন্দোলনের পথে হাঁটবেন তাঁরা। সংগঠনের প্রেসিডেন্ট অভয় সাহু জানান, ইতিমধ্যেই প্রস্তাবিত কারখানা এলাকার সাতটি গেটই বাঁশের দরজা দিয়ে ঘিরে দিয়েছে সংগঠনটি। তাঁদের পক্ষ থেকে জানানো হয়েছে, গ্রামের সমস্ত মহিলা, শিশু এবং বয়স্করা দিনরাত গেটগুলি পাহারা দেবেন। এমনকী, পুলিশ ও সরকারি কর্তাদেরও সেখানে ঢুকতে বাধা দেওয়া হবে। রাজ্য অধিগ্রহণ প্রক্রিয়ায় আইন ভাঙলে প্রয়োজনে আদালতেরও দ্বারস্থও হতে পারেন তাঁরা।
প্রসঙ্গত, গত বছরই জগৎসিংহপুরে পস্কোর প্রকল্পের জন্য জমি অধিগ্রহণ প্রক্রিয়া শুরু করে নিগম। কিন্তু এ ক্ষেত্রে বনাঞ্চল অধিগ্রহণ আইন লঙ্ঘন করা হয়েছে বলে একটি বিশেষ রিপোর্ট দেয় এন সি সাক্সেনা কমিটি। যার ভিত্তিতে এই প্রক্রিয়া বন্ধের নির্দেশ দেয় কেন্দ্রীয় বন ও পরিবেশ মন্ত্রক। এর পরই ২০১০-এর ৬ অগস্ট সেই কাজ বন্ধ রাখার কথা জানায় নিগম।
প্রায় ৫২ হাজার কোটি টাকা লগ্নিতে বার্ষিক ১ কোটি ২০ লক্ষ টন উৎপাদন ক্ষমতাসম্পন্ন ইস্পাত কারখানা গড়তে রাজ্যের সঙ্গে ২০০৫ সালে চুক্তি সই করে পস্কো। এ জন্য প্রাথমিক ভাবে প্রায় ৪,০০৪ একর জমি চিহ্নিত করেছিল সংস্থা, যার মধ্যে ২,৯০০ একরই বনাঞ্চল। কিন্তু তার পর থেকেই প্রকল্পটিকে নিয়ে তৈরি হয়েছে একের পর এক বিতর্ক। বনাঞ্চল অধিগ্রহণ এবং পরিবেশ সংক্রান্ত ছাড়পত্র না পাওয়ায় গত পাঁচ বছরে ধরেই আটকে রয়েছে কারখানা তৈরির কাজ। প্রথম পর্যায়ে ২০১০-এর মধ্যেই বছরে ৬ মেট্রিক টন ইস্পাত উৎপাদন ক্ষমতা সম্পন্ন কারখানা তৈরি হওয়ার কথা ছিল। কিন্তু জমি সমস্যা না-মেটায় কাজ শুরু করা সম্ভব হয়নি। শেষ পর্যন্ত গত সপ্তাহেই শর্তসাপেক্ষে জমির চরিত্র বদলে চূড়ান্ত ছাড়পত্র দেওয়ার কথা জানান কেন্দ্রীয় পরিবেশমন্ত্রী জয়রাম রমেশ। এর পরই নতুন করে জমি অধিগ্রহণে উদ্যোগী হল রাজ্য।

http://anandabazar-unicode.appspot.com/proxy?p=8bus1.htm


"These measures will help us achieve the target of building 20 km of roads a day," Joshi said, adding that about 10,000 km of roads will be taken for award of contracts in 2011-12 for ensuring minimum achievement of 7,300 km which has been decided as a target by Empowered Group of Ministers last month.

The Road Ministry earlier used to follow the pattern of yearly targets during Joshi's predecessor Kamal Nath . Besides, he said, " NHAI is going to take up three pilot projects, Vijayawada-Machlipatnam, Patna-Buxar and Silliguri-Goyakota-Purnea on e-tendering basis and all tenders beginning from August this year will be through e-tendering only".

The Minister informed that GIS-based satellites imagery is being used for planning and monitoring of national highways and NHAI will implement a pilot project of 1200 km covering country's far flung areas.

Pilot project will be part of updating the existing GIS and web based Road Information System (RIS) of 7,000 km which is available on NHAI website.

Elaborating transparency measures undertaken so far, Joshi said NHAI was on Facebook and the Ministry welcomed suggestions for reforms. So far over 30,000 users visited the Facebook account.

Also annual Pre-qualification of bidders has been introduced to cut delays in road projects . Besides, a committee has been constituted to carry forward the process of Electronic Toll Collection (ETC).

On Expressways, he said, planning for it has been intensified and his Ministry was in talks with stakeholders, including state governments for such projects including Delhi-Jaipur Expressway project.

Land Acquisition Act

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Land Acquisition Act of 1894 is a law in India and Pakistan that allows the government to acquire private land in those countries.

"Land Acquisition" literally means acquiring of land for some public purpose by government/government agency, as authorised by the law, from the individual landowner(s) after paying a government fixed compensation in lieu of losses incurred by land owner(s) due to surrendering of his/their land to the concerned government agency.

Contents

 [hide]

[edit]Purpose of Land Acquisition Act

The land acquisition act of 1894 was created with the expressed purpose of facilitating the government's acquisition of privately held land for public purposes. The word "public purpose", as defined in the act, refers to the acquisition of land for putting up educational institutions or schemes such as housinghealth or slum clearance, apart from the projects for rural planning or formation of sites. The word "government" refers to the central government if the purpose for acquisition is for the union and for all other purposes it refers to the state government. It is not necessary that all the acquisition has to be initiated by the government alone. Local authoritiessocieties registered under the societies registration act, 1860 and co-operative societies established under the co-operative societies act can also acquire the land for developmental activities through the government.

[edit]History of Land Acquisition Act

Regulation I of the land acquisition act was first enacted by the British government in the year 1824. Its application was throughout the whole of the Bengal provinces immediately subject to the Presidency of Fort William. The rules empowered the government to acquire immovable property at, what was deemed to be, a fair and reasonable price for construction of roadscanals or other public purposes. In 1850 some of the provisions of regulation I of 1824 were extended to Calcutta through Act I of 1850, with a view to confirm the land titles in Calcutta that were acquired for public purposes. At that time a railway network was being developed and it was felt that legislation was needed for acquiring land for the purposes of the railways. Building act XXVII of 1839 and act XX of 1852 were introduced to obviate the difficulties pertaining to the construction of public buildings in the cities of Bombay and Madras. Act VI of 1857 was the first full enactment, which had application to the whole of British India. It repealed all previous enactments relating to acquisition and its object. Subsequently act X of 1870 came in to effect which was further replaced by land acquisition act 1894, a completely self contained act, in order to purge some of the flaws of act X of 1870.

After independence in 1947, the Indian government adopted "Land Acquisition Act-1894" as a tool for land acquisition. Since then variousamendments have been made to the 1894 act from time to time. Despite these amendments the administrative procedures have remained same.

[edit]Content of the Legislation

[edit]Notification

The process of acquisition begins with the issuance of preliminary notification, as envisaged under section 4(1) of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The notification has to be essentially published in the official gazette and in two daily newspapers circulating in that locality of which at least one shall be in the regional language. Further, it is also necessary that the notification has to be affixed in conspicuous places of that locality.

[edit]Filing of objections

The main objective of issuing preliminary notification is to call for objections, if any, against such acquisitions from the owners or others who are having certain interest over the property; giving them an opportunity to raise their claims against the move of the government for acquiring their lands. The persons aggrieved by such notification shall file their objections within thirty days from the date of preliminary notification(date of the publication of notification).

[edit]Final declaration

After receipt of objections, the concerned authority shall consider those objections, and if found unsatisfactory, then a final declaration rejecting the claims will be issued. Section 6 of the amended Act provides that the final declaration shall be issued by the authority within a period of one year from the date of issuance of preliminary notification under section 4(1) of the Act. However, prior to the amendment, the time stipulated under the Act for final declaration was three years from the date of publication of the preliminary notification. The final declaration has to be published as required under section 6(2) of the Act.

[edit]Award

Section 11 of the Act provides that after receiving the objections, the authority will have to hold an enquiry. However, it is necessary that actual extent of land proposed to be acquired and the value of the land has to be assessed before starting the enquiry, as required under sections 8 and 9 of the statute. On completion of the enquiry, award will be passed to that effect and published by the competent authority. After passing the award, the Collector or the Deputy Commissioner shall send notice to the owners or their representatives who were not present personally at the time of passing of the Award.

[edit]Time limit

Once the enquiry is concluded, it is the duty of the competent authority to pass the award within two years from the date of publication of the declaration under section 6, as envisaged under section 11 A of the Act. If the authority fails to adhere to the time schedule prescribed under the Act, the entire proceedings initiated for land acquisition will lapse. After passing of the award, the Deputy Commissioner or any other competent authority may take possession of the land immediately, which shall thereupon vest absolutely with the government, free from all claims, whatsoever.

[edit]Special powers

Section 17 of the Act confers special powers with the concerned authority wherein passing of award may be dispensed with and yet permits to take possession of the land notified for acquisition. Further holding of enquiry can also be waived, as envisaged under section 5 A of the Act. However, such powers can be exercised only in case of urgency. After passing of the award, the person whose land has been proposed to be acquired can give his consent for such acquisition and agree to receive the compensation.

Objections can also be raised against the measurement of the land, enhancement of compensation or apportionment of the compensation by filing a written application before the Deputy Commissioner, as provided under section 18 of the Act, requesting the authority to refer the matter to the court for determination of the grounds raised in the application. An application to that effect has to be filed by the person who was personally present when the award was passed, within six weeks from the date of the award passed by the Collector. In other cases, the application will have to be made within six weeks from the date of receipt of the notice issued under section 12(2) or within six months from the date of the award passed by Deputy Commissioner, whichever is earlier.

[edit]Compensation

Provision for settlement of dispute pertaining to apportionment of the compensation amount is available under section 30 of the Act. In such a situation, the Deputy Commissioner should refer the matter to the court. The claimant will be entitled to the compensation which is determined on the basis of the market value of the land determined as on the date of preliminary notification. According to section 34, if there is delay in payment of compensation beyond one year from the date on which possession is taken, interest at the rate of 15 per cent per annum shall be payable from the date of expiry of the said period of one year on the outstanding amount of compensation till the date of payment.

Judicial Interpretation of the word "Dispute" in the land acquisition proceedings—State of Madras Vs. B.V. Subramania Iyer AIR 1962 Mad. 313- The Word "Dispute"- Includes any controversy with regard to the title of a single claimant- The word 'dispute' has been used in a wide and not in a literal sense and implies any controversy at to title, whether as between the actual claimants, or as appearing from the documents made available by the government. It is obvious that when the government exercises its power of eminent domain and acquires property, Public funds have to be utilized for the payment of compensation to the true owner, and not merely to any claimant who cares to appear on the scene. The government has a special responsibility in this regard, and cannot later take refuge behind the pretext that the compensation was paid to the claimant who actually appeared wile others did not appeared. So long as that is the situation the acquiring officer has a right to make such a reference, even if a dispute or controversy as to the arises on the documents before him. He cannot be made liable for costs, and it is the party who has to bear the costs incurred in establishing the title, of the party to receive the compensation amount.

Status of the Tenant occupying the land to be acquired under Land Acquisition Act, 1894—M/s Indarprastha Ice and Cold Storage Ltd. Vs. Union of India AIR 1987 Del 171- Tenant is entitled to only a nominal compensation- Only a nominal portion of the compensation of the acquired land is to be paid to the tenant and substantial amount has to be taken by the landlord. The tenant is not entitled to 1/3 or 1/4 of the amount of compensation on the basis of judicial decisions relating to agricultural land on which the tenant had aright to purchase under Section 18 of the Punjab Security of Land Tenures Act. The tenant is only entitled to 1/8 share of the compensation

The government, under section 16 of the Act is at liberty to withdraw from acquisition of land except in cases provided under section 36. However, if the possession of land has been taken, then the government will have no authority to withdraw from such acquisition.

[edit]Procedure for the Land Acquisition

[edit]1. Investigation

  • When a local authority or a company requires a land, an application is required to be made by it to the revenue authority.
  • The application should be accompanied with a copy of the plan showing survey nos., purpose of acquisition and the reason for the particular site to be chosen and the provision made for the cost of the acquisition.
  • After the government has been fully satisfied about the purpose, the least area needed, and other relevant facts as provided under land acquisition rules, it will issue a notification under Section 4 of the act that the particular land is required for public purpose.
  • One of the revenue officers is appointed as the collector to hold an inquiry under Section 5-A of the Act.
  • After notification the owner is prohibited from selling his property or disposing of it and prevented from carrying out any works of improvements for which no compensation will be paid if executed without prior permission from the collector.

[edit]2. Objection and Confirmation

  • Objections are invited from all persons interested in land within thirty days from the date of notification.
  • The objections will be valid on one or more of the following grounds:
    • i. That the purpose for which the land is proposed for acquisition is not a public purpose.
    • ii. That the land is not or less suitable than another piece of land for the said purpose.
    • iii. That the area under acquisition is excessive.
    • iv. That the acquisition will destroy or impair historical or artistic monuments or will desecrate religious buildings, graveyards and the like.
  • The collector after hearing the objections will submit his report to the government who will finally declare the land for acquisition under the Section 6 of the Act.
  • After notification the collector proceeds with the claim. He has the site marked out, measured and a plan of the same is made.

[edit]3. Claim and Award

  • The collector will issue notices under Section 9 to all persons interested in the acquisition to file their claim reports.
  • The collector is not to be a party to the proceedings, is to possess an expert knowledge on valuation, and offers a fair price to an owner and checks that the public funds are not wasted.
  • The claim filed should contain the names of the claimants and co-shares if any rents or profits for last three years and a valuation report of the land from an architect or an engineer.
  • The government can abandon the acquisition proceedings by simply canceling the notification. However, in that case compensation has to be paid under Section 48(2).
  • In determining the compensation the market value of the land is determined at the date of notification. The rise and fall in the value during the period of transaction and notification is taken into consideration.
  • Compensation is also payable when:
    • i. Part of the property is proposed for acquisition in such a manner that the remainder depreciates in value.
    • ii. When the land notified for acquisition has standing crops or trees.
    • iii. If the person interested has to change his place of residence or business then the excess rent payable for the new premises is also considered for compensation.
  • Matters which are not taken into consideration for the purpose of land acquisition are:
    • i. The degree of urgency which has led to the acquisition.
    • ii. Any disinclination of the person interested to part with the land.
    • iii. Any increase in the land value likely to accrue from the use to which it will be put when acquired.
  • • After necessary inquiries the collector declares his award showing true area of the land, total amount of compensation payable and apportionment of compensation if there are more than one owners or claimants.
  • The collector has to make the award under section 11 within a period of two years from the date of notification.

[edit]4. Reference to Court

  • Any person interested to whom the award is not satisfactory can submit a written application to the court.
  • This application should be made within six weeks from the date of declaration of the award.

[edit]5. Apportionment

  • In apparent of the compensation each of the claimants are entitled to the value of his interest, which he has lost, by compulsory acquisition.
  • Thus it is required to value a variety of interest, rights and claims in the land in terms of money.

[edit]Authorities and agencies involved

The procedure involved for acquisition of land for companies are dealt with under chapter VII of the act, which requires an agreement to be entered into by the company with the appropriate government and the same has to be published in the official gazette. The government cannot initiate acquisition proceedings without issuing proper notice to the owners in any of the prescribed mode of service provided under the act and provide them sufficient opportunity. If any of the provisions envisaged in the act is violated or mandatory procedures are not followed, then the entire acquisition proceedings would become void.

[edit]Criticism

The Land Acquisition act has been criticized by groups that view the act as weak and ineffective, and by groups that view the act as draconian. People who feel that act is weak argue that the procedure followed is cumbersome and costly, often resulting in inordinate delay in land acquisition. This group argues that, the determination of public purpose should be matter of executive discretion and should not be contestable at law. It has also been argued that the property valuation techniques are flawed and that the land owners get to peg the value higher than the real value, based on 'potential value' and 'opportunity value' of their property; resulting in, what is claimed as, a heavy strain on public finances and restrictions on the scale of development and redevelopment projects. There is also opposition to the additional payment of solatium to landowners over the property value.

People who argue that the act is draconian claim that a number of projects with no public purpose attached, as in the case of SEZs, usurped land from property owners, with the help of the Land Acquisition Act, at what is claimed as, well below the market value of these properties. It is argued that, even in the case of projects that are genuinely for public purposes, there is a considerable difference between the market value of the property and the value that the land acquisition officer pays the land owners. It is also argued that the relocation and rehabilitation of land owners displaced by the actions of the act, is not followed up adequately, and that this is not covered comprehensively in the framework of the act. A notable instance of opposition to land acquisition, through the land acquisition act, is the Nandigram violence incident.

It is for this reason that government has proposed further amendments in the Act to strict define the purposes for which land could be acquired. If the Amendments get through, the provisions of the Act could be invoked only in limited conditions.There are some suggestion by various commission in different states, to provide rehabilitation for whom evicted from their own land. The land acquisition (kerala amendment) bill proposed by Justice V.R Krishna Iyer Committee submitted on 26 January 2009 is an example. It is in the consideration of Kerala Government till the date.

[edit]Other countries

  • Australia - New South Wales [1]

[edit]See also

[edit]References

[edit]External links


7 MAY, 2011, 04.02AM IST, DEVIKA BANERJI,

Labour reform slips out of list as India Inc has greater worries

NEW DELHI: Archaic labour laws are not affecting India's manufacturing sector as much as problems related to land, water, licences and clearances, a government panel's study shows.

With the findings of the Planning Commission study, changing rigid labour laws, so far suspected to be the main hurdle before the manufacturing sector, is likely to drop on the government's list of priorities. The sector contributes 15% to India's GDP.

"Against popular perception, we have found that archaic and rigid labour laws are not among the top three problems faced by the manufacturing sector," a Planning Commission official said.

The report is a conclusion of surveys conducted by the commission ahead of the formulation the 12th Five-year Plan to identify issues hampering growth of the manufacturing sector.

The 12th Plan begins in 2012. The commission has formed 10 working groups to help in effective policy-making for the plan period. The working groups, which will look into various issues including labour reforms, are expected to submit their reports by November.

The report says that high transaction costs because of multifarious clearance and licence norms, availability of land and water, and environment clearances are bleeding the manufacturing sector more than old labour laws. To address the concerns of companies, one working group will explore the possibility of having single-window clearances for building manufacturing plants. At present, an average of 20 clearances are required.

On labour management and laws, the report says that most companies are recruiting labour on contract, besides providing conducive work environment and better benefits. Another reason cited for the smaller role of labour laws is the increasing contribution of technology in manufacturing.

"Labour constitutes only 10 % of a manufacturing plant, 90% are other components. Therefore, industries have such a perspective.

There is increased mechanisation, and that is necessarily not in the interest of the country," said Ravi Wig , president of the Employers Federation of India . Labour reforms would continue to be important, Wig added. For the industry too, labour reforms continue to be as important as the setting up of a single-window clearance system.

"Both are required, one for setting a plant and the other for running it smoothly," said BP Pant, head of labour, employment and skills development department in the Federation of Indian Chambers of Commerce and Industry.

Pant said labour laws are tilted towards workers and do not facilitate job creation, or cater to the evolving needs of the consumer-centric manufacturing and services sectors.

However, the Planning Commission official said a greater responsibility lay with the companies. "There are things beyond laws."

The Planning Commission's approach paper to the 12th Plan has stated the need to create 100 million jobs by 2020-25, which will help raise the manufacturing sector's contribution to the GDP to 25 %.

Another working group of the commission will identify ways to make manufacturing competitive and quality conscious.

"All this is intended to create jobs, and therefore, new labour laws are essential for a smooth sail. What our study shows is that companies and states have found an alternative way through effective industrial relations management," the official added.

Labour law reforms are part of the draft manufacturing policy prepared by the industry ministry and the national strategy for manufacturing prepared by the National Manufacturing Competitiveness Council .

How to get your own unique identity number

*
Text courtesy: IANS

With a mammoth exercise on to issue an Aadhar number to each of India's 1.2 billion citizens and interested residents, here is a look at the process involved for getting what will become a unique identity for people in India to access all public or private services.

The Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) - under the chairmanship of Nandan Nilekani - is the nodal agency, which had appointed registrars across the country to facilitate the enrolment process.

Nilekani was one of the co-founders and previously headed IT bellwether Infosys. He enjoys cabinet rank in his present status.

http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/quickiearticleshow/8197161.cms
People in News
$1-mn house that 'Bhai' wants in Gurgaon
A real estate agent in Gurgaon got a call this week, asking for a home that's valued at least at a million US dollars.

জমি আন্দোলনে উত্তাল নয়ডায় হত তিন

পণবন্দিদের ছাড়াতে গিয়ে আক্রান্ত পুলিশ, দু'পক্ষে গুলিযুদ্ধ

নিজস্ব সংবাদদাতা • নয়াদিল্লি

মি আন্দোলনকে হাতিয়ার করে পশ্চিমবঙ্গে যখন 'পরিবর্তনের ঝড়' তুলেছেন তৃণমূল নেত্রী মমতা বন্দ্যোপাধ্যায়, ঠিক তখনই অধিগ্রহণ প্রশ্নে উত্তাল হয়ে উঠল উত্তরপ্রদেশ। ঘটনাচক্রে সেই রাজ্যেও নির্বাচন শিয়রে। এবং স্বাভাবিক ভাবেই আজকের ঘটনাকে কেন্দ্র করে মুখ্যমন্ত্রী মায়াবতীর বিরুদ্ধে আসরে নেমে পড়ছেন তাঁর বিরোধীরা।
শনিবারের ঘটনার কেন্দ্রস্থল খাস রাজধানী দিল্লির উপকণ্ঠ গ্রেটার নয়ড়া। আন্দোলনরত কৃষকদের সঙ্গে সংঘর্ষে সেখানে আজ দুই পুলিশের মৃত্যু হয়েছে। মারা গিয়েছেন এক জন গ্রামবাসীও। আহত হয়েছেন জেলাশাসক ও পুলিশ সুপার-সহ অনেক সরকারি কর্মচারী। আন্দোলনকারীদের তরফেও জখমের সংখ্যা কম নয়।
যমুনা এক্সপ্রেসওয়ে নির্মাণের জন্য যে দরে জমি নিচ্ছে উত্তরপ্রদেশ সরকার তার প্রতিবাদে গত কয়েক মাস ধরেই ধর্না চালাচ্ছেন গৌতম বুদ্ধ নগর জেলার চাষিরা। গত কাল নতুন বাস রুট চালু করার ব্যাপারে খোঁজখরব নিতে গেলে উত্তরপ্রদেশ রোডওয়েজের তিন কর্মচারীকে আটক করে রাখেন ভাট্টা পারসৌল গ্রামের বাসিন্দারা। পুলিশ, দাঙ্গা-বিরোধী বাহিনী এবং প্রভিন্সিয়াল আর্মড কনস্টিব্যুলারির (পিএসি) জওয়ানরা আজ তাঁদের উদ্ধার করতে গেলে গ্রামবাসীরা বাধা দেন। শুরু হয় সংঘর্ষ। নিরাপত্তা বাহিনী কাঁদানে গ্যাস ছুড়লে আন্দোলনকারীরা লাঠিসোঁটা এবং পাথর নিয়ে পাল্টা আক্রমণ চালান। উত্তেজিত জনতাকে ছত্রভঙ্গ করতে পুলিশ শূন্যে গুলি ছুড়লে তারাও পাল্টা গুলি চালায়। সংঘর্ষ চলে বেশ কয়েক ঘণ্টা।
*

গৌতম বুদ্ধ নগরের গুলিবিদ্ধ জেলাশাসক দীপক অগ্রবালকে

(ডান দিকে) সরিয়ে নিয়ে যাচ্ছে পুলিশ। — পি টি আই

আন্দোলনকারীদের আক্রমণে আহত হন পিএসি-র দুই জওয়ান। হাসপাতালে নিয়ে গেলে তাঁদের মৃত বলে ঘোষণা করা হয়। তাঁদের শরীরে গুলির আঘাত রয়েছে বলে হাসপাতাল সূত্রে জানা গিয়েছে।
আহত হয়েছেন গৌতম বুদ্ধ নগরের জেলাশাসক দীপক অগ্রবাল। তাঁর পায়ে গুলি লেগেছে। জেলার বরিষ্ঠ পুলিশ সুপার সূর্যনাথ সিংহও পাথরের ঘায়ে আহত। দু'জনেই আইসিইউ-তে চিকিৎসাধীন। এঁরা ছাড়াও দু'জন ডেপুটি সুপার, এক জন ম্যাজিষ্ট্রেট এবং পাঁচ জন পিএসি জওয়ান আহত হয়েছেন। তবে গ্রামবাসীদের হাতে বন্দি উত্তরপ্রদেশ রোডওয়েজের এক ড্রাইভার ও অন্য দুই কর্মচারীকে শেষ পর্যন্ত উদ্ধার করা গিয়েছে বলে খবর।
গ্রেটার নয়ডা থেকে আগরা পর্যন্ত ১৬০ কিলোমিটার দীর্ঘ ৬ লেনের যমুনা এক্সপ্রেসওয়ে তৈরির পরিকল্পনা করেছে উত্তরপ্রদেশের মায়াবতী সরকার। এই প্রকল্পের জন্য অধিগৃহীত প্রতি বর্গমিটার জমির দাম দেওয়া হচ্ছে ৮৮০ টাকা। কিন্তু আরও বেশি ক্ষতিপূরণের দাবিতে জানুয়ারি মাসের ১৭ তারিখ থেকে আন্দোলন করছেন গৌতম বুদ্ধ নগর জেলার চাষিরা। তাঁদের দাবি বর্গমিটার পিছু ৩০০০ টাকা করে দিতে হবে। সেই সঙ্গে বিকল্প জমি ও চাকরি। চাষিদের অভিযোগ, সরকার তাঁদের সামান্য ক্ষতিপূরণ দিয়েছে। অথচ যে বেসরকারি সংস্থা এই প্রকল্প করছে, অনেক বেশি দাম নিয়ে তাদের সেই জমি বিক্রি করা হয়েছে। এই বাড়তি আয়ের আশি শতাংশ দাবি করছেন আন্দোলনকারীরা। সঙ্গে রয়েছে প্রকল্পের জমির ২৫ শতাংশ জমিদাতা চাষিদের ব্যবহারের জন্য সংরক্ষিত রাখার দাবিও।
অন্য দিকে উত্তরপ্রদেশ সরকারের বক্তব্য, কৃষকদের ইতিমধ্যেই যথেষ্ট ক্ষতিপূরণ দেওয়া হয়েছে। তবু কিছু কায়েমি স্বার্থ তাঁদের বিভ্রান্ত করে প্রশাসনের উপরে চাপ বাড়াচ্ছে। চাষিদের দাবি 'অযৌক্তিক' হলেও আলোচনার মাধ্যমে সমস্যা মেটানোর ডাক দেওয়া হয়েছিল। কিন্তু আন্দোলনকারীরা তাতে কর্ণপাত করেননি। উল্টে পরিবহণ কর্মীদের পণবন্দি করে রেখেছেন। প্রশাসনের অভিযোগ, এর আগেও সরকারি-বেসরকারি বেশ কিছু কর্মীকে এই ভাবে পণবন্দি করে রাখা হয়েছিল। আজ তিন পণবন্দিকে উদ্ধারে যাওয়া পুলিশের উপরে আন্দোলনকারীরাই প্রথম গুলি চালান বলে মায়াবতী সরকারের অভিযোগ।
আজকের ঘটনা এক দিকে যেমন এ দেশে জমি আন্দোলনে নতুন মাত্রা জুড়েছে, তেমনই একে কেন্দ্র করে স্বাভাবিক ভাবেই শুরু হয়ে গিয়েছে রাজনৈতিক চাপানউতোর। তার একটা কারণ অবশ্যই উত্তরপ্রদেশে আসন্ন বিধানসভা নির্বাচন। পাঁচ রাজ্যের ভোটপর্ব শেষ হলেই উত্তরপ্রদেশের ময়দানে ঝাঁপিয়ে পড়তে উদগ্রীব রাজনৈতিক দলগুলি। এই অবস্থায় গ্রেটার নয়ডার জমি আন্দোলন মায়াবতীর বিরোধীদের হাতে নতুন অস্ত্র তুলে দিল। উত্তরপ্রদেশ প্রদেশ কংগ্রেস সভানেত্রী রীতা বহুগুণা জোশী মুখ্যমন্ত্রীর তীব্র সমালোচনা করে বলেছেন, "মায়াবতীর নিজের জেলাতেই নামমাত্র দাম দিয়ে চাষিদের জমি কেড়ে নেওয়া হচ্ছে। প্রতিবাদ করলে তাদের গুলি করে মারা হচ্ছে। এটা ডাকাতদের সরকার, জমি লুঠ করা যার অন্যতম পছন্দের বিনোদন। মায়াবতীর উপরে রাজ্যের মানুষের আর বিন্দুমাত্র আস্থা নেই।"
ময়দানে নেমে পড়েছে বিজেপি-ও। তবে মায়াবতীর পাশাপাশি তাদের লক্ষ্য কংগ্রেসও। বিজেপি-র রাজ্য সভাপতি সূর্যপ্রতাপ শাহির অভিযোগ, এক বেসরকারি সংস্থাকে সুবিধা পাইয়ে দিতেই কৃষকদের কম ক্ষতিপূরণ দেওয়া হয়েছে। এই সংস্থায় রয়েছেন কমনওয়েলথ-কাণ্ডে ধৃত, সাসপেণ্ড হওয়া কংগ্রেস নেতা সুরেশ কলমডীর ছেলে ও জামাই।
ঘটনার উপরে নজর রাখছে কেন্দ্রীয় সরকার। মনমোহন সিংহ সরকারের এক শীর্ষ সদস্যের মতে, গ্রেটার নয়ডার আজকের ঘটনা নতুন নয়। এর আগেও সাত বার সেখানে পুলিশ ও কৃষকদের মধ্যে সংঘর্ষ হয়েছে।এই ধরনের ঘটনা এড়াতেই শতাব্দী-প্রাচীন জমি অধিগ্রহণ আইন পাল্টাতে চায় কেন্দ্র। কিন্তু সেই বিলের খসড়া তৈরি হয়ে গেলেও মূলত তৃণমূল নেত্রী মমতা বন্দ্যোপাধ্যায়ের আপত্তিতেই তা আটকে রয়েছে। বেসরকারি সংস্থার জন্য জমি অধিগ্রহণে সরকারের ভূমিকা কী হবে, তা নিয়েই প্রশ্ন তুলেছেন তিনি। মমতার দাবি, এ ক্ষেত্রে সরকার এক ছটাকও জমি নিতে পারবে না। কিন্তু জমি আন্দোলনের 'জোরে' মমতা যখন পশ্চিমবঙ্গে ক্ষমতা দখলের আশা করছেন, তখন সময়োপযোগী আইনের অভাবে দেশের অন্যত্র জমি অধিগ্রহণ প্রক্রিয়া মসৃণ করা যাচ্ছে না বলেই কেন্দ্রীয় সরকারের একাংশের অভিমত। এই পরিস্থিতিতে বিজেপি আজ দাবি তুলেছে, জোটধর্মের বাধ্যবাধকতায় আটকে না-থেকে সরকারের উচিত বিলটি দ্রুত সংসদে পেশ করা।

http://anandabazar-unicode.appspot.com/proxy?p=8desh1.htm
Nandan Nilekani acquires stake in Dhanlaxmi Bank
Nandan Nilekani , Infosys' co-founder and chairman of Unique Identification Authority of India (UIADI), has acquired over one per cent in private sector lender Dhanlaxmi Bank.

He took over the reins of UIADI in 2009 and had resigned as the CEO of the country's largest software exporter Infosys in 2007.

According to the information available with Bombay Stock Exchange, Nilekani holds 9,93,827 shares in the bank which translates into 1.17 per cent stake as on March 31, 2011.

Dhanlaxmi Bank is among the banks in the country which does not have any domestic or foreign promoters.

Apart from Nilekani, there are 22 shareholders which hold stakes between 1 and 7 per cent in the Kerala-based bank.

Nilekani and his family, which currently holds 3.44 per cent stake in Infosys, is the second largest promoter in the software firm after the company's mentor N R Narayana Murthy and his family.

Nilekani served as the CEO of the company from 2002 to 2007, when he relinquished his position to his colleague Kris Gopalakrishnan, becoming Co-Chairman. He left Infosys in 2009 to serve as the chairperson of the UIADI, in the rank of a cabinet minister under invitation from the Prime Minister Manmohan Singh.
India to have network of strategic roads by 2013
Against the backdrop of Chinese infrastructure build-up along the Sino-Indian border, a senior military official today said India would develop a network of strategic roads in the North-East and Ladakh region by 2013.

"By 2013 we would be able to complete work on bulk of the roads. There can not be a deadline for the last road as there are some very tough nuts to crack and we are trying to find the solution," Border Roads Organization (BRO) Director General Lt Gen S Ravi Shankar told reporters here.

About 63 per cent of work on 27 roads in Arunachal Pradesh and 12 in Ladakh are complete, he said, adding that these are high priority roads closely monitored at the highest levels.

On whether environment clearances were creating obstacles in construction of these roads, Shankar said, "We need to take forest clearance in some areas to widen roads or to construct roads in Gangtok (Sikkim) region. The local government has been helpful in sorting out these problems."

He said the BRO has been undergoing a restructuring process since 2007 and has purchased equipment worth Rs 200 crore. Orders for equipment worth another Rs 166 crore will materialize in the next two to three years, he added.

With the help of improved equipment, BRO is now able to construct five kilometers of roads and nine metres of bridges every day.

"We are responsible for maintenance of 15,000 kilometers of roads in border areas. We have also built 19 airfields and 36 kilometers of bridges on these important roads," he said.

BRO has also constructed roads in Bhutan, Mayanmar, Afghanistan and recently built a runway in Tajikistan.

This year the organization received a budget of Rs 5000 crore which it would be using to purchase state-of-the-art machines to negotiate roads in mountains and rugged hilly terrain, he said.

Discussion on alternatives of Endosulfan on: ICAR
SHILLONG: Indian Council of Agricultural Research director general S Ayyappan today said the controversial Endosulfan pesticide had no "residual affects".

"From our side it is clear. It is an ideal pesticide. There is no residual affect," Ayyappan said here.

"But there could be different situations in which it is being used or different crops on which it can be used without proper guidance or advisory," he said, adding, 'concerns could be raised then'.

When pointed to the concerns in Kerala, ICAR DG said, "We are discussing and providing technical back-up."

He said everyday new molecules were being developed and old ones phased out.

"People are bringing alternatives everyday. DDT was there yesterday, today it is not. If we get a new alternative, nobody is dogmatic that we want to hold on to the same thing. We are in discussion. New formulations are coming in," he said when asked about the demands to ban the pesticide.

Kerala has been pressing for a nationwide ban on Endosulfan as studies by experts had shown that its use in northern Kasaragod district had caused nearly 500 deaths and chronic health problems to hundreds.

The Supreme Court on May 2 had sought response from the Centre on a petition seeking ban on Endosulfan across the country.

Rejecting suggestions that Government was against a ban on Endosulfan, Environment Minister Jairam Ramesh had said recently that the country could phase out the pesticide before the 11-year time-frame agreed at Stockholm Convention if a cost-effective alternative is found.
5 MAY, 2011, 12.58AM IST, DEVIKA BANERJI & VIRAJ DESAI,ET BUREAU

Road contractors to follow BOT model; bigger developers to benefit

NEW DELHI: Concerned over the high cost and quality, the government has decided highways should be built only through arrangements that create long-term stake for builders.

An empowered group of ministers on infrastructure has decided that 95% of road projects awarded in the current year should be through build -operate- transfer (BOT) model to ensure the builder is engaged with the projects for many years.

EPC (engineering, procurement and contract) deals, where developers build roads for the government for a payment after which their engagement ends, will be limited to 5% of the projects.

"The EGoM has decided the financing plan for this year's road projects and it seems to be in the right direction," planning commission member BK Chaturvedi told ET. The policy shift will benefit the bigger developers because the smaller ones will lack the financial muscle to take on BOT and annuity projects.

The returns for the BOT projects could come through tolling of roads or annuity payments from the government, but the government is keener on the self-funding toll model.

The government is worried about annuity payments becoming a big drag on the budget in the recent years and is even considering a cap on such payments.

Within the BOT projects proposed to be executed in partnership with the private sector, 60% will be toll-based while 35% will compensate the developer through annuity payments by the government.

The project break last year was 15% for EPC and 85% for BOT - 65% toll and 20% annuity.

"Currently, there are many problems in the EPC model and the cost escalations are too huge and are not acceptable. We need to work on the EPC policy," Chaturvedi added.

In the current EPC model, a contractor builds the road and if the cost estimates and design of the project changes midway, the government covers the costs. The current model also does not mandate the contractor to maintain the road.

Independent experts have also endorsed the idea, but feel in certain cases such as naxal-affected areas EPC model will make more sense because of security reasons and inability to toll roads.

"From a national point of view, toll and annuity should be given more focus," said Vinayak Chatterjee, chairman, Feedback Ventures.

Fiscal constraint may end up increasing the share of toll based rates even further. Last year, the finance ministry had capped annuity payments of the National Highways Authorities of India at Rs 8,500 crore from Rs 18,000 crore earlier.

"Our major thrust is on BOT toll projects," said an official in the NHAI.

"Last year, there were hardly any EPC projects and only a few projects that were terminated earlier had to be done through this model," he said.

Another official added that despite the financing break up suggesting 15% of EPC projects in 2010-11, around 80% of the projects awarded were on BOT toll model in 2010-11 and rest on annuity. NHAI hopes to do an equivalent or more toll-based BOT projects in the current year.

"The idea behind the financial plan is that all our money does not get locked up in annuities and that we have balance among the various modes of awarding contracts," Chaturvedi said.

8 MAY, 2011, 04.48PM IST,REUTERS

India tops sales focus for global companies: Study

LONDON: India tops the sales focus for major global corporations, followed closely by China, and a third of companies also see these two countries as the top markets for production, according to a study.

A survey by accountants Ernst & Young, released on Friday, found that 47 percent of high-performing global firms saw India as the most important market for sales while 44 percent named China. The importance of India and China remained the same regardless of where the firms were headquartered, the study found.

On a broader level, which included top-performing as well as less successful companies, India was seen as the top focus of 34 percent of firms and China was only just behind with 33 percent.

The other members of the BRIC group of the world's biggest emerging economies were some way down, with Brazil the main focus for 19 percent of companies and Russia for 14 percent,

"It appears that the combination of high volume and rapid growth in the India and China markets lifts them outside the normal more regional focus," Ernst & Young said.

"Brazil can be seen to continue to emerge, while Russia's relative importance has declined," said the study, noting Russia had fallen out of the top 10 for North American firms though it is in fifth place for Western European firms.

The study, conducted for Ernst & Young by the Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU), interviewed 400 top-level executives at leading international corporations in January and February 2011. It distinguished between top-performing and less successful companies on the basis of revenue and EBITDA growth.

Almost half the high-performance companies named economic growth forecasts as the main factor for sales and investment strategies while 40 percent identified demographic profiles.

India and China are the world's fastest growing big economies and have over a billion people each.

The study found that the top markets for production for all respondents were China (30 percent) and India (28 percent), followed by Brazil and Mexico with 12 percent each. But among high performers, 43 percent preferred India followed by China which was favoured by 41 percent.

While 40 percent of best-performing European firms and two-thirds of Asian companies named India as their top investment destination, China topped the list in North America, picked by 41 percent of leading businesses.

India was named as the favoured production focus by far fewer of the less successful businesses across the continents.

"This suggests that a focus on India in certain markets contributes to growth," the study added.

Russia got 13 percent of the votes of high-performing firms in Western Europe and 13 percent in North America. Brazil got 16 percent and 9 percent respectively.

7 MAY, 2011, 07.30AM IST,ET BUREAU

Sebi chairman UK Sinha rules out reversing predecessor's policy on mutual funds, IPO pricing under Sebi scanner

MUMBAI: New Sebi chief UK Sinha on Friday said he does not intend to reverse rules put in place by his predecessor that restricted the ability of mutual funds to pay commissions to distributors. Indian fund houses, which manage equity and debt schemes with a corpus of over Rs 7,000,00 crore, were pinning hopes on a change in policies introduced by CB Bhave, whose three-year tenure ended in February this year.

But in his first interview after taking over as chairman of India's stock market regulator, the former CEO of UTI Asset Management Company-the fourth-largest fund house-said a U-turn was not on the cards.

"I don't think you can expect a policy reversal. But what we will do is to facilitate the widening of the geographical spread of the mutual fund industry, improve disclosures and focus on making mutual funds more investor-friendly," he told ET on Friday.

In August 2009, Bhave had banned entry loads, or the commission paid to distributors, a move that has benefited investors but continues to draw howls of protest from the mutual fund industry.

The so-called entry load refers to the industry practice of passing on 2.25% of the money paid by investors to buy units of mutual funds as commission to distributors. Asset management companies, which run mutual funds, have incessantly complained that distributors are no longer keen to sell mutual funds to investors.

Sinha said he was mindful of the fact that there had been a net outflow in fiscal 2010-11 and a decline in the number of accounts of mutual fund investors, but investors have gained as all their money was being deployed in the market. Sebi had quantified such gains at over Rs 1,300 crore.

The Sebi chief, who worked in the Indian Administrative Service for over three decades marked by stints in the banking division of the finance ministry, said a final call on two key policy initiatives-new rules governing takeovers and norms for ownership of stock exchanges based on the Bimal Jalan committee report- will be taken after the views of the government are taken into consideration.

Sinha was in the finance ministry at a time the old financial institution ICICI was being converted into a bank, and later had a stint in the capital markets division of the ministry after which he quit the government half-way into the UTI job.

There has been resistance from industry to some of the recommendations on takeover rules made by a committee headed by former head of the Securities Appellate Tribunal C Achuthan , notably the one advocating a ban on non-compete fee and the other mandating a public offer to buy out 100% of a company.

"I have some idea of the thinking of the committees and there are strong views for and against. The general view of the Sebi board has been that we should encourage competition and our attempt is to take a decision at the earliest, " he said.

Sinha also said a group has been formed to ensure that information provided to investors in the prospectus of initial public offerings helps them in taking the right decision. "Our understanding is that Sebi is asking for too much information in an unstructured manner which is again an area for improvement."

sell Air India?

With accumulated losses amounting to nearly $3 billion, the 10-day crippling strike of Air India pilots may have come at the worst possible time for the flag carrier, but it has also raised the pitch for privatisation like never before.

With Maharaja a pauper, is it time to sell Air India?

"The Maharaja had become a pauper a long time ago," said Capt Gustav Baldauf, who was brought specifically in to oversee the merger of Indian Airlines with Air India and take the carrier back to its days of glory but quit a few months ago as its chief operating officer.

"This mess is thanks to the management and constant interference by the government," Baldauf, who has served carriers such as Austrian Airlines and Jet Airways in various capacities, told IANS.

Experts said losses are not the carrier's only problems: There is a problem with integration, human resource issues that have now been compounded because of the merger, charges of irrational route planning, and general mismanagement.

"Who will repay the bank loans worth $10 billion or the dues to oil companies for fuel, or for that matter for leased aircraft and the new ones that have been ordered," asked Amber Dubey, director for areospace and defence, with global consultancy KPMG.

"On the other hand, Air India is also sitting on billions of dollars worth of assets and property. What will happen to it? How much of it will be on the block and who will have the muscle to buy it?" Dubey queried again.

With Maharaja a pauper, is it time to sell Air India?

Some experts feel the role that had been envisaged for Air India -- when it had to serve non-profitable routes for social reasons, evacuate Indians in distress from both within and outside the country -- is no longer required.

From being the dominant player in Indian skies about a decade back, Air India's market share fell to 16 percent which was one of the reasons why the government was reluctant to invoke the provisions of the Essential Services Maintenance Act to tackle the pilots' strike.

This despite the fact that the carrier has a fleet of 135 aircraft, of which 108 are its own, most of them new and acquired in recent years from the Boeing Company and Airbus Industrie. The carrier runs 460 daily domestic and overseas flights.

"The only way to salvage the carrier is to either bring in the private sector or include a new stakeholder in the airline in some form or the other," said Baldauf, under whose tenure the mandate was given to Deloitte to come out with a turn-around plan.

With Maharaja a pauper, is it time to sell Air India?

Civil Aviation Minister Vayalar Ravi, who took charge of the portfolio just in January, said the revival of the flag carrier was his top priority and that every effort will be made to set the house in order.

"We had already invested Rs.2,000 crore (around $450 million) into the carrier last year and it will receive another Rs.1,200 crore ($250 million) this year. So investment will come and the turn-around plan will be implemented successfully," Ravi told IANS.

Air India chairman and managing director Arvind Jadhav said the revival plan will focus on equity infusion, shift to long-term loans, interest cut, making repair and ground-handling operations into separate entities, and resolving integration issues.

But Air Marshal (retired) Denzil Keelor, the hero of the India-Pakistan war in 1965 and an arbitrator between the flag carrier and the unions in the late 1990s, feels it was time the government sold Air India.

With Maharaja a pauper, is it time to sell Air India?

"It's our money. The tax payers' money. It can be used in so many different ways. Let us build schools, roads. We need all the resources to build this country and get people out of poverty. Let us not waste it on Air India," Keelor told IANS.

"Otherwise, no one cares about the national carrier -- not the politicians, not the management, and not even the unions. They are all just there to use it for their own interests and nothing more," Keelor added.

Yet some feel, even though the recent pilots' strike of 10 days dented the carrier's image a lot, there was still scope to nurse Air India back to financial and operational health.

"They can certainly do it. Don't forget it was the number one carrier a few years ago. There is no reason why it cannot be done. This is also a service industry. If the human resource issues are settled, the rest will follow," said expert Ankur Bhatia of Bird Group.

Source: IANS

Karnataka - Campaign against the US Water Trade Mission to India

Fact Sheet on Operation Green Hunt

Mumbai - November 3 Protest Against Adarsh & Other Land Scams

IPT on Land Acquisition, Resource Grab, and Operation Green Hunt - Resource documents

Kolkata - CESC contract workers on strike

Kolkata - Lalgarh Convention, October 12

National Action Week - "GODAMO KE TALE KHOLO" : September 22-28

Getting to know the Second Green 'Revolutionary' Ruler-Corporates!

Pamphlet of Matangini Mahila Samiti in protest against the charging of Debalina Chakrabarty with UAPA

Delhi Rally for Justice in Bhopal, 24 Jun

Adivasis, Mining and Monopoly Capital: Issue 18 of Update Booklet

Click here to read Update publication, Issue 18, on Operation Green Hunt [PDF, English, 79 pages] »

Contents

Introduction 1
Adivasis in Central and Eastern India 7
Adivasi People and Forests 11
Mad Rush for Mining and Adivasi People 18
Exploitation: Economic and

Read this article »

Public Meeting - Indian State's War on People and the Assault on Democratic Voices

Organized by Forum Against War on People

3PM-8PM, 24TH APRIL 2010
Gandhi Peace Foundation, Deen Dayal Upadhyay Marg, ITO, DELHI
SPEAKERS
Randhir Singh, Justice Rajender Sachar, PK Vijayan, Madan Kashyap, Sumit Chakravorty, Varavara Rao, Neelabh,
B D Sharma, S A R Geelani, Aparna, Darshanpal,  Arundhati Roy, Ravinder Goel, Karen Gabriel, N Venuh,
Kalpana Mehta, Kabir Suman, G N Saibaba, Mrigank, Ish […]

Read this article »

Krishak Committee pamphlet against Operation Green Hunt

On the eviction of slums in Kolkata: A leaflet

Click here to read leaflet [PDF, Bengali] »

Feb 15 2010. From the Brihottoro Kolkata Khalpar Basti Uchhed Pratirodh Committee(Greater Kolkata Slum Eviction Resistance Committee), an organisation resisting the eviction of slums in Kolkata.

Read this article »

Sanhati Selections 2011

sanhaticover.jpg

Read this article »

South City Projects, Kolkata: A montage of anti-people activities

Click here to read booklet on South City Projects Kolkata Ltd. [PDF, Bengali] »

This booklet, published in Bengali by the Forum Against Anti-People South City Projects, traces the activities of South City Projects, a real estate giant in Kolkata [company logo: Live the way the world does]. This literature is a part of the South City page at Sanhati.

Included is a collage of leaflets and news pieces dating back from 2002 to the present.

Read this article »

Press Statement of the Citizens' Expert Committee on BT Brinjal

West Bengal - More than fifty polluting sponge iron factories

Lokayat group, Pune: Literature and activities

The Lokayat group is an activist forum based in Pune, India. As part of an effort to collect activist literature and feature various local efforts from all over the country, we are bringing our readers some material from the group, as well as an account of their recent activity. -Ed.

Read this article »

Update newsletter: Aspects of Indian agriculture, land reforms, and imperialism

Published in June 2006, this issue of Update studies extensively studies aspects of Indian agriculture and the Land Reform Programmes of the State.

ContentsChapter 1: (a) Landholding patterns among rural households (b) Landholding patterns among SC, ST, and other social groups (c) Irrigation pattern by operational holdings and area operated (d) Irrigation pattern by social groups (e) Landless agricultural labour households (f) Unemployment and underemployment in agricultural labour households (g) Earnings and wages of agricultural labour households (h) Expenses and consumption Chapter 2:
Land reforms and imperialism

Click here to read Update Newsletter [PDF, English] »

ShramikShakti Newsletter: June-July 2009

Editorial - Now is the time to start working for a true alternative
(i) For changing policies, and not only change government - Form Coalitions, Prepare (ii) How can Sunderbans be saved ? (iii) Lalgarh - Terror of Joint Forces

(iv) The gift of Congress after winning elections - (a) giving sanction to 9 SEZ-s (b) indication to dismantle public distribution system (c) disinvestment of public sector

(v) Are people's representatives really representing the people ? (vi) Issue : Self-analysis of CPI(M) after elections (vii) Struggle in Peru for water-land-forests (viii) Bhandarkhali - Story of stopping Aila (ix) Big capital in retail : the Metro model (x) Turbulent May in the western world (xi) Lok Sabha 2009 elections - manifesto of Trinamul Congress (xii) Hindmotor - Real estate development on factory-land (xiii) Titagarh Lumtex - Victory of the struggling workers (xiv) Tea Gardens - 10 lakh workers have lost work

Click here to read ShramikShakti, June-July 2009 [PDF, Bengali] »

Crossed and Crucified: Parivar's war against minorities - A PUCL and Kashipur Solidarity Group report

After the killing of Laxmanananda Saraswati on 23 August 2008, a Hindutva-led pogrom against Dalit Christians started in the Kandhamal district of Orissa. Till now, according to official reports, 39 people have been killed. Nearly, 50,000 people have been hounded out of their villages, their houses have been gutted and their belongings have been looted.

This report, prepared by PUCL-Bhubaneshwar and Kashipur Solidarity Group, has tried to document the systematic targeting and hounding of the Adivasi and Dalit Christians in the Kandmahal region. In the process, the report also provides a glimpse of a long running conflict in that area, which has been used by the dominant forces such as the state, its policies and institutions, institutionalized religion and the Oriyas (who are the caste Oriyas), along with other players.

Click here to read Crossed and Crucified [PDF, English] »

Policies on industrial land and the burgeoning real estate scam: A Nagarik Mancha study

This document by Nagarik Mancha discusses the policies of West Bengal government regarding land belonging to industries and the conditions of workers in West Bengal. The first part talks about the infamous 14Z amendment to the West Bengal land reforms act which has allowed the West Bengal government to sell back "leasehold" land to the owners of industries as "freehold" land such that the land can be used for the rejuvenation of the industry. What has actually happened is that the land has been sold off for real estate development and the industry has been closed down. The case at Hind Motors is an example (the earlier case of Usha and South City was the prototype of this process). Biggest land scam in the history of West Bengal going on.

The second part takes a close look at the issues pertaining to workers that have been included in the CPI(M) election manifesto (a total of 30 lines in the 32 page manifesto of a "communist" party!) and the reality of the condition of workers in West Bengal.

Click here to read this article by Nagarik Mancha [PDF, Bengali] »

ShramikShakti Newsletter: January 2009

(i) After the Mumbai attacks - again the war mongering
(ii) Israel attack on Gaza - condemnation across the world
(iii) Lalgarh : New Phase of Struggle
(iv) Results from the 18 day strike in jute mills
(v) Attack on worker by South City Mall owners - the fight for dignity of Shambhu Singh
(vi) Editorial on anti-terrorism bill
(vii) Lalgarh : attempt to entrap struggle by bureaucratic manouvers
(viii) Obama's victory is US presidential elections
(ix) Corporate scam - Satyam exposed
(x) Land acquisition for airport at Andal
(xi) The struggle of workers of Lumtex Jute Mill
(xii) The crisis in world capitalism
(xiii) Greece erupts in struggles
(xiv) Workers occupy factories at Chicago

Click here to read ShramikShakti, January 2009 [PDF, Bengali] »

Sponge Iron Industries in Bengal and Community Devastation - A Nagarik Mancha Study

This report from Nagarik Mancha studies sponge iron industries in regions like Purulia, Bankura, Birbhum, and West Midnapur in Bengal - the areas traditionally regarded as "less fertile". Cutting across districts, it finds liquid waste, uncontrolled effluents, and groundwater depletion wreaking havoc on the lives of local communities, with WBPCB merely a silent spectator. Amongst many examples are the Lodha Sabars displaced in Gajashimul, Jhargram, after promises of jobs have gone unkept; and migrant workers in cement factories and sponge iron units across the state working in hazardous conditions. Most importantly, the study discerns an emerging contour of local resistance.

Click here to read Nagarik Mancha report on Sponge Iron industries [PDF, English] »

ShramikShakti Newsletter: May 2009

(i) No UPA, NDA, Third Front - Need for a principled political alliance
(ii) Our country : unemployment, agrarian distress, wage decline
(iii) Building industries in closed factories : CPI(M)'s false propaganda
(iv) Struggles continue : Lalgarh, Pashupathy Factory, Lumtex Jute Mill, Infogen, Kalyani Paper Mill.
(v) Regional parties' greed for power
(vi) Jobs at the chemical hub ?
(vii) Collage of posters

Click here to read ShramikShakti, May 2009 [PDF, Bengali] »

ShramikShakti Newsletter: March 2009

(i) Infogen - Owner flees with salaries pending
(ii) MKP organises rally against imperialist globalisation
(iii) Truth about Satyam
(iv) Gorkhaland movement - recent developments
(v) Editorial - Lok Sabha Elections
(vi) Hooch tragedy - who is the real culprit ?
(vii) Road blockade by workers of National Jute Mill
(viii) Public meeting at Lalgarh - People's Committee proposes agenda for development
(ix) Buying rice at fair price
(x) Analysis of interim budget
(xi) What do the tax collectors eat ?
(xii) Struggle in Nepal reaches crossroads

Click here to read ShramikShakti March 2009 [PDF, Bengali] »

Chinton - A magazine of Marxian enquiry

The April 2009 issue of Chinton contains two political commentaries and analysis of Nepal (by Prashanta Ray and Biswajit Hazra) and a theoretical piece on Marxian thought (by Deepak Bakshi).

Click here to read Chinton [PDF, Bengali] »

Report on India's first airport city (Andal Airetropolis) from Adhikar

This study on the Airetropolis project in Burdawn district, Durgapur sub-division of West Bengal has been published by a local group called Adhikar, based in Asansol.

Andal, in West Bengal, is going to be the site of India's first Airetropolis - a private airport city at a cost of 5 billion dollars and based on 3500 acres of land. The city will be owned by the Singapore's Changi International Airport, and constructed by Bengal Airetropolis Project Limited. Notice for the project was served according to Section 4(1) from the Burdwan Collector's Office. Various newspapers printed the notice between December 11-21, 2008.

In the first phase, initiative was taken for the acquisition of 2362.84 acres of land, and the notice called on any person associated with the land to come forward and raise objections. But the notice wasn't circulated or publicised through the Panchayats in the villages. As a result, many people do not know about the notice. Even as authorities from Singapore claim that they have spoken to the land owners multiple times.

Land to be acquired in the first phase includes the following villages under (1) Andal Block: Andal, Tamla, DakshinKhanda, Ukhra, Khandra, Moyra, Bhadur, Dhupchuriya and (2) Faridpur Block: Amloka, Bhangori, Arati, Patshaora. These belong to Burdawn district, Durgapur sub-division.

Click here to read booklet on Andal Airetropolis from Adhikar [PDF, Bengali] »

Tribal Peoples Committee of Purulia district hold meeting for basic rights in solidarity with Lalgarh

On 22nd February, 2009, the Adivasi Moolbasi Janashadharan Committee (Tribal Peoples Committee) of Purulia district in West Bengal held a meeting for basic rights and in solidarity with the movement in Lalgarh. Pictures and a charter of demands are given.

Read this article »

Comprehensive documentary from Canvas on monopolistic aggression in retail, Bengal

Canvas Documentary on Big capital monopoly in retail, Bengal [Google Video, 47 mins, Bengali]

This documentary covers the continuous conversion of industrial land into real estate, and the monopolistic assault on retail in Bengal that threatens to render countless workers jobless. Contents: (1) Interviews with small traders, analysts, and activists (2) South City Mall (3) Barrackpore Nonachandanpukur Bazaar (4) Save Park Circus Market Committee (5) Panihati retailers (6) Gariahat hawkers (7) Bolpur retailers samiti (8) Voices against Metro Cash and Carry

Booklet on the Bengal and Indian government's new agricultural policies

February 6, 2009

This booklet on the government's new agricultural policies has been written by Subhendu Dasgupta and published by Nagarik Mancha.

Farmers do not want to remain farmers, they want to leave agriculture and become workers. Agriculture is a "backward" issue, industry is the vehicle to the future; emphasis has to be reduced from agriculture and placed on industry. In West Bengal, we do not need to worry about food and crops. In these currents of thought within the government of West Bengal, we find the broader policies of the central government - the national agricultural policies. There is great parity of thought on agriculture, between economic powers within and without; between political powers at the center and in the state. We will start with the central government's agricultural policies, and end with the Bengal government - in the middle we will explore the ideas pushed by multinational consultancy groups.

Click here to read Sarkarer Notun Krisi Niti [PDF, Bengali] »

Naihati industrial region, Bengal - closed factories, vulnerable workers, affected society

From Save Naihati Industrial Region Manch (Naihati Shilpanchal Bachao Manch), Nov 2008

Click here to read report [PDF, Bengali, 7MB] »

Fact-finding report on Jindal SEZ in Salboni, West Bengal

From SEZ-Birodhi Prachar Manch. Dec, 2008

Click here to view video [Bengali, Google Video]

In Salboni, West Midnapur district of Bengal, the Jindal Group is building a SEZ on 4877.44 acres of land. According to the State Government and JSW Bengal Steel Limited, the SEZ is being built on totally arid land. And that the land has been given joyfully, spontaneously, in return for which the Jindal Group has provided adequate compensation and promises. The job of this team was to probe the veracity of these claims, the socio-economic effect of the purported SEZ on the local population, and its environmental implications.

Click here to read fact-finding report on Salboni SEZ of Jindal [PDF, Bengali, 7MB] »

ShramikShakti November 2008

Contents: (1) Court declares CPIM members as Tapasi Malik's murderers (2) Kanoria Jute Mill workers on the path of struggle after a long time (3) Rice Mill workers getting organized in Bolpur (4) Agricultural workers in Bengal - an exploited class (5) Government TB hospital sold for Re. 1 (6) Kandhamal, Orissa - the Sangh Parivar stokes communal flames (7) Salboni - the Jindals convert plant to SEZ, adivasis protest (8) The Tata-Singur deal (9) Poultry farmers in Arambag in the face of monopolistic capital (10)

Click here to read ShramikShakti, November 2008 [PDF, Bengali] »

SEZ News magazine

Contents: (1) A brief report from Himachal Pradesh (2) POSCO in Orissa: an economic scam brewing? (3) Letter from KSEZ occupied area (4) Goa: how the battle was won (5) Aqaba, Jordan: Special place or Special Zone?

Click here to read SEZ News magazine, April 2008 [PDF, English, 0.6 MB] »

Matongini Mohila Samiti: Newsletter, September 2008

Matangini Mahila Samiti is a group of female students of Jadavpur University, formed in the wake of the Nandigram massacre. Its members were harassed in June 2008 on charges of having Maoist links.

Contents: (1) The nuclear deal: America, India, the CPIM, and where we stand (2) Three daughters of Nandigram (3) CMZ: the destruction of coastal livelihood and environment (4) The Gorkhaland Movement (5) Mahamaya Jagchhe: a mother looks back at the June arrest of Matongini members on Maoist charges

Click here to read Matangini Newsletter, September 2008 [PDF, Bengali, 2.9MB] »

Booklet on anti-people history of Tatas: SEZ-birodhi Prachar Manch

The SEZ-birodhi Prachar Manch is an anti-SEZ watchdog in Bengal. This booklet in Bengali, produced in 2008, dispels certain myths about the Tata corporation.

Contents: (1) Tata's role in Indian economic and foreign policies (2) Aiding killer Union Carbide in Bhopal (3) Tribal land grab and oppression (4) Environmental pollution (5) Tata's old history: (a) supporting British imperialism (b) export of opium to China - the origin of Jamshedji's wealth (6) Exploitation of workers at TISCO (7) Peoples movements against the Tatas

Booklet on the anti-people history of the Tatas [Bengali, PDF, 1.7 MB] »

Leaflets from FAMA on Nov 10 rally, Metro Cash and Carry, and a letter to Mr. Gandhi

A leaflet on Metro Cash and Carry: the license to operate in Bengal - its provisions and consequences »

Rally against monopolistic capital on Nov 10, 2008 - a leaflet »

A letter to Gopal Krishna Gandhi on the effects of big capital in retail »

FAMA or the Forum Against Monopolistic Aggression is fighting against the entry of big capital in retail in Bengal and India, and the consequent dispossession of millions of small traders, their employees, people employed in transportation, storage, etc.

Booklet from FAMA on entry of big capital in retail in Bengal and India

FAMA or the Forum Against Monopolistic Aggression is fighting against the entry of big capital in retail in Bengal and India, and the consequent dispossession of millions of small traders, their employees, people employed in transportation, storage, etc. This booklet, produced in 2008, provides a comprehensive introduction to the subject.

Contents: (1) Introduction: Entry of monopolistic capital in unorganised retail in Bengal and India (2) Why unorganised retail is a profitable vista for big business (3) The international experience (4) A summary of the present situation of unorganised retail in India (5) How the present situation is changing with the entry of big capital (6) The myth of job creation and the contraction of employment (7) Predatory pricing: customers take a hit (8) How agriculture will be affected: an increase in farmer suicide? (9) The new culture of consumption (10) Adverse effects on the environment (11) The hypocrisy of Parliamentary parties (12) Conclusion: comments on the struggle ahead

Click here to read booklet on monopolistic aggression of big capital in retail [PDF, Bengali, 3MB] »

Niyamgiri, Orissa: Mass Convention Against Supreme Court Verdict allowing Vedanta mining

On August 11 2008, India's Supreme Court gave the go-ahead for two huge and controversial mining projects (companies: Vedanta and POSCO) in the eastern state of Orissa. Dongria Kondh tribespeople say their livelihood will be destroyed. The on going peaceful and democratic peoples' movements in the state have been shocked by the fact that one of the main pillars of our democracy, the judiciary has joined the sides of the corporations who are desperate to grab the resources that has been sustaining the life of millions of peasants, tribals, fishermen and forest dwellers only to maximize their own profit.

Read this article »

ShramikShakti Newsletter: September 2008

Contents: (1) 22 workers laid off in Hindmotors as the management strike back (2) Walmart and retail in Bengal (3) Small shopowners protest in Bolpur (4) The historic food movement: 1959 and 1966 (5) The story of the Tatas (6) Workers spend 77 days in jail in a Left-governed state: a personal account (7) Resistance against Dow Chemicals advances in Mumbai (8) The Indo-US Nuclear deal - by Samik Chakraborty (9) A look at Nepal's political trajectory

Click here to read ShramikShakti September 2008 [PDF, Bengali, 1.6 MB]

ShramikShakti Newsletter: August 2008

Contents: (1) Loomtex mill in Titagarh: imprisoned workers released after sustained resistance (2) Agricultural labourers win struggle for wage raise in Dignagar, Burdwan district (3) Hindmotors: the conversion of factory land for real estate (4) The government's policies are responsible for price-rise (5) 1945 document of undivided CPI: a demand for independent Gorkhaland (6) Gorkhaland movement and national self-determination - by Samik Chakraborty (7) Flooding in lower Damodar Valley - who is responsible? - part 2 (8) Resistance in Barackpore Nonachandanpukur Bazaar against eviction (9) Floods in Potashpur (10) Solidarity gathering in Kolkata for Nepal's revolutionary struggle (11) Mineline Engineering in Behala: casual workers fight against illegal activities of owner (12) Egypt in the grip of workers protests (13) International politics on the Tiber issue

Click here to read ShramikShakti [PDF, Bengali, 1.6 MB] »

ShramikShakti Newsletter: June 2008

Contents: (1) Loomtex Engineering Jute Mill in Titagarh: workers imprisoned on false charges (2) My experience of the Nepal Elections - by Kushal Debnath (3) Searching for the reasons behind price-hike (4) National Jute Mill Extra Casual Workers Forum calls convention in Sakrail (5) Economic progress and job creation - a discussion, Part 4 - by Chandan Debnath (6) Lower Damodar Valley flooding - who is responsible? (7) The Panchayat system caught in the tightening noose of capital - an analysis by Shankar Das (8) "Mexico's other border: illegal migrants to U.M by Cynthia Gorney (9) Baburam Dewan - a fading story (10) The people of Tibet resist China

Click here to read ShramikShakti, June 2008 [Bengali, PDF, 1.6 MB] »

Anthropology of a Genocide - Vedanta and tribal movements in Central India

A study by Felix Padel and Samarendra Das, 2006

Contents: (1) Introduction (2) Vedanta Resources and the fight for Orissa's Bauxite Malis (3) Social structure of a company - DFID, DTI, VAL, Vedanta Resurces (4) The question of development - social structure of a tribal community (5) Commemorating Kalinga through Steel (6) The civil war in Bastar

Click here to read Anthropology of a Genocide - Tribal Movements in Central India [PDF, English] »

Coastal Zone Regulation to Coastal Zone Management: A Booklet

Click here to read booklet on Costal Zone Regulation and Coastal Zone Management [PDF, Bengali, 8MB] »

Rajarhat township - cries of despair behind a facade of development

This booklet details land acquisition in Rajarhat, West Bengal - a place which faced the onslaught of development much before Singur and Nandigram moved such debates into wider circles. As a place which has witnessed the terror of development, Rajarhat township is perhaps unique.

Click here to read booklet on Rajarhat land acquisition [PDF, Bengali] »

Shramik Istahar: April-May, 2008 issue

Contents: 1. The murder of worker leader Ram Parvesh Singh at CESC and the state of the unions 2. False police cases, political arrests, and the bail of Mithu Ghosh 3. Nandigram: Police - CPIM nexus cannot be the last word 4. Food price increase - a summary and future directions 5. Chidambaram;s farmer debt-waiver: implications 6. Aspects of global warming 7. Condition of workers in SIPCOT, Gummidipoondi

Click here to read Shramik Istahar April-May 2008 [Bengali, PDF, 250 KB] »

Tumi Maharaj Sadhu hole Aaj! - Real estate land-acquisition in HindMotors

Leaflet from Gana Udyog

B.L.R.O. Srirampore: I won't commit this to paper. However, there is one set of rules for common people, another for the Birlas. I can't do much from my chair. We are servants who obey government directives. Decisions come from much higher up.

(1) Land-acquisition in HindMotors for real-estate: A Timeline
(2) Background

Read this article »

Nandigram during the Panchayat Elections 2008: an SSC leaflet

Click here to read leaflet [Bengali, PDF] »

Click here to read English version of leaflet »

Bondimukti Committee members arrested for protesting political arrests

Bondimukti Committee members protesting against political arrests were attacked by police and have been fasting at College Square, Kolkata, from May 6 2008 in protest.

Read this article »

Panchayat Poll '08: A Preliminary Discussion on Strategies

Nothing can remain the same all through. The masses of rural toilers were summing-up the past experiences on their own and has been feeling betrayed by the party that once the masses themselves enthroned. The feeling of despair was giving rise to wrath. The first sparks of rural spontaneous outbursts were seen in only four or five villages in 2004, and in 2007 it surfaced again more widely in various districts of West Bengal apparently against the corruption of party–govt (including panchayat)–rural bigwigs. Also we saw the Singur-Bhangar-Haripur-Nandigram during 2006 and 2007, where the villagers united to fight govt-party-police-admin nexus attempted to grab land for foreign and native capitalists. In many of these struggles we saw the almost same trend (albeit weakly) that is being witnessed among the workers, i.e., unity of the rural masses irrespective of or cutting across their former party affiliation or adherence, their dissociation from old established parties spontaneously unsettling the power equation of the villages, doing things and achieving feats which they themselves would have thought to be 'impossible' few days before, taking the rein of their own fight and organisation themselves, rebelling against the agonising life, etc. This is an important phenomenon that must be kept in mind before thinking of the tasks ahead of the rural toiling masses in the ensuing panchayat polls.

Click here to read Krishak Committee leaflet [PDF, English, 10 KB] »

Leaflet from Shramik Sangram Committee: The right to struggle and organise is under attack

May 3, 2008 rally

This leaflet from the Shramik Sangram Committee and the Krishak Committee is an appeal to protest, on May 3, 2008, against the attack on the right to struggle and organise in West Bengal. This comes at a time of concerted attacks on civil liberties and cultural activities. In particular, it speaks of the arrest of Mithu Ghosh on the pretext of Maoist connections.

Click here to read leaflet from SSC and KC for May 3 2008 rally [PDF, Bengali] »

The Panchayat elections and self-empowerment of the rural poor

This is a translated version of a leaflet from the Krishak Committee (KC), written and distributed at the advent of Panchayat elections in West Bengal. The Sharamik Sangram Committee (SSC), a small fraternal organisation of the Krishak Commitee, leads the union at Hindustan Lever.

Read this article »

POSCO booklet, leaflet, map from Kolkata rally - February 2008

An analytical booklet on POSCO [PDF, Bengali, 262 KB]

Leaflet of anti-POSCO rally in Kolkata, February 2008

Map of POSCO

Anti-POSCO rally and program in Kolkata

February 13, 2008. Kolkata: A rally from College Square to Utkal Bhavan (an office of the Orissa govornment) took place and was followed by a mass-deputation in Utkal Bhavan against the proposed POSCO project in Jagatsingpur district, Orissa. The program was organised by 18 organizations. After a demonstration in front of Utkal Bhavan the protesters conveyed their solidarity to the POSCO movement in the form of a memorandum to the government of Orissa. The authorities at Utkal Bhavan received the memorandum on behalf of the government of Orissa. Afterwards, anti-POSCO activists including Biswajit Roy shared their experiences with political organisations and human rights activists at the Indian Radical Humanist Associations Hall in a discussion called Posco Ebong Tar Protirodh. Activists involved in the protest movement against illegal and extensive stone quarrying in Asansol and Birbhum were also present to express their solidarity to the people of Orissa and speak about the conditions in the regions where they work.

The 18 organisations which organised the program were: APDR, Chhatra-Chhatri Sanhati Mancha, Little Magazine Samannay Mancha, Lok Seba Sangh, Nandigram Ganahatya Birodhi Prochar Udyog, Sahanagarikder Jukta Mancha, Hawker Sangram Committee, TASAM, USDF, NAPM, Sanhati Udyog, PaschimBanga Khetmazoor Samiti, Ganamukti Parishad, Janasangharsha Samiti, West Bengal Gandhi Peace Foundation, Bondi Mukti Committee, West Bengal Government Employees Union, and National Fishworkers Federation.

Read this article »

Study on Closed and Re-opened Tea Gardens in North Bengal

By Anuradha Talwar, Debashish Chakraborty, Sarmishtha Biswas

This study, dated September 2005, was conducted in the wake of the crisis in the tea industry in the Doars between 2002-2004.

Contents: (1) Conditions in re-opened gardens - wages, ration, hours of work, occupational health and safety, drinking water, electricity, housing, transport for school-children, medical facilities, creches, maternity benefits, fringe benefits, latrines and urinals (2) Conditions in closed and abandoned gardens (3) Workers' dues - tabled by tea estates, categorized under provident fund, gratuity, salary, and total dues (4) Opening agreements (5) Likely non-viability of plantations (6) Role of unions - CITU, UTUC, INTUC, WBTGEA (7) Role of government (8) Plantations Labour Act, 1951

Click here to read study on closed and re-opened ta gardens in North Bengal [PDF, English, 400 KB] »

ShramikShakti Newsletter - January-February 2008

Contents: (1) SEZs stopped in Goa (2) CPI(M) exults over the Nano (3) BJP in power in Gujrat and Himachal - effects on state and national politics (4) Dankuni - huge land acquisition plans (5) Civil society, Karl Marx, and the CPI(M) (6) Economic development and employment generation - a debate (part 2) (7) Vote-based front or unity of struggle? (8) Pollution of drinking water - in search of the source (9) Singur and the High Court verdict (10) Ganashakti's hypocrisy (11) GM crops - agricultural science meet in Bolagarh (12) Bolagarh - lessons from the polls (13) Movement in Kandi - protests against corruption in public distribution system and cal for permanent flood resistance measures (14) Benazir's death and contemporary Pakistan (15) HindMotors and the recent elections

Click here to read ShramikShakti January-February 2008 [PDF, Bengali, 612 KB] »

ShramikShakti Newsletter, December 2007

Contents: (1) Brutal assault on Adivasi tea-garden workers in Assam (2) The 29th November attack on Anti-Posco Movement (3) Buddha at it again - says he's wrong (4) An interview with Avash Munshi of SSKU on the upcoming elections at Hindmotors (5) On Taslima Nasreen (6) Economic development and employment generation - a debate (7) Nandigram and the Nuclear Deal - an understanding between Congress and CPI(M) (8) Nandigram's effect clear in Rail Union Elections (9) Cancel SEZ, Posco go back! - ShramikShakti's interview of Abhay Sahu (10) Nandigram will hold its head high - an eye-wtiness report from the relief camps (11) CPI(M) attacks peaceful anti-acquisition rally in Birshibpur (12) Under U.S. supervision - whither Pakistan? (13) France - workers go on unprecedented strikes

Click here to read ShramikShakti, December 2007 [PDF, Bengali, 720 KB] »

Leaflet from Maitree, a women's rights network, on Nandigram

Maitree had taken the responsibility of campaigning for a day, on Friday, 7th December, 2007, at the temporary structure being called Dharna Mancha (in the Metro Channel, Kolkata). The following leaflet was distributed there. Several Maitree members took part in a 24 Hour fast, including Madhuchchanda Karlekar, Anuradha Kapoor, Swapna Banerjee, Saraswatidi, and Saswati Ghosh. There was also a mass collection of signatures condemning the violence, on a canvas. Other programmes of various kinds were also organized. A candlelight vigil was held in the evening. Cultural programmes and speeches were interspersed throughout the day.

Read this article »

ShramikShakti Newsletter - November, 2007

Contents: (1) Nandigram is bloody once again (2) The Supreme Court on land acquisition in Punjab (3) Ration riots in West Bengal (4) Historic rally in Kolkata (5) Food Shortage in India and Genetically Modified Crops (6) Anti-SEZ convention in Kolkata arranged by the MKP - a report (7) Is Sensex growth an indicator of the country's progress? (8) Maoists leave government in Nepal - which way now?

Click here to read ShramikShakti - November, 2007 [PDF, Bengali, 629 KB]»

Paid back in the same coin: A montage of posters of the historic rally on the 14th November

collage.jpg

14th March was the turning point of Nandigram struggle. Remembering that bloody day, a historic rally was organised on 14th November at Kolkata from College Square. No organizational banner was there. The central theme of the rally was "Stretch your hand to the attacked people of Nandigram". Common people registered their hate and anger for the autocratic rulling party of West Bengal. They overflowed the city streets with thousands of militant yet silent protests.

Some Posters:

14th_michhil3.jpg 14th_michhil1.jpg 14th_michhil2.jpg 14th_michhil4.jpg 14th_michhil5.jpg

Pictures of the rally (courtesy: Nagarik Mancha)
nagarik-1.jpg dsc05439.JPG dsc05443.JPG dsc05460.JPG dsc05481.JPG click here for more.

Pictures from those who were a part of history that Kolkata witnessed that day:

Picture courtesy Indranil Ghosh Dastidar:
atgaaadywf5fzs2xr3mob1w-dpmmyxgxefoaf06a98wni6mgawmkqv2qisnfdljbs5lde0rgorhjz8fpsmldx3uxmvgfajtu9va9coiteauq0ju4s_mydeekx8hyyq.jpg atgaaadxtbjc5kggjfmwjye7mresxdogcczqbbqy5ylktnlwzkvhhwy0bzsjofmnw4bjcypsxzgr1szmo3-logre695uajtu9vanbaubepsttb-l-wjd4ezkspkq_g.jpg atgaaadudyhtwae1gr4o4ejcmxu_vrehr90ignz6-vfgnf79×0ux270xgp866bibpizpjzpws87wmuvqoqolkn2b8asaajtu9vcmfdyqfwb8gxysmfnbsx9g3gxnma.jpg atgaaadtdbhkfpm0zjopovvdoio6p86gsjt0y6j5scyqcertfbwwbggqb8ruw-koa9rixbfhtqjj_anzoluineunkdp5ajtu9vaidbzmldlp0_z7wxhyllpufvuulw.jpgatgaaadpgamwi1g9xwujchxkomaxwqzuis7wxo6zl8ghw3tng0yrxktcqc3v77cpbytvpfay63ocqmgftuyefycmyflwajtu9vbzudt6gyyi8ekcxp45fkhbzjzd7a.jpg atgaaacrbb-kyggpf6kqlmybd1nxnz0ygoszx75m5taektsve9bc_bzmpw3tlvguldu7hbf8pxu6vdo3v16aazmvsncwajtu9vbfoamwqtgi4lb3invpbqryr1xtta.jpg atgaaacesp_3utpw3h_xxwk9drrraunqcwkeekglykqklaqi3gjmjurluzoaa3×9swye7cl1dnvxupqmma_ksdyzbfhqajtu9vdhb2yvcsweb8pculgrennf17m8qa.jpg atgaaacdjzzgb6rjenk0fkwgsniwyss949wfg6gxureha180qdk8kr60qsw77wd-snncwdc-bkosqjlfuj486wyetm_9ajtu9vbvytc2nr3-wu5aqzvh8jmaz014pq.jpgatgaaacaibe1w_obmshwd9dfeum2043hdwv7q4o7dz4zekimsku5m1vy0qb_ig3owp3p2q490z2oaeela0gye3soodmdajtu9vc732q_kgrbxf1tdgmao4h3i_5_kg.jpg atgaaac3glkb0orf-nrm7qhlwuh2zyrvlbkykhvfbcctd8iyo__ndbbtmiksjjpf5vlncmb61lomxnorr1a-jjdhxpnnajtu9vdzvbqk_wbheaokj4ghfppawpj2rw.jpg atgaaabmyit-gicmmnk_kjxe314rujd3vf2c0cppbgq87fwmwsca1lrolfy28m0qrms5owfz3pfwn2xrmk5qup7662goajtu9vaddcckdogt-uaknlv7rquvklqg1g.jpg atgaaab74sy06nqdrmdyd7a4gmjepi-rmdiaeootnnaortobrvpmfgiv_rikzc2-jmde8xfnyh50rlg9nlcwnnbjvnnfajtu9vdnbny18ylsflevr_omp7uwugqcpq.jpgatgaaaavcvwird6p1gu9_bdoo3ifiitnd6tetqvkd1dlr8t0rcbtxp8jbfx8i36oucdzc_fkoaetrtxdp_xdmixl-l0pajtu9vckt9-cvcpc576wz-rzc9jkyht_6q.jpg atgaaab_dln_muovgmmia79vandqelxg2tazxvttjpzizgztvjtv5iq1vjcqj97k8×4fv3qqr9zlzidjm94lukcqowp9ajtu9vdrc9aym8aetemgw5sb7_wqmjkagw.jpg atgaaaan0tqau7vet03rc2b8uoymg0vt5iskjhn_prh92dzdcedzygntvdxiiyteyh4yqpwzdqhih6cnhpqcwn0ymdthajtu9vdupcubgsqjizwqvlpf2wjjxkuhua.jpg michhil-7.jpg michhil-9.jpg michhil-8.jpg michhil-11.jpg michhil1.jpg michhil6.jpg michhil4.jpg michhil2.jpg michhil5.jpgmichhil3.jpg michhil-12.jpg atgaaadsx2dwbbwnkfge5c1ck_tqdzgarwdsv_-4ox1f3gnjnsu7svufqzro7xaf561suyjwzhxcmrnybh5ecgqqkne5ajtu9vdid9fzmr_dn8jifwqhktevylclqw.jpg michhil-10.jpg

Picture courtesy Maroona Murmu:
michhil11.jpg michhil21.jpg michhil31.jpg michhil51.jpg michhil41.jpg michhil111.jpg michhil12.jpg michhil8.jpgmichhil9.jpg michhil10.jpg michhil7.jpg michhil61.jpg

Picture courtesy Kunal Chattopadhyay:
ku2.jpg ku3.jpg ku4.jpg ku31.jpg ku12.jpg ku11.jpg ku5.jpg ku13.jpg ku1.jpg ku14.jpg ku21.jpg ku10.jpg

ghare phirechhilo jaaraa - posters on Nandigram

"ghare phera" "hiroshimaa nay, nandigram."

ghare_phera.jpg hiroshimana.jpg

Saviors of the world

Click here to view

MKP Booklet on SEZ - A critical look at the SEZ Act

This booklet from Mazdoor Kranti Parishad covers the following :
(1) How the SEZ Act was created - the international and national backdrop
(2) SEZ Act 2005 - the most important of its 58 sections and SEZ Rule 2006 - the most important of its 77 rules
(3) Critically examining the sections and rules - (i) Section 5 ( examining generation of additional economic activity, promotion of exports of goods and services, promotion of investment from domestic and foreign sources, creation of employment opportunities, development of infrastructure), (ii) Sections 11, 12, 20, 21, 22, 23, 46, 51, 53 - the powers of the Development Comissioner in an SEZ, and colonial parallels (iii) Sections 26, 27, 32, 50 - exemptions, drawbacks, and concessions to developers and entrepreneurs, and what it means for social and rural programs (iv) Rule 11(10) - allotment of SEZ land for non-business purposes - real estate profits and promoters (v) Rule 44 - Contract farming for agricultural SEZs - what it means for the farmer and the seed company
(4) SEZ, and the stance of the BJP, Congress, and CPI(M).
(5) West Bengal SEZ Bill 2003
(6) Alternatives

Click here to read MKP's booklet on SEZ [PDF, Bengali, 290KB] »

Documents from the National Anti-SEZ Convention in Kolkata, Oct 1-2, 2007

These discussion documents were presented from MKP during the national anti-SEZ convention in Kolkata, Oct 1-2, 2007.

Click here to read first document [PDF, Bengali, 66KB] »
Click here to read second document [PDF, Bengali, 75KB] »

Poster - National Anti-SEZ Convention: Oct 1 2007, Mahajati Sadan. Arranged by MKP

mkpconvention.jpg Click here to view poster with program details [JPG, Bengali, 60KB]

ShramikShakti Newsletter - September, 2007 issue

ShramikShakti September 2007 issue covers pieces on : (1) NREGA struggles led by MKP in Aushgram, (2) Beating back Reliance Fresh, (3) the Chemical Hub at Nayachar and the Dow Chemicals nexus, (4) The Kalyani Industrial Area - revisting a disastrous industrial foray, (5) Bauria, Mathkal, Hindwar Industries Workers Movement, (6) The Indo-US Nuclear deal (7) MarichJhapi - the history that cannot be forgotten.

Click here to read ShramikShakti [PDF, Bengali, 2.5 MB] »

Shilpayon - Rupkatha aar Bastob (Industrialisation - Fairytales and Reality)

By Dipanjan Rai Chaudhuri

This extensive analytical booklet covers the following - (1) A study of China and its economic liberalization post 1980, evaluated not by dollars invested but by the detailed statistics of jobs created (2) Popular resistance to growing inequality in China, and its effects (3) Tracing the history of SEZs in West Bengal, and its present state (4) An evaluation of the popular equation big capital investment = job creationin the light of Falta, Haldia Petrochemicals, and other examples (5) A summary of foreign capital in Latin America (6) Exploring job-creating industrialization and "alternatives" (a) The need for small industries (b) Who will take care of heavy industry? (c) The farmer forms the market (d) Not Fascist force, but working with the consent of the people.

Click here to read Shilpayon - Rupkatha aar Bastob [Bengali, PDF, 265 KB] »

Caterpillar and the Mahua Flower: Tremors in India's Mining Fields

As multinational conglomerates walk away from Orissa and Chhattisgarh with state blessings to prospect for resources under the earth, the original custodians of the land, the Adivasis, find that their homes and livelihoods are being bulldozed to make way for industries. While the lavish lifestyles and expensive tastes of mining moguls is chronicled in minute detail, the struggle of the Adivasis seldom gets the attention it deserves. This book endeavors to illumine the dark corners of India's mining corridor.

Contents : (1) Iron in the Soul - Roger Moody (2) "Agya, What do you mean by development?" - Felix Padel and Samarendra Bose (3) No Man's Land - Alok Prakash Putul (4) Road to Perdition - Aman Sethi (5) The Base Alchemist - Roger Moddy (6) How Green was my Mountain - Neeraj Agarwal (7) Under a Black Sky - Ranjan K Panda (8) Forgeries in Steel : We also make Poverty - Ashly Hinmon (9) Never say DAE - Xavier Dias (10) Nero's Children - Amit Raja, translated by Rahul Rajesh (11) Full Monty, Please! - Umesh Nazir, translated by Rahul Rajesh (12) Defying the Juggernaut - Bhigneswar Sahu (13) Fifth Columnists? - Kedar Mishra

Click here to read Caterpillar and the Mahua Flower [PDF, 849 KB] »

Shramikshakti Newsletter - Workers struggle in Sakrail, Gaurishankar Jute, Chadmoni - SEZ in Ranihati

This August, 2007 issue contains (1) an analysis of the Haldia elections (2) the proposed SEZ in Ranihati (3) struggle in National Jute Mill, Sakrail (4) struggle in Gaurishankar Jute Mill (5) Chadmoni Tea Gardens - an update (6) A stocktaking of the Hindmotors movement (7) the CPIM and Bidhan Chandra Ray (8) from Nandigram to Khammam (9) Taposi Malik and the CBI

Click here to read Shramikshakti [Bengali, PDF, 2.8 MB] »

Chronicles of a Struggle - Booklet on Kashipur, Kalinganagar - The tribal struggle for survival

By Achyut and Vidya Das. Courtesy : Agragamee

(1) The Kashipur anti-mining movement (2) Globalization and Genocide (3) Kalinganagar : a first impression report.

"This small booklet is an effort to highlight the courage and endurance of tribal people as they make desperate bids to survive against an inhuman paradigm of "globalisation". We hope that a time wil come, in the near future, when ancient wisdom will once again be valued and we will learn to live together, and not on the destroyed and forgotten histories and identities of our brethren, the tribal people of this country."

Click here to read Chronicles of a Struggle [English, PDF, 1.6 MB] »

Chemical Hub - Ek Nihshobdo Ghatok (A Silent Killer)

From Platform publications, 45 Beniatola Lane, Kolkata 700009

The government of West Bengal has decided to build a chemical hub in the aftermath of Nandigram - the only question right now is where. This article analyses the effects of such a plan. Topics covered include the experience of other countries with chemical industries ( Brazil's Valley of DeathJapan - the Minamata Disease), the bloody histories of chemical corporations such as Dow, and the effect on the environment and public health.

Click here to read article [Bengali, PDF, 23 pages] »

Self Help for Slow Learners : A True Story

Click here to read article »

Leaflet from Bandi Mukti Committee - calling for unconditional release of Binayak Sen, Sumit Sarkar, Amitava Bhattacharya, and other Hindmotors Workers

The government of West Bengal is, of course, no exception. From 2000, several thousand people have been arrested on political grounds - among them are Sushil Ray, Patit Paban Haldar, Probodh Purokayastha, Tom Adhikary, Milton Barman, Harsha Bardhan Das, Bansi Badan Barman, and others. In North Bengal, numerous Kamtapuri and Great Cooch Bihar activists have been jailed on false charges. 29 members of SUCI and 11 people charged with Maoist connections are currently serving life in prison. Recently, the State arrested a number of activists associated with the Hindmotors movement. Swooping down late at night, the police arrested SSKU leaders Amitava Bhattacharya, Subhendu Biswas, and six others as they continued their hunger-strike. Sumit Sarkar was arrested simply for participating in the resistance, and sent to Midnapur Jail. In this context, we should remember that Sumit Sarkar had been arrested a few years ago, with his wife and newborn baby. He was kept in jail for over an year.

Click here for Bengali Leaflet page 1[PDF, .6 MB]
Click here for Bengali Leaflet page 2[PDF, .6 MB

Below for English:

Read this article »

Introductory Booklet on SEZs prepared by Citizens' Research Collective, New Delhi

This booklet answers basic questions such as What is a SEZ, Why SEZs, How many SEZs, What has been the experience with SEZs so far, Will SEZs create jobs. It looks at the attendant displacement and loss of livelihood, the features of the emerging new corporate-city-state, and the immense usage (upto 75%) of SEZ land for real estate. It ends with a look at the many faces of resistance to neoliberalism, like theCoca-Cola Virudha Samara Samiti, Muthanga Forest Land Struggle, protests against land acquisitions for the Bangalore-Mysore highway and mining in the Krishna river by the Reliance Group, the Dalit struggle for Gairan under the Jameen Adhikar Andolan, struggle against Reliance Gas lines in Maharashtra, the 26 Gaon Bachao Sangharsh Samiti fighting SEZ in Raigad, etc.

Click to read booklet on SEZ [PDF, 2.88MB]

Leaflet from IFTU, AICCTU, Amco Sanhati Committee, National Tannery Bachao Committee, IndoJapan Steel Employees Union, etc.

Wages to survive on, work for workers, factories on industrial land - That is what we demand.

After IndoJapan Steel closed down, workers of the factory tried all through the 1990s to get the Minister to agree to a workers cooperative. They walked down countless michhils, sent many appeals. They didn't want money - they simply wanted legal assistance from the government. These workers, who aspired to build an examplary workers intiative were converted into vagabonds. Their attempt at surviving with dignity, having control over their lives died a death in the hands of government apathy, and today the machinery has been dismantled, sold off in auction, under the protection of police. Workers have not received their 16 crore rupees in dues.
Click here to read page 1 in Bengali [PDF, 1.4 MB]
Click here to read page 2 in Bengali [PDF, 1.4 MB]
Below for English:

Read this article »

Fact-Finding Report on POSCO Project in Jagatsinghpur, Orissa

A strong people's resistance has been going on in the parts of Jagatsinghpur district of Orissa against a steel plant and captive port proposed in the area, since July 2005, a month after the Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) regarding the project was signed between the Government of Orissa and Pohang Steel Company Limited (POSCO). This fact-finding team (19-22 April) had the following objectives : to get an insight into the concerns being raised in relation to the project by the affected communities, to understand the steps being taken by the authorities concerned to address these issues, and to assess the processes that have taken place in the last two years in relation to the project.

Click to read Report [PDF, 13 pages] »

Read previous updates on state terror in Jagatsinghpur, and sign petition.

An APDR publication in Bengali - Land Acquisition in Singur, A Rights Perspective

This publication from APDR collects many documents related to Singur and Nandigram, as well as a detailed timeline. Included are fact-finding reports on the death of Rajkumar Bhul (7 pages), the original protest letter from his father Dwarikanath Bhul, a fact-finding report on Singur dated December 8th (17 pages), original Government and Tata notifications and press releases on land acquisition, APDR responses and letters, and the text of the Land Acquisition Act. Also included is an analytical piece by Amitdyuti Kumar (33 pages).

Click to read publication [PDF, 56 pages] »

Discussion Forum in Panjab University on SEZ and Nandigram - Press Clippings

Arranged by friends of Chhatra Chhatri Sanhati Mancha, Panjab

The meeting was held on April 17, 2007, in Panjab University. It was attended by around a hundred people. All the four speakers - Prof. Sumit Sarkar, Sumit Choudhury, Vaskar Nandy, and Sukhdev Singh — spoke with spirit and substance. Sardara Singh Mahal could not attend as he was unwell. The news was carried by as many as 8 newspapers of the city (English, Hindi, Punjabi put together). In this part of the country land and agriculture is an extremely emotive issue.

Click here for Press Clippings [PDF, 7 pgs] »

Petition from Little Magazine Somonnoy (group of more than 150 little magazines from Bengal)

This is to share our concern with you over the developments happening in this state in the name of industrialization, resulting in massive land-grabbing and eviction of farmers from the fertile lands. Especially, the murders at Singur and the genocide at Nandigram have broken our hearts and made us panic-stricken. We vehemently condemn these incidents and demand for severe punishment of the culprits. We would request you to intervene at your capacity, at the most, to book these murderers so that such incidents never occur in future.

Read this article »

Assorted leaflets from Sanhati Mancha, graffiti from Jadavpur University - following Nandigram massacre

This is the story of that night. The night of 14th March. The CPIM call a local 12-hour bandh after the end of "Operation Nandigram" during the day. In this remote area, where people don't come out after dark anyway, why would they call a bandh? During the day, as we had watched the police attack unfurl in all its fury, shivered in terror as we heard that perhaps sixty people had been killed, we could never have imagined that the most horrifying episodes, the most brutal events had yet to unfold.

Read the leaflet - page 1 [JPG] »
Read the leaflet - page 2 [JPG] »
Read the leaflet - page 3 [JPG] »

And now? After 14th March, after this massacre, do we not understand what Narendra Modi did in Gujarat? Have we not seen world (bank) capital, flowing out of constricted first world markets and jumping hungrily into the third world, with its allure of "industrialisation" - have we not seen what it translates to?

Sanhati Mancha Leaflet [JPG] »

Even after the massacre of Nandigram - those of you who have chosen not to choose sides - I leave behind a rifle. Kill yourself if you can.

Graffiti in Jadavpur University [JPG] »

Medical Team report in Bengali, Poster from MCDSA

Report of Team of Doctor's visit to Nandigram

On March 18, 2007, a group consisting of Sramajibi Swathya Udyog, Dr. Bhaskar Rao Janaswasthya Committee, Peoples Health, Janaswasthya Adhikar Mancha, Peoples Right to Health, and MCDSA (represented by six doctors, three junior doctors, three nurses and two health workers), visited Nandigram, Sonachura and Gokulnagar to treat people injured in the police firing of March 14th.

Click here to read latest report in English

Read their Report in Bengali- Page 1 [JPG] »
Read their Report in Bengali- Page 2 [JPG] »

Poster from MCDSA: Singur to Nandigram, Bangla will be Vietnam

Friend,
Nandigram is bleeding again. After 7th January, 14th March. The so-called "peasant-workers loving" Left Front snuffed out more than a hundred lives with their murderous police force and army of cadres. Their crime - they protested, they protested against the government's advertisement of "development and progress". Not for petty electoral games - they protested to save their land, their homes, their food, clothes, and the fundamental right to live.

Click here to read poster [JPG] »

Then Came the End of Beliefs - Pamphlet from students in JNU

Source : Anandaroop, Anil, Banojyotsna, Bodhisattva, Jeet, Kaustubhmani, Oeendrila, Sanjukta, Sukanya, Upal

Then came the end of beliefs. In our half-reached, quarter-dreamt, woken-in-between, little-believed and broadly accepted CPI (M) parenthetic lives. Development in Nandigram is now measured as the investor-friendly space between the legs of nine year old girls.

14th March. Nandigram. 100 people mowed down. Firing squads replicated.

Read this article »

Poster of Sanhati Mancha (announcing Mahamichhil), 2 posters of PDSF

In Protest of Nandigram Massacre - unite for Mahamichhil on
24th March, 1:30 p.m. , Deshbandhu Park. We invite people from every
stratum of society, and every social organisation to join us in solidarity.

Chhatra Chhatri Sanhati Mancha

Click here to see poster 1 [JPG] »
Click here to see poster of PDSF 1 [JPG] »
Click here to see poster of PDSF 2 [JPG] »

Leaflet from Chhatra Chhatri Sanhati Mancha, December 18th, 2006

The following is a leaflet announcing the first convention of the Chhatra Chhatri Sanhati Mancha, December 18th, 2006. Around 300 students from more than a dozen organisations attended the convention in Students Hall, near College Square. Speakers included Subhendu Dasgupta, Srijan Sen, representatives from all participating groups, and a number of other intellectuals. This was also the day Tapasi Malik was murdered in Singur. After the convention, hundreds of students organized into a spontaneous march down College Street, thundering slogans against the State.

Click here to read page 1 [JPG] »
Click here to read page 2 [JPG] »

Leaflet from Chhatra Chhatri Sanhati Mancha, December 28th, 2006

A leaflet from the Chhatra Chhatri Sanhati Mancha, December 28th, 2006. Around 250 students marched down Central and Southern Calcutta, carrying posters, shouting slogans, distributing leaflets. 84 were arrested near Hazra crossing. Spirits remained high, with arrested students shouting slogans from within prison vans.

Click here to read [JPG] »

Leaflet from Paramanu Chulli Birodhi Committee, Haripur.

A leaflet from the Paramanu Chulli Birodhi Committee, published by Sukumar Bhuyia, from Haripur - the site of the proposed nuclear power plant. Points discussed include the real cost of power plants (fighting State propaganda that it is cheap), the fact that power plants are expensive to keep functional (combating the myth that long-term costs are low), the real amount of coal reserves as quoted by the Geological Survey of India (fighting the popular myth that coal reserves are low and dwindling), the hazards of nuclear power (against the propaganda that it is actually safe), etc.

The leaflet ends with a passionate call to join the struggle against nuclear power in Bengal, India, and all over the world.

Click here to read page 1 [JPG] »
Click here to read page 2 [JPG] »

Leaflet from Teachers and Scientists Opposed to Mal-development

A leaflet from the Teachers and Scientists Opposed to Mal-development, published by Prof. Meher Engineer. Among various points, this leaflet busts the myth that the Tatas are a responsible corporation and their company would contribute to local development. It argues that land acquisition by large corporations is a brutal process and the only index is the profit of the company.

Click here to read page 1 [JPG] »
Click here to read page 2 [JPG] »
Click here to read page 3 [JPG] »
Click here to read page 4 [JPG] »

Appeal from MASUM (human rights organisation) on police violence, Feb 4, 2007

On 4 th of February 2007 nearly 150 villagers of Beraberi and adjoining villages under Singur Police Station assembled near the fences erected by the administration as acquired for Tata motors. The protest was a peaceful one and led by Krishi Jami Rakha Committee. When the protestors assembled at the fence at about 10.30 AM to lodge their protest and shouted slogans, a large number of police bodily resisted them.

Among many protesters, Amitabha Bhattacharya, Sudip Sarkar, Partha Chakraborty, Ajoy Das, Becharam Manna, Ganga Das, Kabita Bag, and Mamata Manna were beaten, some with serious head injuries. Anuradha Talwar of the Right to Food Network was arrested.

Click here to download the leaflet [PDF] »

Special Bulletin from Mazdoor Kranti Parishad (MKP), December 2006

Articles include : a discussion of Singur and the Posco project, and why the MKP is fighting - by Biswajit Hazra, an introduction to SEZs, a call for solidarity against the brutal murder of Tapasi Malik, an article explaining that farmers of Singur hadn't given their land (opposing State propaganda that farmers had spontaneously sold their land) - by Amrita Poira, and the two sides of "development" - "Oder Unnoyon, Amader Unnyon" - by Kushal Debnath.

Click here to download the booklet [PDF] »

Bikalpa : A publication from PDSF

A publication called Bikalpa from Progressive Democratic Students Federation (PDSF), edited by Amit, published by Sourav.

Articles include: The role of students in the movement against land acquisition (by Arijit), A summary of the movement in Nandigram (by Parag), Data analysis of land acquisition in Singur ( by MunMun), A discussion of nuclear power plants and their implications ( by Somnath), and an open letter to Tapasi Malik.

This publication came out soon after 11 students including Jishnu Dasgupta and Parag were arrested during a peaceful rally near Alimuddin Street. Many other students were beaten. Arrested students were kept in jail for a number of days.

Click here to download the booklet [PDF] »

Analytical booklet on government policy : In the Clutches of Development - Singur, Nandigram

"Unnayoner J(N)atakole Singur, Nandigram…" ( In the Clutches of Development - Singur, Nandigram…) - a booklet by academics and intellectuals.

Includes articles by Pinaki Mitra "Singur, mithye bolchhe Sarkar" (Singur - The Government is Lying), Shakti Das "CPM-er unnoyon dorshone Marx(bad)" (Marxism and the CPM's Philosophy of Development), Anindita Sanyal "Shilpayan : Bhobishyoter bhittihin swapno" (Industrialisation : The Utopia of the Future).

The first article contains detailed data analysis of the nature of land acquisition and peasant "consent" in Singur, "compensation" by the government, and an analysis of the prospect of creation of new jobs by the Tata plant there.

The second article critically examines various slogans of the State such as "Agriculture is our foundation, Industry is our Future", "Industry is needed for the uplift of peasants", "This model of Industrialisation will create jobs, reduce unemployment", "If we don't give Corporations what they want, they will go to other States", and "This is not the time for revolution, but for bargaining with world capital".

The third article contains detailed discussions of the nature of industrialisation and its relation to jobless growth.

Click here to download the booklet [PDF] »

Booklet by female activists : Singur Movement : Our Thoughts, Our Resistance

SINGUR ANDOLAN : AAMADER BHABNA AAMADER PRATIBAD
Edited by : Emancipation Publication

A compilation of articles by women intellectuals and artists. Articles range from detailed analysis of land acquisition in Singur, the nature and personalities of the struggle, to an interview of 80-year old activist Saraswati Das.

Includes pieces by Poushali Thakur, Saraswati Das, Tanika Sarkar, Minakshi Sen, Sarmistha Chaudhuri, Prathama Bandyopadhyay, Aparajita Mukherjee, Sudeshna Chakraborty, Shaoli Mitra, Miratun Nahar, Bolan Gangopadhyay, Taslima Nasreen, Saswati Ghosh, Chandreyee Niyogi, Sumita Das, Krishna Bandyopadhyay, Ishita Pain, Barnali Pain, Rajasri Mukhopadhyay, Jolly Bagchi, Chandana Mitra, Anindita Sanyal, Anuradha Deb, Chaitali Sen, Soma Mukherjee, Jashodhara Bagchi, Nandini Dhar, Susmita De, Neha Hui, Munmun.

Poems by Maitreyi Chattopadhyay, Swapna Ghosh, Susmita Bhattacharya, Swapna.

Interviews with Mahasweta Devi, Jaya Mitra.

Click here to download the booklet [PDF] »

http://sanhati.com/literature/


MAINSTREAM, VOL XLVI, NO 13

Agrarian Crisis in India is a Creation of the Policy of Globalisation

Mathew Aerthayil

The people's protest against Special Economic Zones in various parts of the country, including at Nandigram in West Bengal, stagnation in agriculture, import of foodgrains, widespread suicide of farmers—all these are systems of simmering discontent in the agricultural sector. What is highlighted today in the national scene is the image of "incredible India" and "shining India". We hear often about India as a country with a very high economic growth, a country with the highest numbers of billionaires in Asia, and a country of world renowned information technology. But we do not hear enough about the serious problems in agriculture. Those who govern us do not seem to be concerned about this problem; probably they do not want to. But we cannot easily ignore this problem any longer.

It was with the Structural Adjustment Programme (SAP) in 1991 that the policy of globalisation was concretely introduced in India. Based on this policy and the directives of the World Bank, International Monetary Fund and World Trade Organisation, the Indian economy was substantially overhauled. The Export-Import policy was liberalised; the import and customs duties of many products were drastically lowered or totally dropped so that they could be imported without any restriction. The government started reducing its investment in agriculture and the industrial sector allowing the private sector to take over. The restructuring of the public distribution system really affected the availability of foodgrains to the poor at subsidised rates. All such measures had implications for the farm sector. This article analyses how the policy of globalisation has affected agriculture in India.

Problems of Agrarian Sector and their Consequences

FIFTEEN years of economic liberalisation have adversely affected Indianagriculture. The most prominent manifestation of this is in the drastic decline in the growth rate of foodgrains. The rate of growth of agricultural output was gradually increasing in 1950-1990, and it was more than the rate of growth of the population. In the 1980s the agricultural output grew at about four per cent per annum. Thus India became self-sufficient in food and started exporting wheat and rice. But during the 10-year period after the start of liberalisation, the rate of growth declined to two per cent. According to the Mid-term Appraisal of the Tenth Five Year Plan (2002-07), the rate of growth of the GDP in agriculture and allied sectors was just one per cent per annum during the year 2002-05. As a result, per capita availability of foodgrains decreased; the growth rate of population became higher than that of foodgrains, and Indiastarted to import foodgrains at a much higher price than that in the domestic market.

Secondly, unemployment in the agricultural sector increased during the reform period as agriculture was not profitable due to the fall in the price of farm products. As a result, the number of people who are employed in the primary sector and the area under cultivation decreased, which in turn caused a decline in rural employment. According to the National Sample Survey, the annual rate of growth of the employment in the rural areas was 2.07 per cent in 1987-1984, while it declined to a mere 0.66 per cent in 1993-2000, which corresponds to the period of liberalisation. It is not only the farmers but also the Dalits and tribals, who heavily depend on agriculture, became unemployed.

The suicide of farmers is the third fall-out of stagnation in agriculture. When agriculture was not yielding remunerative income, the life of the farmers became very desperate. Many of them committed suicide as a last resort. As revealed by Sharad Pawar, the Union Agricultural Minister, in the Lok Sabha in 2004, over one lakh farmers committed suicide in India after the economic reform started. According to the National Crime Records Bureau, 17,060 farmers committed suicide in the country in 2006 with Maharashtra having the highest number of (4453) suicide deaths. Punjab is the latest in the list of States having farmers' suicide. This is a record in the agricultural history of India. It points to the acute nature of the problem which has affected the vast majority of the population, and which has created a real crisis. But unfortunately, the government and the people do not consider it a crisis; their lack of seriousness and lukewarm response to the problem points to this reality.

Reasons for the Agrarian Crisis

THERE is a need for analysing the reasons for the crisis to see whether there is any connection with globalisation and, if so, what measures could be adopted to face this challenge.

1. Liberal Import of Agricultural Products

The main reason for the crash of prices of agricultural products, especially of cash crops, in India was removal of all restrictions to import these products. As, for example, when the Government of India reduced the import duty on tea and coffee from Sri Lanka and Malaysia, their prices in the domestic market got reduced drastically. Thus cultivation of such products became unprofitable and so their production was fully or partly stopped. Since the removal of quantitative restrictions and lowering of import duties were according to the restrictions of the World Trade Organisations (WTO), the crash in the prices of agricultural products is directly related to the liberalisation policy of the government.

2. Cutback in Agricultural Subsidies

In the post-reform period the government reduced different types of subsidies to agriculture, and this has increased the production cost of cultivation. According to Ramesh Chand, an economist, cutback in subsidy and control of fertilisers over the last few years has adversely affected the agricultural sector. It has increased the input cost and made agriculture less profitable. Since the decrease in subsidy to agriculture is part of the regulations of the WTO, it is related to the policy of globalisation.

3. Lack of Easy and Low-cost Loan to Agriculture

After 1991 the lending pattern of commercial banks, including nationalised banks, to agriculture drastically changed with the result that loan was not easily available and the interest was not affordable. This has forced the farmers to rely on moneylenders and thus pushed up the expenditure on agriculture. The National Commission for Agriculture, headed by Dr M.S. Swaminathan, also pointed out that removal of the lending facilities and concessions of banks during the post-reform period have accelerated the crisis in agriculture. When the farmers were not able to pay back loan with high interest, they fell into the debt trap. Studies show that most of the farmers' suicides was due to the debt trap. It is part of the policy of privatisation that banks, even nationalised banks, look for profit over their social responsibilities to the people.

4. Decline in Government Investment in the Agricultural Sector

Studies show that after the economic reforms started, the government's expenditure and investment in the agricultural sector have been drastically reduced. This is based on the policy of minimum intervention by the government enunciated by the policy of globalisation. The expenditure of the government in rural development, including agriculture, irrigation, flood control, village industry, energy and transport, declined from an average of 14.5 per cent in 1986-1990 to six per cent in 1995-2000. When the economic reforms started, the annual rate of growth of irrigated land was 2.62 per cent; later it got reduced to 0.5 per cent in the post-reform period. The consequences were many. The rate of capital formation in agriculture came down, and the agricultural growth rate was also reduced. This has affected the purchasing power of the rural people and subsequently their standard of living.

5. Restructuring of the Public Distribution System (PDS)

As part of the neo-liberal policy, the government restructured the PDS by creating two groups—Below Poverty Line (BPL) and Above Poverty Line (APL)—and continuously increased the prices of foodgrains distributed through ration shops. As a result, even the poor people did not buy the subsidised foodgrains and it got accumulated in godowns to be spoiled or sold in the open market. As the in-take from PDS was less it has affected the food security of the poor, especially in the rural areas, and this has indirectly affected the market and the farmers.

6. Special Economic Zones

As part of the economic reforms, the system of taking over land by the government for commercial and industrial purposes was introduced in the country. As per the Special Economic Zones Act of 2005, the government has so far notified about 400 such zones in the country. Very often it is fertile land which has been acquired. According to Khasanoki, a writer, the government has acquired five million hectares of land for purposes other than agriculture between 1991 and 2003. This is almost half of what was acquired during the last 40 years. It was in the news that the government decided to acquire 10,120 hectares of land near Mumbai (almost one-third area of Mumbai) for the Reliance Company and reduced it to 5000 hectors due to public pressure. Since the SEZ deprives the farmers of their land and livelihood, it is harmful to agriculture. In order to promote export and industrial growth in line with globalisation the SEZ was introduced in many countries.

Towards a Solution

THE agricultural crisis is affecting a majority of the people in India. The farmers who produce food materials for the country are in deep distress. The marginalised people like the Dalits and tribals, who depend on agriculture, are getting unemployed and struggling for their livelihood. The ordinary people, especially the poor, have lost their food security. The crisis in agriculture is acrisis of the country as a whole and so needs urgent attention. Some of the suggestions are being listed here.

1. Quantitative restrictions should be imposed on import of agricultural products. Since the import policy was the major reason for the crash in prices of many agricultural products, there should be restrictions on the quantity and customs duty of such products. Necessary import duty and quantitative restrictions should be imposed on imported goods to protect our farmers who should be given priority to the discipline of the WTO.

2. Subsidy and concessions given to agriculture but removed in the post-reform period should be restored. This is a must to make agriculture remunerative. One of the main disputes in the Doha Round of talks at the WTO is the high subsidy given by the United States and European Union to their farmers in spite of the WTO regulation. India should assert its right to give sufficient subsidy to its farmers to offset the rising cost of cultivation and protect their livelihood.

3. Bank loans should be easily made available to the farmers, especially since the input cost of agriculture has gone up. The government should seriously think of restoring the low rate of interest to farmers given by banks and other financial institutions as it had done before the reform period. In fact, the M.S. Swaminathan Commission for Agriculture has recommended a low rate of four per cent interest for the farmers.

4. The government should augment its investment and expenditure in the farm sector. One reason for the agricultural stagnation is low government expenditure. Investment in agriculture and its allied sectors, including irrigation, transport, communication and farm research, should be drastically increased, and the government should aim at integrated development of the rural areas. Effecting Implementation of National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme can also become a means of revival of the rural economy.

5. There is a need for periodic revision of the procurement prices for farm produce making those remunerative. This will help the farmers to meet the increasing expenses for farm inputs and ensure at least remunerative income. According to the Swaminathan Commission, unless agriculture is made a profitable enterprise, its present crisis cannot be solved. The Commission has suggested 50 per cent more of the total production cost as supportive price for foodgrains.

6. The government should revise the policy on Special Economic Zones as it goes against the interest of farmers and the agricultural sector. It should not acquire fertile agricultural land for SEZs. When it does take over land for essential public utilities, it should give just compensation and initiate comprehensive rehabilitation measures. The recommendations of the Swamina-than Commission not to acquire land suitable for agriculture for non-agricultural purposes, to give adequate compensation for the acquired land and to distribute surplus land to the landless farmers should be seriously taken into account when the policy of SEZs is reframed. Over and above the policy of SEZs, there is a need for constitutional structures and mechanisms which will mandate the government, both Central and States, to implement the policy of relief and rehabilitation of people displaced due to SEZs and other developmental projects.

7. Bold steps should be taken to implement land reforms which were not implemented in most States. Feudal structures and landlordism based on large holdings of land by high caste and class people even now tend to keep a majority of the people, especially Dalits and backward castes, in the rural areas under their control and domination. Neo-liberal policies with privatisation will only reinforce and strengthen these unjust and exploitative structures. Therefore, there is a need for conscious efforts and positive steps from the government side to implement land reforms. Surplus land acquired thus should be distributed to the Dalit and adivasi farmers. According to Amartya Sen, the Nobel Laureate, though the economic growth rate of India is impressive, Indiacannot play a significant role in the global economic scenario unless it completes land reforms.

8. The rural economy, particularly agriculture, will be greatly benefit if programmes meant for economically backward sections, including the Integrated Child Development Schemes, mid-day meals for schoolchilden and the National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme, are effectively implemented. Food security of the poor will be ensured if the public distribution system is efficiently run. All these programmes will increase the purchasing power of the rural people and indirectly help agriculture itself.

The agricultural sector in India is facing a crisis today. The globalisation process, which started in the 1990s, is the main reason for this crisis. The solution of the problem is not in a few "packages" but in drastic changes in the present economic policies related to agriculture. For this, the government should be ready to take bold steps. Farmers, agricultural labourers and people's organisations in civil society should work collectively to assist and persuade the government to make the necessary changes. It is high time that the government and the people realised that India can become a real "superpower" only when the vast majority of the people, especially the farmers in the rural areas, become prosperous and are really empowered. The words of Dr M.S. Swaminathan are relevant here: "In a country where 60 per cent of people depend on agriculture for their livelihood, it is better to become an agricultural force based on food security rather than a nuclear force."

Dr Mathew Aerthayil is the Director of the Indian Social Institute, Bangalore.

http://www.mainstreamweekly.net/article588.html


MAINSTREAM, VOL XLVII, NO 35, AUGUST 15, 2009 (INDEPENDENCE DAY SPECIAL)

Why We Must Oppose the Land Acquisition(Amendment) Bill of 2009

D. Bandyopadhyay

A law is amended generally to bring in improvement or to be in conformity with some important judicial decisions. The Land Acquisition (LA) Act of 1894 does require revision to conform to the current-day situation. So far, there could not be any objection.

But the way the amendments have been made looks as if we are going back on time. There are certain undesirable features which require to be highlighted. Under the theory of Eminent Domain, private property could be taken over only for public purpose. The LA Act defines 'Public Purpose' in Section 3(l) and it includes eight points. Among these points are: improvement of village sites; planned development of town and rural areas; provision of land for the landlessor people staying in natural calamity affected areas and for persons affected by development projects. The impact of the Nehruvian philosophy is clearly discernible. In the amendments suggested, all these beneficial, pro-poor and pro-rural areas points have been omitted. 'Public Purpose' now consists of basically two items: (i) strategy related issues; and (ii) infrasructure. There cannot be any quarrel about these two points. But the third point is sinister and dangerous. It relates to any project of general public use (not public purpose) undertaken by 'a person' for which he has purchased or negotiated to purchase 70 per cent of the land and the remaining 30 per cent would be acquired by the state. The definition of a 'person' makes one's flesh crib. It says, a 'person' means a company, association of persons, a body of persons whether incorporated or not. It means basically the corporate sector has been given a free hand in acquiring whatever land they like, a part of which will be through negotiations but the more difficult part would be through state intervention.

There are several points involved in it. First, will this law supersede and/or over-ride State land reform laws relating to land ceiling? While a company as a legal entity can purchase land up to the ceiling limit it has no right to cross the limit. But the amendment as drafted seems to give them that right. This is not acceptable. Secondly, if the government has to acquire 30 per cent of the land, the government should have a right to know whether the project for which theland is to be acquired is a necessary project for the planned development of the country. Without a preliminary scrutiny of the project how could a private company stampede the government to procure for it the remaining 30 per cent through a coercive law? It means that the government is moving away from the concept of public purpose for acquisition of private land to the concept of private purpose for making profit by corporate bodies. Public purpose and private purpose are logically contradictory terms. By this process, the government is handing over the entire development projects, including social welfare projects, to the private sector. And the private sector either would not come for social development projects or if they came they would do so at a price which would exclude the most vulnerable sections of the Indian population. This goes against the whole spirit of the Directive Principles of State Policy contained in Part IV of the Constitution of India. Another point to be mentioned here is that while the government is omitting 'Company' in the Preamble to the amending Act, they are handing over the whole process to the corporate sector through the back door. This is nothing short of a fraud.

Another major defect of the amending Bill is that it has not elaborated on the concept of compensation. Land is being treated, as before, as an item of property. But in an agriculture-based economy like India, land is a productive asset which gives livelihood to many persons other than the owner. In fact, there is a rule of thumb ratio of 1:4 in the matter of employment and livelihood in respect of land. After all the civil unrest and movement regarding compulsoryacquisition, the government should have thought about loss of livelihood also as an element to be compensated for. This is not there in this Bill.

The third major lacuna in the bill is that it has not provided for any protection for the Scheduled Tribes. There are many protective laws for the Scheduled Tribes, including the Fifth Schedule of the Constitution which gives enormous powers to the Governor to negate any harmful effect of any law on the Scheduled Tribes. The Extension of Panchayats to the Scheduled Area Act (PESA) gives a lot of power to the Gram Sabha keeping in mind the tribal tradition. The Samtha judgement of the Supreme Court in 1997 recognises the right of the tribals over the minerals and other natural resources. The Scheduled Tribe and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Rights) Act 2006 gives them right of cultivation and continued possession of forest lands. This amending Bill without mentioning any one of these beneficial laws seems to bulldoze all of them to the detriment of the interests of the Scheduled Tribes. It would only create more bad blood between the Scheduled Tribes and others because of the overriding provisions relating to their benefits. This amendment Bill should incorporate the important beneficial aspects of all these laws mentioned above and provide protection to tribals. Incidentally, the current Naxalite movement of the Central Indian hills almost corresponds with the area with major tribal population of the country. The displaced tribals numbering two crores constitute the base of the extremist movement in these areas. So, to contain the violence, in addition to the police action, definite ameliorating measures have to be taken. The law is totally silent on it.

THE principal issue in the current Land Acquisition Act is that it does not provide for any exit. Land might have been acquired for a project. What would happen if the project gets dropped or is abandoned? This is precisely what happened in Singur. Nine hundred and ninetyseven acres were acquired forcefully for setting up a small car factory by Messrs Tata Motors. Messrs Tata Motors abandoned the project in October 2008. What happens to the land? The law is silent. In the early 1950s, the West Bengal Government gave 750 acres of prime land between the GT Road and the main Eastern Railway line in the district of Hooghly for setting up an automobile factory by the Birlas. In 50 years, the company could not use more than 300 acres leaving 450 acres fallow. Is it not a national waste that a prime land amounting to 450 acres could neither be used for agriculture nor for any industrial purpose for half-a-century? Thus, there are various ways in which acquired lands are wasted. The new law should provide for a simple exit policy for return of the acquired landto the original owners if the project is abandoned, or the scope of the project is changed, reducing the requirement of land or for excess land acquired through overestimation of requirement.

The Rehabilitation and Resettlement (R&R) Policy of 2007 clearly mentions the principle of three 'minima'. These are: (i) minimise displace-ment; (ii) minimiseacquisition of land, and (iii) minimise agricultural land for non-agricultural use. The proposed amendment does not contain these principles. It only leaves to the Scrutiny Committee to take a view which is entirely discretionary. These principles of three minima should be incorporated as a part of the law to prevent misuse of this law for acquisition of more land than whatever the project requires.

If the country could wait from 1894 to 2009 for a major overhaul of the LA Act, it can wait another couple of years to cure the infirmities mentioned above. The Bill has to be redrafted and placed before the public for an open debate before it is placed before Parliament for enactment.

The author is a former Secretary, Rural Development, Government of India, and the architect of 'Operation Barga' that changed the face of the West Bengal countryside.

http://www.mainstreamweekly.net/article1586.html

Nandigram violence

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Nandigram violence was an incident in NandigramWest Bengal where, on the orders of the Left Front government, more than 4,000 heavily armed police stormed the Nandigram area with the aim of stamping out protests against the West Bengal government's plans to expropriate 10,000 acres (40 km2) of land for a Special Economic Zone (SEZ) to be developed by the Indonesian-based Salim Group. The police shot dead at least 14 villagers and wounded 70 more.

The SEZ controversy started when the government of West Bengal decided that the Salim Group of Indonesia[1][2][3] would set up a chemical hub under the SEZ policy at Nandigram, a rural area in the district of Purba Medinipur. The villagers took over the administration of the area and all the roads to the villages were cut off. A front-page story in the Kolkata newspaper, The Telegraph, on 4 January 2007 was headlined, "False alarm sparks clash". According to the newspaper that village council meeting at which the alleged land seizure was to be announced was actually a meeting to declare Nandigram a "clean village", that is, a village in which all the households had access to toilet facilities. However, later events indicate that the government had in fact decided to set up the chemical hub and the villagers' concerns were genuine. The administration was directed to break the Bhumi Uchhed Pratirodh Committee's (BUPC) resistance at Nandigram and a massive operation with at least 3,000 policemen along with armed cadre of the Marxist ruling party was launched on 14 March 2007. However, prior information of the impending action had leaked out to the BUPC who amassed a crowd of roughly 2,000 villagers at the entry points into Nandigram with women and children forming the front ranks. In the resulting mayhem, at least 14 people were killed.

Contents

 [hide]

[edit]Background

[edit]The events of 14 March 2007

The administration was directed to break the BUPC's resistance at Nandigram and a massive operation with at least 3,000 policemen was launched on 14 March 2007. It was reported that "A group of armed and trained CPI(M) cadres wore police uniforms and joined the forces[4]. However, prior information of the impending action had leaked out to the BUPC who amassed a crowd of roughly 2,000 villagers at the entry points into Nandigram with women and children forming the front ranks. In the police firing, at least 14 people were killed".[5]

Immediately following the 14 March killings, voluntary teams of doctors visited the Nandigram health centre, the district hospital at Tamlukand later, the SSKM hospital and compiled a comprehensive report[6]

Few journalists were able to access the area, with their access being restricted by 'checkposts' manned by CPI(M) cadres[7]; two belonging to a news channel were briefly abducted[8].

The scale of the action left the state stunned. All India Trinamool Congress estimates put the toll at 50. The PWD Minister of the Government of West Bengal, Mr. Kshiti Goswami of the Revolutionary Socialist Party (India) (RSP), a Left Front constituent, said 50 bodies were taken to hospital, but it was impossible to ascertain how many were actually dead.[9] In response to this, people singled out as CPI(M) members and supporters and their families were driven out of the area and the houses burnt. A week after the 14 March clashes, The Hindu estimated that around 3500 persons had been displaced into relief camps as a result of threats from BUPC.[10]. Accusations by Trinamool Congress that hundreds of people have been killed in the event were not confirmed by facts. Two of the supposed victims, as claimed by Trinamool Congress, were later found in a completely safe place elsewhere in West Bengal.

The CPI(M) has accused the Jami Raksha Committee - a coalition of activists from various parties who oppose land acquisition - of armed attacks on relief camps which led to three deaths as well as a series of murders and a gangrape.[11]

Fresh violence erupted in Nandigram on 29 April caused the West Bengal Human Rights Commission to step in.[12]. A team of intellectuals and theatre personalities from Calcutta was attacked by CPM cadre on their return trip after disbursing relief material collected from the people in various parts of the state.[13]. Those activists later publicly supported opposition party Trinamool Congress in 2009 Parliament Election.

The deaths in Nandigram have led to a great deal of controversy on the left in India.[14] The federal police say they have recovered many bullets of a type not used by police but in widespread use in the underworld.[15]

[edit]Reactions

Gopal Krishna Gandhi, The Congress-i Governor of West Bengal criticised the state government over its handling of the Nandigram incident, speaking of his "cold horror" in a press statement. However, The same Governor did not utter a word against the violence committed on the families of CPIM & Other LF supporters.

Dr. Ashok Mitra, long time Finance Minister of the Government of West Bengal (and a veteran CPI(M) leader) criticized the government and his party stating that till death he will remain guilty to his conscience if he keeps mum on the happenings in Nandigram. He states that the CPI(M) leadership is blind of hubris and the party has turned into a wide open field of flatterers and court jesters dominated by 'anti-socials'[16].

An editorial in The Indian Express said that the party machinery has become the "sword arm of an industrialisation policy that involves settling complicated property rights issues."[17]

Renowned novelist Sunil Gangopadhyay, a friend of the Chief Minister Buddhadeb Bhattacharya also felt that the industry is necessary but state violence was barbaric. [18] Social activist Medha Patkar had visited Nandigram on 7 December 2006 to protest against land acquisition.[19] Other renowned persons who joined protests against the project and the actions carried out on 14 March 2007 to implement it include Magsaysay and Jnanpeeth Award-winning author Mahasweta DeviBooker Prize-winner Arundhati Roy, film director and actressAparna Sen, theater personalities Shaonli Mitra and Bibhas Chakraborty, painter Suvaprasanna, songwriter and singer Kabir Suman and many others. Later on, Kabir Suman became a parliamentarian in Trinamool congress ticket and almost everybody else found place in some committees in Central Ministry. CPI(M) has alleged that they were paid back by Mamata Banerjee for their support to her.

The CPI(M) has currently adopted the public position that land acquisition will not be made without the consent of the people of Nandigram. The proposed SEZ has ostensibly been shelved following the 14 March police action.[20] The local, district and State administration have however maintained that the Chemical Hub will take place at Nandigram itself. The PWD Minister of the Government of West Bengal, Mr. Kshiti Goswami has also come out against the CPI (M) stating that the CPI (M) is determined to set up the chemical hub at Nandigram, despite all the protests[21].

The latest drubbing that the Buddhadeb Bhattacharya government's 14 March action received was from the High Court at Calcutta, when, on 16.11.2007, a Division Bench consisting of The Hon'ble Chief Justice S. S. Nijjar, and the Hon'ble Justice Pinaki Chandra Ghose, declared that "The action of the police department to open fire at Nandigram on 14.03.2007 was wholly unconstitutional and cannot be justified under any provision of the law" and further that "The action of the police cannot be protected or justified on the ground of sovereign immunity." and also that "The action of the police cannot be justified even under the provisions of Criminal Procedure Code; The Police Act, 1861 for The Police Regulations, 1943". The Hon'ble judges also ordered that "we direct the State of West Bengal to pay to the victims of the deceased as a result of the undiscriminating police firing on 14th of March, 2007 immediate compensation in the sum of Rs.5 (five) lakhs each" and further that "We further direct the State Government to pay immediate compensation to the persons who were injured and whose particulars have been given the pleadings sum of Rs. not less than 1 (one) lakh each" and also "We further direct the State Government to pay compensation to the victims of rape who have been duly identified in the pleadings a sum of Rs.2 (two) lakhs each".

Amnesty International expressed serious concern that the Government of West Bengal has not taken the necessary concrete steps to ensure that all persons under its jurisdiction are protected from forced eviction and displacement, and that all those forcibly displaced during the violence are ensured at the very least minimum essential levels of food, shelter, water and sanitation, health care and education, as well as their right to voluntary return or resettlement, and reintegration [22].

[edit]Location shift

After the bloodshed at Nandigram, and the stiff resistance from opposition parties such as All India Trinamool Congress and Socialist Unity Centre of India (Communist) (SUCI) and Left Front partners such as Revolutionary Socialist Party and All India Forward Bloc over land acquisition, chief minister Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee on 3 September expressed the government's preference for the sparsely populated island of Nayachar, 30 kilometres from Haldia, to set up the much talked-about chemical hub.[23],[24]

[edit]November 2007 violence

A fresh round of violence came up in November 2007, as the villagers who were thrown out of Nandigram by the BUPC returned back home. The return of the villagers was marred by violence unleashed by the ruling party cadres over the resisting BUPC cadre in Nandigram. The media termed this return as a "recapture" by the CPI(M)[25]. Evidence points to the operation being conducted entirely by the party keeping the state administration inactive. The party eulogized the operation with its state chairman describing it as `a new dawn' and the chief minister as `paying them back in their own coin'[26]. The last comment was directed presumably primarily at the Maoist activists who, the CPI(M) claims, were active at Nandigram. The government has however officially contradicted the claim[27]. The situation was described as one of "Red Terror".[28] Social activist Medha Patkar in a message to National Human Rights Commission of India said that war like situation prevailed in Nandigram due to presence of thousands of CPM cadres. Police officers were present in the area, but supported their programme to attack Nandigram.[29]

The new offensive has resulted in protests throughout India[30]. On 12 November 2007, the National Human Rights Commission has issued a notice to the West Bengal Government directing it to submit a factual report on the conditions prevailing in Nandigram.[31] Film directorAparna Sen and Rituporno Ghosh decided to boycott the film festival in Kolkata in protest.[32] Aparna Sen said, "Nandigram has become a slaughter house with blood being shed every day. CPM might be at the helm of affairs but the state still belongs to us."[32]

The Parliament of India decided to discuss Nandigram with urgency, suspending the regular question hour sessions, on 21st November 2007 after two days of complete suspension of the proceedings owing to the heated debates between CPI(M) and opposition party members in both the houses. CPI(M) was alienated in the issue by all the other ruling United Progressive Alliance allies considering the fierce nationwide sentiments against the massacre [33]

[edit]2008 violence

In May 2008, fresh violence broke out in Nandigram between supporters of the Bhumi Uchhed Pratirodh Committee, and the CPM activists. Both sides exchanged fire and hurled bombs at each other, with CPM getting the worst of it.[34] It finally led to the re-capture of the lost base by BUPC aided by the District Trinamool Congress led by Subhendu Adhikary. A status quo has been reserved since then and Nandigram remains a Trinamool stronghold, albeit by force of arms.

On 5 May, CPI(M) mob striped three woman activists of Bhumi Uchhed Pratirodh Committee when they refused to join a rally organized by CPI(M).[35],[36]. Owing to wide political and civil protests on the incident the Government of West Bengal ordered a CID probe into the incident.[37],[38]. CPM leaders denied the allegations, claiming that it was part of a malicious campaign.[36].

Union Information and Broadcasting Minister Priyaranjan Dasmunsi and a section of intellectuals including Aparna Sen from Kolkata, in separate press statements, demanded that panchayat polls, due on 11th May, in the areas falling within the jurisdiction of the Nandigram thana be deferred, for, elections might not be "peaceful and democratic".[39]

[edit]2008 Elections

[edit]Panchayat

The electorate of Nandigram reacted strongly against the Left Front government's policy of industrialisation through farmland acquisition and its continuous terror tactics. In a major setback for the ruling CPI(M) for the first time in the history of Left regime in the West Bengal the opposition wrested control of the East Midnapore Zilla Parishad by bagging 35 seats out of 53 Zilla Parishad seats in the elections that were held on 11 May 2008. In the previous panchayat polls in 2003, the Trinamul Congress had only two seats out of 51 Zilla Parishad seats. The results of the election are:

In all four seats of Nandigram - I and II blocks, which saw violence after protests against the government's bid for land acquisition for a chemical hub, the Trinamul candidates have won the polls by defeating the CPI(M) candidates including a heavyweight leader. Sheikh Sufian, a Bhumi Uchhed Pratirodh Committee leader backed by the Trinamul, defeated his rival CPI(M) candidate Ashok Jana by a margin of over 13,000 votes while Pijush Bhunia, another Trinamul leader defeated Ashok Bera, a CPI(M) zonal committee secretary by over 2,100 votes.[40]

[edit]Assembly

Firoza Bibi (whose son, a recorded criminal, was killed in shooting by police) of Trinamool Congress won the Nandigram assembly by-election with a margin of 39,551 votes defeating the ruling front's candidate Paramananda Bharati.[41],[42]

[edit]External links

[edit]References

  1. ^ For more information on the Salim Group please see Sudono Salim
  2. ^ Asia Week
  3. ^ Far Easter Economic Review October 1998
  4. ^ The Telegraph
  5. ^ "Red-hand Buddha: 14 killed in Nandigram re-entry bid"The Telegraph. 15 March 2007. Retrieved 2007-03-15.
  6. ^ Medical Team Report from Nandigram with names, locations, and injuries - April 5.
  7. ^ The Times of India 15 March 2007 Nandigram: Mediapersons roughed up by CPM activists
  8. ^ Tara TV
  9. ^ Nandigram turns Blood Red
  10. ^ "Nandigram victims narrate their tales of woe"The Hindu(Chennai, India). 21 March 2007.
  11. ^ nandigram
  12. ^ Zee News
  13. ^ Sify
  14. ^ "Nandigram and the deformations of the Indian left".International Socialism. 2 July 2007.
  15. ^ BBC
  16. ^ Dr. Ashok Mitra (Former Left Front Finance Minister) on Nandigram
  17. ^ Indian Express
  18. ^ Daily India
  19. ^ India eNews.com 7 December 2006
  20. ^ The Statesman
  21. ^ WB PWD Minister against CPI(M)
  22. ^ Report on Nandigram by Amnesty International: Urgent need to address large scale human rights abuses during Nandigram recapture
  23. ^ Nandigram Chemical hub shifted
  24. ^ Nandigram will remain a black mark
  25. ^ [1]
  26. ^ NDTV November 14, 2007
  27. ^ Sify.com November 13, 2007
  28. ^ "Red terror continues Nandigram's bylanes".
  29. ^ "NHRC sends notice to Chief Secretary, West Bengal, on Nandigram incidents: investigation team of the Commission to visit the area".
  30. ^ Nandigram | Top News
  31. ^ National Human Rights Commission
  32. a b "CPM cadres kill 3 in Nandigram".
  33. ^ Lok Sabha to discuss Nandigram today
  34. ^ Fresh violence in Nandigram, two injuredThe Times of India. 5 May 2008.
  35. ^ CPM mob strips woman in Nandigram, probe onThe Times of India. 7 May 2008.
  36. a b Women activists blame CPM of beating in NandigramThe Economic Times. 7 May 2008.
  37. ^ CID probe ordered into stripping of women at NandigramSify News. 7 May 2008.
  38. ^ Intellectuals Meet West Bengal Poll Panel Over Nandigram.News Post India. 7 May 2008.
  39. ^ Fresh attempt to cut off Nandigram.The Hindu. 7 May 2007
  40. ^ [2]The Statesman.
  41. ^ Nandigram nightmare continues for CPM, Trinamool wins Assembly bypoll
  42. ^ Trinamool Congress wins Nandigram assembly by-election

  1. [PDF] 

    PCPIR Policy

    File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - Quick View
    and other clearances, as well as development of the PCPIR, at ...development and management of the PCPIR, with functions as detailed below. ...
    chemicals.nic.in/PCPIRPolicy.pdf - Similar
  2. Govt launches PCPIR policy, hopes to attract $20 billion

    9 May 2007 ... Financial express latest business and finance news: Govt launches PCPIR policy, hopes to attract $20 billion.
    www.financialexpress.com/news/govt...pcpir...to.../198796/ -Cached - Similar
  3. Visakhapatnam Urban Development Authority - APPCPIR

    Visakhapatnam Urban Development Authority - An Organization dedicated for urban development.
    www.vuda.org/pcpir/index.html - Cached - Similar
  4. ______ » PCPIR

    The PCPIR policy is a window to ensure the adoption of a holistic approach to the development of global scale industrial clusters in the petroleum, ...
    www.orissalinks.com/orissagrowth/topics/...and.../pcpir -Cached - Similar
  5. Fifth PCPIR to come up in Tamil Nadu - Money - DNA

    21 Jan 2011 ... The Union government will give its approval for the fifth Petroleum, Chemicals and Petrochemical Investment Region (PCPIR), in Cuddalore in ...
    www.dnaindia.com › MONEY - Cached
  6. CCEA clears PCPIR project at Paradip - Economic Times

    20 Aug 2010 ... BHUBANESWAR: Decks are cleared for Petroleum, Chemicals and Petrochemicals Investment Region (PCPIR) project in Orissa near Paradip, ...
    articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com › Collections › Paradip -Cached
  7. Decision on PCPIR Master Plan consultant soon

    2 Feb 2010 ... Vizag News - Decision on PCPIR Master Plan consultant soon Five bids received in response to call for expression of interest.
    www.vizagnews.com/pcpir-master-plan-consultant.htm -Cached - Similar
  8. PCPIR Kakinada SEZ - AndhraNews.com

    3 posts - 2 authors - Last post: 16 Mar
    PCPIR is different and thermal plants are different. Vizag has hilly range which will contain the heat and humidity, but kakinada cannot...
    www.andhranews.com/sutra40658.html - Cached
  9. NKID ropes in France's Air Liquide for PCPIR gas network

    14 Sep 2010 ... New Kolkata International Development (NKID) has entered into a memorandum of understanding (MoU) with Air Liquide of France, ...
    www.business-standard.com › Home › Economy & Policy - Cached
  10. India's fifth PCPIR to be located in Tamil Nadu get approval

    3 May 2011 ... India's fifth Petroleum, Chemicals and Petrochemical Investment Region (PCPIR) to come up in Tamil Nadu has been granted approval by the ...
    www.plastemart.com/plasticnews_desc.asp?news_id=19808 -


    1. Rajasthan bags first National Manufacturing &Investment Zone ...

      22 Jan 2010 ... UPA Government has decided to set up the firstNational Manufacturing and Investment Zone (NMIZ) in Rajasthan along the Delhi-Mumbai ...
      www.thehindu.com › News › States › Other States -Cached - Similar
    2. National Manufacturing Investment Zone (nmiz) : Budget 2011

      30 Apr 2011 ... National Manufacturing Investment Zone (nmiz) : Budget 2011- Latest News from India Union Budget 2011-2012.
      www.moneycontrol.com/.../national-manufacturing-investment-zone-(nmiz)/ - Cached
    3. National Manufacturing and Investment Zones - Search Results >>

      The proposed National Manufacturing and Investment Zones(NMIZ) would catalyse the manufacturing sector growth in the state. The zones offer a ...
      www.business-standard.com/.../search_news.php?...National%20Manufacturing%20and%20Investment%20Zone...Cached - Similar
    4. Govt mulls special zones to promote manufacturing

      2 Apr 2010 ... The government today proposed setting up National...
      www.business-standard.com › Home › Economy & Policy -Cached - Similar
    5. The Hindu Business Line : Manufacturing zones will lead to tech ...

      2 Apr 2010... proposed national manufacturing and investment zones will lead to ... Investment Zones (NMIZs) to push the manufacturing share in GDP. ...
      www.thehindubusinessline.in/2010/04/02/.../2010040253880700.htmCached
    6. Investment News India update & National Manufacturing and ...

      In a plan to encourage more investments, the government plans to set up National Manufacturing and Investments Zones across India. These Zones are meant to ...
      www.investinindia.com/.../investment-news-india-update-national-manufacturing-and-investments-zones-across-india - Cached
    7. Govt mulls China-like mega manufacturing hubs - Economic Times

      1 Apr 2011 ... NEW DELHI: In an attempt to make India a manufacturing powerhouse ... seeks to create National Manufacturing and Investment Zones, or NMIZs. ...
      articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com › Collections - Cached
    8. Centre moots national policy to spur manufacturingsector

      Apart from common infrastructure and support services, National Manufacturing & Investment Zones (NMIZs) would boast of high-class infrastructure, ...
      www.deccanherald.com › Business - Cached - Similar

    Jaitapur Nuclear Power Project

    From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
    Jaitapur Nuclear Power Project
    Nuclear power plant symbol
    Nuclear power plant symbol
    Jaitapur Nuclear Power Project is located in India
    Location of Jaitapur Nuclear Power Project
    CountryIndia
    Coordinates16°59′0″N 73°35′6″ECoordinates16°59′0″N 73°35′6″E
    StatusReceived Conditional environmental clearance
    Construction costIndian Rupee ₹112,000 crore (US$24.86 billion)[1]
    Owner(s)Nuclear Power Corporation of India
    Reactor information
    Reactors planned6 x 1650 MW
    Reactor type(s)European Pressurized Reactor/Evolutionary Power Reactor
    Reactor supplier(s)France Areva
    Power generation information
    Maximum capacity9900 MW
    As of March 19, 2011

    Jaitapur Nuclear Power Project (Marathiजैतापूर अणुऊर्जा प्रकल्प) is a new proposed 9900 MW power project of Nuclear Power Corporation of India (NPCIL) at Madban village of Ratnagiri district in Maharashtra.[2] It will be the largest nuclear powergenerating station in the world by net electrical power rating once completed.[3][4]

    On December 6, 2010 agreement was signed for the construction of first set of two third-generation European Pressurized Reactors/Evolutionary Power Reactors (EPR)and the supply of nuclear fuel for 25 years in the presence of French President Nicolas Sarkozy and Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh.[5]

    French nuclear engineering firm Areva S.A. and Indian state-owned nuclear operatorNuclear Power Corporation of India signed this multi billion valued agreement of about $9.3 billion. This is a general framework agreement along with agreement on 'Protection of Confidentiality of Technical Data and Information Relating to Nuclear Power Corporation in the Peaceful Uses of Nuclear Energy' was also signed.[6][7][8][9][10] The general framework agreement is a list of the scope of work, terms and conditions of plant life, guarantees and warrantees, guaranteed plant load factor. This agreement is quite important since life of the reactors is anticipated at 60 years. This general framework agreement will also include financial aspect of the project including the terms and conditions of funding, debt funding. Etc.. [11]

    The cost of building the plant is about Rs 20 crore/MWe capacity compared with Rs 5 crore/MWe for a coal power station.[12]

    The cost of electricity from this power plant will be below Indian Rupee ₹4 (US$0.09) per Kilowatt hour.[9]

    It is one of several nuclear power projects being undertaken in a thin strip of coast ofRaigadRatnagiri and Sindhudurg districts. The total power generating capacity proposed on a narrow strip of coastal land 50 kilometres (31 mi) to 90 kilometres (56 mi) km wide and 200 kilometres (120 mi) long is around 33,000 MW.[2][13] The prospect of nuclear power generation in India received a boost after the Indo US Civilian Nuclear Agreement became operational in October 2008. India has also signed similar agreements with France and Russia.[14][15][16]

    Contents

     [hide]

    [edit]Geography

    The proposed Jaitapur Nuclear Power Project is located at 16.59°N 73.35°E. It has an average elevation of 90 feet (27 m). This project will spread over 968 hectares (3.74 sq mi; 9.68 km2) of land. Jaitapur is on the Arabian Sea coast in Ratnagiri district in the southwestern part ofMaharashtraIndia. The district is a part of Konkan in Western Ghats. In 2006, India applied to the UNESCO MAB for the Western Ghats to be listed as a protected World Heritage Site.[17][18] The Sahyadri Mountain range forms the eastern boundary of the Konkan, and the Arabian Sea marks the western boundary. Jaitapur was one of the important ports in ancient and early medieval times.[19]

    [edit]Reactors

    It is proposed to construct 6 European Pressurized Reactors designed and developed by Areva of France, each of 1650 megawatts, thus totaling 9900 megawatts. These are the third generation pressurized water reactors (PWR).

    Estimated cost of this project is around Indian Rupee ₹100,000 crore (US$22.2 billion). This type of reactor is not currently operational anywhere in the world.[20][21] The United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission had expressed concerns about the safety of the computer system in this reactor, but Finland has ordered one such reactor nonetheless.[20] The Finnish Olkiluoto 3 plant is currently under construction, but has experienced severe delays in construction. Moreover, China has signed the agreement with Areva for three such reactors.[20] Also, all hurdles to the Jaitapur project were cleared when a memorandum of understanding was signed between the Indian and French governments and an agreement between Areva, a French state run company, and the Nuclear Power Corporation of India during French President Nicolas Sarkozy's visit to India during December 2010.[22]

    [edit]Funding

    A consortium of French financial institutions will finance this project as a loan. Both French and Indian government will give sovereign guarantee for this loan. The extent of guarantee will depend on what portion of the cost the French credit will cover. The Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) will govern the interest rates and other terms of agreement. Interest rates and other terms are under discussion.[23]

    [edit]Controversy and hurdle

    [edit]Hurdle

    According to Areva lack of clarity on The Civil Liability for Nuclear Damage Bill 2010 passed in Indian Parliament in August 2010 is a hurdle in finalizing deal.[24] This Civil Liability for Nuclear Damage Bill 2010 has a clause deals with the legal binding of the culpable groups in case of a nuclear accident. It allows only the operator (NPCIL) to sue the manufacturers and suppliers. Victims will not be able to sue anyone. In reality, no one will be considered legally liable because the recourse taken by the operator will yield only Indian Rupee ₹1,500 crore (US$333 million). United states of America has a law on liability-related issues for all non-military nuclear facilities constructed in the United States before 2026 named Price–Anderson Nuclear Industries Indemnity Act. This American Act establishes a no fault insurance-type system in which the first $10 billion is industry-funded as described in the Act (any claims above the $10 billion would be covered by the federal government).[25][26]

    [edit]Controversy

    Debate on nuclear power project at Jaitapur is ongoing on various levels. Environmental effects of nuclear power and geological issues have been raised by anti nuclear activists of India against this power project. Even though The Government of Maharashtra state completed land acquisition in January 2010, only 33 out of the 2,335 villagers have accepted compensation cheques as of November 2010.[27]

    [edit]Opponents

    • Earthquake prone site
    Since Jaitapur being seismically sensitive area, the danger of an accident has been foremost on the minds of people. According to theEarthquake hazard zoning of India, Jaitapur comes under Zone III. This zone is called the moderate Risk Zone and covers areas liable toMSK VIII.[28][29]
    The presence of two major creeks on the proposed site has been ignored while clearing the site.[30]
    Post the Chernobyl disaster and the Three Mile Island accident ,environmentalists, citizens of the area and the people world over are questioning about safety, as when in 2007 the largest nuclear generating station in the world Kashiwazaki-Kariwa Nuclear Power Plant inJapan at the Onagawa Nuclear Power Plant was closed for five months following an earthquake.[31][32]
    • Tsunami probability
    The probability of a tsunami, and the damage thereof, has not been taken into account while clearing the site Nevertheless probability of a tsunami on the Arabian Sea coast is very low due to the lack of seismic activity in the ocean.Moreover jaitapur is located on plateau probablity of tsunami reaching jaitapur is quite less[33][34]
    • Radiation effects
    Effects of nuclear radiation seen in Rawatbhata, India[35] has raised further questions on effects of radiation on health of people staying near nuclear power plants. The rise in deformities seen in Rawatbhata is alarming.
    It is not clear where the nuclear waste emanating from the site will be dumped. The plant is estimated to generate 300 tonnes of waste each year. EPR waste will have about four times as much radioactive BromineIodineCaesium, etc, compared to ordinary pressurized water reactor.[20]
    • Future of fisheries
    Since the plant will use the sea water for cooling and then release warm water in the Arabian Sea, fishermen in villages around are predicting destruction of fisheries in the nearby sea. Media articles also highlight the possible human and fisheries cost of this project [36]
    • Tata Institute of Social Sciences Report
    Social impact assessment review of the project are being conducted by the Jamsetji Tata centre for disaster management of the Tata Institute of Social Sciences (TISS). According to this report, the Government of India is not fully transparent with its own citizens. The government is hiding facts about huge negative impact on the social and environmental development of the Konkan region in general and the government also manipulating notification of the area from high severity earthquake zone to moderate seismic severity zone.[37][38]

    [edit]Proponents

    I know the environmentalists will not be very happy with my
    decision, but it is foolish romance to think that India can attain high
    growth rate and sustain the energy needs of a 1.2 billion population
    with the help of solar, wind, biogas and such other forms of energy.
    It is paradoxical that environmentalists are against nuclear energy.

    "
    "

    Proponents are advocating the Jaitapur Project as safe, environmentally benign and economically viable source of electrical energy to meet the increasing electricity needs of India.[39] They believe that nuclear power is a sustainable energy source that reduces carbon emissions and increasesenergy security by decreasing India's dependence on foreign oil. The promoter of Jaitapur project is Nuclear Power Corporation of India. It is a public Sector Enterprise under the administrative control of the Department of Atomic Energy (India).

    As of 2010 India is on the sixth in rank of an elite club of nations, after USA, France, Japan, the Russian Federation and the Republic of Korea, to have twenty or more nuclear power reactors in operation.[40] The company is currently operating 20 nuclear power plants at six locations in India and is implementing construction of 7 reactors at four locations.[41] In 2009/10 company has generated 18831 million units of electricity.[42]

    According to former chairman of Atomic Energy Commission Anil Kakodkar, the Jaitapur site is the best as it fulfilled the technical and scientific norms needed for a nuclear power plant.[43][44]

    Pressure vessel of the European Pressurized Reactor/Evolutionary Power Reactor

    All 20 nuclear power projects in India have been functioning very well and the waste generated at the this nuclear power plant, will be recycled. Only five per cent of it would be encapsulated and stored at technologically advanced places. It will not be buried anywhere. The waste will be stored for the next 30 to 40 years, till scientists develop some technology to treat it.[45]

    The environmental impact assessment and other associated studies of the Jaitapur project have been carried out in detail over the last few years by National Environmental Engineering Research Institute (NEERI)Nagpur in collaboration with several other reputed organizations specializing in specific environment studies.[46]

    These studies include,
    Pre-operational Baseline Radiological Survey of the Area around JNPP Site.
    Radiological Dose Apportionment.
    • Central Water and Power Research Station Pune
    Thermal Dispersion Studies for Condenser Cooling Water (CCW) Discharges
    Safe Grade Elevation Studies.
    Baseline Biodiversity Study of the area around JNPP Site.
    Marine Ecological Studies.
    Costal Regulation Zone (CRZ) Demarcation Study.
    • HTL.
    • LTL.


    Corporate social responsibility

    Nuclear Power Corporation of India has adopted a corporate social responsibility policy, by which 1.5 to 2 per cent of the net profit from Jaitapur plant would be spent in that area only. Development projects will be decided by local people and NPC will provide the funds to ensure development of these areas. [47]

    [edit]Protests

    Many protests were carried out by local people against the proposed nuclear power plant. On 29 December 2009, 12 January 2010, and 22 January 2010, when the government authorities visited Madban for distribution of cheques in lieu of compulsory land acquisition, the villagers refused to accept the cheques. Government officials were shown black flags, denied any co-operation in carrying out their activities. 72 people were arrested on 22 January 2010 when people protested against the compulsory land acquisition.[48][49][50]

    On December 4, 2010, protests became violent when over 1500 people were detained from among thousands of protesters, who included environmentalists and local villagers. Members and leaders of the Konkan Bachao Samiti (KBS) and the Janahit Seva Samiti (organizations that are spearheading opposition to the project) were also detained. In Mumbai, members of various trade unions and social organizations came together to protest against the project. The protesters have raised serious doubts about the neutrality of the Environment Impact Assessment Report, prepared by National Environmental Engineering Research Institute (NEERI) which forms the basis of environmental clearance for the project, since parallel studies by the Bombay Natural History Society have shown that the project will cause substantial environmental damage.[51]

    On April 18 one man was shot and killed by police and eight were injured as after protests against the plant turned violent.[52][53]

    [edit]Public Hearing

    A public hearing on the environmental impact asessment (EIA) Report, prepared by NEERI was conducted by Maharashtra Pollution Control Board, on behalf of Ministry of Environment and Forests on 16 April 2010, at the plant site. The public hearing became controversial as the EIA report was not delivered for study to 3 of the 4 Gram panchayat (local village bodies) a month in advance.[54]

    [edit]Events

    Major Events as of May 7, 2011
    Date Event
    November 28, 2010India, France N-regulatory bodies meet on EPR safety issues[55]
    November 28, 2010Conditional environmental clearance
    December 06, 2010Agreement signed with Areva for the construction of first set of two reactors
    March 14, 2011Legislators and Ministers repeatedly caught on camera napping through the lectures of former Atomic Energy Commission chairman Anil Kakodkar, in Maharashtra Assembly.[56]
    March 16, 2011Safety at Jaitapur not my responsibility: Jairam Ramesh[57]
    March 19, 2011India must learn from Japan's calamity and review all the planned nuclear projects in the country.: Former president of IndiaA. P. J. Abdul Kalam.[58]

    [edit]See also

    [edit]References

    Notes
    1. ^ [1]
    2. a b Deshpande, VIinaya (November 28, 2010). "It's paradoxical that environmentalists are against nuclear energy: Jairam Ramesh". Mumbai- India: The Hindu. Retrieved 29 November 2010.
    3. ^ "Jaitapur nuclear project: villagers turn down compensation". Mumbai- India: The Hindu. July 25, 2010. Retrieved 29 November 2010.
    4. ^ "Nuclear Power in India". World Nuclear Association. Updated November 2010. Retrieved 29 November 2010.
    5. ^ AMIEL, GERALDINE (DECEMBER 6, 2010). "Areva and NPCIL Sign Nuclear Agreement" (in English). PARIS: The Wall street Journal. Retrieved 6 December 2010.
    6. ^ "India, France sign nuclear power deal- Hindu" (in English). New Delhi: The Hindu. December 6, 2010. Retrieved 6 December 2010.
    7. ^ "India-France sign agreement on civil nuclear cooperation" (in English). New Delhi: NDTV. December 06, 2010. Retrieved 6 December 2010.
    8. ^ "Sarkozy eyes big contracts" (in English). The Hindu. December 02, 2010. Retrieved 2 December 2010.
    9. a b Naravane, Vaiju (November 25, 2010). ""We are partners over the long haul" Interview with Anne Lauvergeon, CEO of Areva." (in English). Paris: The Hindu. Retrieved 30 November 2010.
    10. ^ Deshpande, VIinaya (November 29, 2010). "Environmental clearance for Jaitapur nuclear project" (in English). The Hindu. Retrieved 29 November 2010.
    11. ^ Jog, Sanjay (December 6, 2010). "NPC, Areva to sign two key pacts on Jaitapur" (in English). Mumbai: BusinessStandard. Retrieved 6 December 2010.
    12. ^ A Perspective on the Nuclear Uproar in India
    13. ^ "There are other power projects coming up on a thin strip of coast of Raigad, Ratnagiri and Sindhudurg with power generation adding up to 33,000 MW." (in English). Sify News. November 29, 2010. Retrieved 30 November 2010.
    14. ^ "DNA Report on France India Nuclear Agreement". Dnaindia.com. Retrieved 2010-11-28.
    15. ^ "French Parliament ratifies indo-french nuclear deal". Dnaindia.com. 2009-11-27. Retrieved 2010-11-28.
    16. ^ "Indo-Russian Nuclear Deal on BBC". BBC News. 2008-12-05. Retrieved 2010-11-28.
    17. ^ "World Heritage sites, Tentative lists, Western Ghats sub cluster". UNESCO, MAB. 2007. Retrieved 2007-03-30.
    18. ^ "जैतापूर प्रकल्पाच्या सर्व बाजू तपासणार - रत्नागिरी आणि सिंधुदुर्ग हे जिल्हे जैवविविधतेच्या समृद्धीमुळे पर्यावरण मंत्रालयातर्फे यापूर्वीच संरक्षित म्हणून जाहीर.." (in Marathi). New Delhi: Sakal newspaper. June 10, 2010. Retrieved 2 December 2010.
    19. ^ Hebalkar, Sharad (2001) (in English). Ancient Indian ports: with special reference to Maharashtra (illustrated ed.). Munshiram Manoharlal Publishers. p. 175. ISBN 8121508584, 9788121508582. Retrieved December 3, 2010.
    20. a b c d "Reject French reactors for Jaitapur- A Gopalakrishnan (former chairman of the Atomic Energy Regulatory Board of the Government)" (in English). Indian Express. December 03,2010. Retrieved 3 December 2010.
    21. ^ "European pressurised reactors costlier, less efficient: expert"(in English). Sify.com, India News Portal. December 03, 2010. Retrieved 4 December 2010.
    22. ^ "Nicholas Sarkozy and Manmohan Singh in nuclear deal". New Delhi: BBC. December 6, 2010. Retrieved 6 December 2010.
    23. ^ Mukul, Jyoti (December 23, 2010). "Sovereign guarantee for Jaitapur Nuclear project" (in English). New Delhi: Business Standard. Retrieved 26 December 2010.
    24. ^ Roy, Shubhajit (Dec 07, 2010). "Jaitapur n-reactors flagged off but liability concerns remain" (in English). New Delhi: Indian Express. Retrieved 18 December 2010.
    25. ^ "Civil liability for nuclear damage". Eoearth.org. Retrieved 2010-12-21.
    26. ^ "US nuke team pushes for firm commitment on project sites"(in English). The Hindu BusinessLine. Jan 14, 2009. Retrieved 26 December 2010.
    27. ^ Rebello, Snehal (November 29, 2010). "Nod for Jaitapur nuclear project in time for French President's visit" (in English). Mumbai: Hindustan Times. Retrieved 30 November 2010.
    28. ^ "Vulnerability Zones in India" (in English). ReliefWeb. Retrieved 29 November 2010.
    29. ^ "Seismic Zone Map of India". Mapsofindia.com. Retrieved 2010-11-28.
    30. ^ "Jaitapur N-plant: Ministry nod ignored creeks, trusted old data"(in English). Jaitapur: Times of India. March 17, 2011. Retrieved 17 March 2011.
    31. ^ "Nuclear plant hit by earthquake closed indefinitely in Japan"(in English). KASHIWAZAKI, Japan: The New York Times. July 18, 2007. Retrieved 29 November 2010.
    32. ^ "Nuclear Power, Caught in an Earthquake, Has Japan's earthquake sent us a wakeup call?" (in English). ABC news. July 17, 2007. Retrieved 29 November 2010.
    33. ^ "Japan offers lessons, but N-power vital: Jairam" (in English). New Delhi: Business Standard. March 17, 2011. Retrieved 17 March 2011.
    34. ^ Dutt ,, Bahar (March 17, 2011). "Jaitapur project may be scrapped: Ramesh" (in English). New Delhi: CNN-IBN. Retrieved 17 March 2011.
    35. ^ "Rawatbhata Study by Dr. Surendra Gadekar". Groups.yahoo.com. Retrieved 2010-11-28.
    36. ^ "Tehelaka Report". Tehelka.com. Retrieved 2010-11-28.
    37. ^ Siddhaye, Ninad (December 26, 2010). "Jaitapur nuke plant will be a social disaster: TISS report" (in English). Mumbai: Daily News and Analysis. Retrieved 27 December 2010.
    38. ^ "Anti-Jaitapur project campaigners up ante" (in English).Special Correspondent (Mumbai: Sakaal Times). December 03, 2010. Retrieved 27 December 2010.
    39. ^ "MISSION AND OBJECTIVES of NPCIL" (in English). NPCIL. Retrieved 1 December 2010.
    40. ^ Nagaich, Nalinish (November 27, 2010). "India at Sixth Rank in the World with its 20th Nuclear Power Reactor Commencing Operation" (in English). Mumbai- India: Nuclear Power Corporation of India Limited. Retrieved 1 December 2010.
    41. ^ "about Nuclear Power Corporation of India Limited" (in English). Nuclear Power Corporation of India Limited. Retrieved 1 December 2010.
    42. ^ "Nuclear Power Generation (2006-07 to 2010-11) by NPCL" (in English). Nuclear Power Corporation of India Limited. Retrieved 1 December 2010.
    43. ^ "Jaitapur nuclear power plant no threat to environment: Kakodkar" (in English). Pune: Indian Express. December 01, 2010. Retrieved 1 December 2010.
    44. ^ (in English) Indian journal of marine sciencesVolume-23, Page- 34. Council of Scientific & Industrial Research. 1994. Retrieved December 3, 2010.
    45. ^ "Jaitapur project will not harm environment, says Kakodkar" (in English). Pune: Times of India.. December 01, 2010. Retrieved 1 December 2010.
    46. ^ "Nuclear Power Corporation of India Limited - PRESS RELEASE" (in English). Mumbai- India: Nuclear Power Corporation of India Limited. November 29, 2010. Retrieved 30 November 2010.
    47. ^ Jog, Sanjay (November 29, 2010). "Nuclear Power Corporation is committed to environment protection' Q&A: S K Jain, CMD" (in English). Mumabi: Business Standard. Retrieved 6 December 2010.
    48. ^ Balakrishnan, Bhaskar (February 10, 2009). "Unleashing India's nuclear potential" (in English). Business Daily from THE HINDU. Retrieved 2 December 2010.
    49. ^ Menon, Meena (January 18, 2010). "Nuclear power plant opposed" (in English). MADBAN (Ratnagiri district): The Hindu. Retrieved 2 December 2010.
    50. ^ "जैतापूर प्रकल्प : 'कोकण बचाव समिती'चे थेट वाद-विवादाचे आव्हान - बैठक ३ डिसेंबरला" (in Marathi). Mumbai: लोकसत्ता Loksatta. November 30, 2010. Retrieved 2 December 2010.
    51. ^ Deshpande, Vinaya (December 5, 2010). "Protest against Jaitapur nuclear plant" (in English). The Hindu. Retrieved 5 December 2010.
    52. ^ AFP: Indian police kill protester in anti-nuclear demo AFP in Google News, published 2011-04-18, accessed 2011-04-19
    53. ^ "One dead, 8 hurt as protest against Jaitapur N-plant turns violent" (in English). Jaitapur: Times of India. Apr 18 2011. Retrieved 18 April 2011.
    54. ^ July 5, 2010 (2010-07-05). "Jaitapur EIA Public Hearing". Lokayatpune.wordpress.com. Retrieved 2010-11-28.
    55. ^ "India, France N-regulatory bodies meet on EPR safety issues"(in English). Mumbai: MSN News. November 24, 2010. Retrieved 5 December 2010.
    56. ^ "Maharashtra MLAs nap as scientists discuss- lack of interest in knowing about the advantages and disadvantages of a nuclear plant risks of Japan nuclear plant" (in English). Mumbai: India Today. March 14, 2011. Retrieved 16 March 2011.
    57. ^ Eluvangal, Sreejiraj (March 16, 2011). "Safety at Jaitapur not my responsibility: Jairam Ramesh" (in English). New Delhi: DNA. Retrieved 17 March 2011.
    58. ^ "Lesson from Japan, review N-projects, says Kalam" (in English). Pune: Times of India. March 19, 2011. Retrieved 19 March 2011.
    Further reading


    [edit]External links

Singur Tata Nano controversy

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  (Redirected from Tata Nano Singur controversy)

Tata Nano Singur Controversy refers to the controversy generated by the Nano factory of Tata Motors at Singur in Hooghly districtWest BengalIndia.

Singur gained international media attention since Tata Motors started constructing a factory to manufacture their $2,500 car, the Tata Nano at Singur. The small car was scheduled to roll out of the factory by 2008.[1]

The state government of West Bengal facilitated the controversy by using an old rule to conduct an eminent domain takeover of 997 acres of farmland to have Tata build its factory.[2] The rule is meant for public improvement projects, and the West Bengal government wanted Tata to build in its state. Opponents included displaced farmers and land-rights people.

Contents

 [hide]

Small car manufacturing facility

The choice of Singur was made by the company among six sites offered by the state government. The project faced massive opposition from displaced farmers. The unwilling farmers were given political support by West Bengal's opposition leader Mamata Banerjee. Banerjee's "Save Farmland" movement was supported by celebrity environmental activists like Medha Patkar, Anuradha Talwar and Arundhati Roy. Banerjee's movement against displacement of farmers was also supported by several Kolkata based intellectuals like Aparna Sen, Kaushik Sen, Shaonli Mitra and Suvaprasanna. Ultra left activists also shared the platform with Banerjee's Trinamool Party. The Tatas finally decided to move out of Singur on 3 October 2008. Ratan Tata blamed violence by Banerjee and her supporters for the pullout decision. On 7 October 2008, the Tatas announced that they would be setting up the Tata Nano plant in Sanand, Gujarat.

Perspective of those who favour the Tata project

In the 1950s the Indian state of West Bengal was one of the most industrialized states in the country. Bidhan Roy, its first chief minister, founded large industrial plants in DurgapurAsansolKalyaniHowrah and Calcutta proper. In the 1960s and 1970s, disruptions by theBangladesh War, the Naxal movement and militant trade unionism by leftist parties led by Jyoti Basu slowed down industrial development. Consequently other states such as MaharashtraGujaratPunjabTamil Nadu and Karnataka attracted industrial investment and experienced job growth.

The rapid rise in the population of West Bengal has not been accompanied by significant economic growth. Key indicators such asunemployment rates, poverty rates, infant mortality rates, job growth rates, per capita income, mobile phone penetration rates lag the more industrialised states of India. Local politicians gained power by promising agricultural land to landless farmers, but given West Bengal's population density, the land-holdings are small and the yields are insufficient to sustain poor families. While the shift from agriculture to industrial jobs requires re-training, given India's economic growth, it provides an opportunity for earning higher income.

Several states have proposed to offer land to Tata Motors if they abandon the project in Singur.

The people staying in the proposed land was forced to evacuate by the government. The compensation given was inadequate and the new housing facilities offered were delayed. This led to the protest of the peasants backed by the political parties of opposition, who thought it would be a good opportunity to end the communist rule of Bengal.

The company has made substantial promises. According to their claims, Singur would become a mini-auto city and approximately 70 vendors would set up shop along with the factory. The total investment planned is to the tune of Rs 1,000 crore.[3] The project had, however, generated controversy right from the start, particularly on the question of state acquisition of fertile agricultural land for private enterprises.

The land acquisition controversy

On 23 September 2008, Tatas decided to leave Singur in West Bengal, the decision is reported to have been made by the Tata management and the Bengal government had been informed. On 3 October it became official that TATA will leave Singur (WB) when Ratan Tata announced it in a press conference in Kolkata.

While the ruling party has gone all out[4] for acquisition of 997 acres (404 ha)[2] of multi-crop land required for the car factory, questions have been raised about the party forcible acquisition which was made under the colonial Land Acquisition Act of 1894.[2] Others say the provisions of this act were allegedly not been met.[5]

The law has provisions for state taking over privately held land for public purposes but not for developing private businesses. The illegality of the acquisition has been substantially conceded by the Kolkata High Court.

The Tata Motors site is the most fertile one in the whole of the Singur, and the Singur block, in turn, is among the most highly fertile in West Bengal. Consequently, almost the entire local population depends on agriculture with approximately 15000 making their livelihood directly from it.[6] With the number of direct jobs to be created no more than about 1,000, many of which are expected to go to outsiders, the local populace feel understandably threatened for their livelihood.[7] Environmental degradation is also feared.

Chief protesters include the opposition parties spearheaded by the Trinamool Congress under Mamata Banerjee and Socialist Unity Centre of India. The movement has received widespread support from civil rights and human rights groups, legal bodies, social activists like Medha Patkar and Anuradha TalwarBooker prize-winning author Arundhati Roy and Magsaysay and Jnanpith Award-winning author Mahasweta Devi.[8] Other intellectuals, writers like the poet Joy Goswami, artists like Suvaprasanna, theatre and film personalities like Saonli Mitra,Aparna Sen etc. have pitched in. The state police force has been used to restrict their access to the area.[9] The Nobel Laureate Amartya Sen has on the other hand appeared to defend the decision to set up the factory. He however opposed forcible acquisition of land.[3]

The protesters have been trenchantly attacked, verbally by the Communist Party of India (Marxist) (CPI(M)) leaders and physically by the party's supporters. Benoy Konar, member of the party's state committee, famously declared that protesting intellectuals would be greeted by women supporters of the party by baring their behinds [4].

Preliminary surveys by officials of the state and Tata Motors faced protests, and manhandling on one occasion, from the villagers organized under the Save Singur Farmland Committee with Trinamool Congress forming its chief component.[10] It is reported that Naxalite elements hold sway over the direction the agitation takes and the Trinamool Congress chief Mamata Banerjee takes no decisions without consulting them.[11]

The state government imposed the prohibitory Section 144 of the Indian Penal Code for initially a month and then extended it indefinitely. The imposition has been declared illegal by the Kolkata High Court [12]

While landless peasants and share-croppers fear losing out entirely, sections of the locals, particularly those owing allegiance to the CPI(M) have welcomed the factory. These count chiefly among the owners of bigger portions of the land even as discrimination in the compensation has been alleged.[13]

A section of those promised jobs at the factory have boycotted classes while training in protest against the alleged going back on the promise.[14]

Fencing off the land

The land earmarked for the project was taken control of by the state administration amidst protests and fencing off commenced on December 1, 2006. Mamata Banerjee, who was prevented from entering Singur by the state police, called a statewide bandh in protest while legislators belonging to her party turned violent in the legislative assembly causing damage to furniture. [5] Later, she went on a 25-day hunger strike[6].During this period she presented affidavits of farmers apparently unwilling to part with their land.[15]

The fenced off area has been regularly guarded, besides large contingents of policemen, by cadres of the CPI(M) party. They were accused of the multiple rape followed by burning to death of teenage villager Tapasi Malik who was active in the protests, on December 18, 2006.[16]Negligence and political interference in the probe into her death have been alleged.[17] Later, CPI(M) activist Debu Malik and based on his statement, CPI(M) zonal committee secretary Suhrid Dutta were arrested by the Central Bureau of Investigation in connection with the crime.[18]

Intermittent attacks by villagers have since continued on the fence. However, continuing agitations against the project appeared to have proved ineffective and a farmer who lost land committed suicide[19]

On the other hand the pro-factory villagers siding with the CPI(M) have made accusations against the Naxalite faction of the 'Save Singur Farmland Committee' of threats and violence against them.[20]

Construction of plant

Tatas ceremonially initiated the construction of the plant on 21 January 2007.[21] The Tata Group announced on October 3, 2008 that they are pulling out of Singur due to the political unrest and agitation by the Trinamool Congress against the construction of the plant.

Procedural lacunae

Other aspects of the process of setting up the factory that have come under severe criticism are the government's secrecy on the details of the deal and the chief minister's furnishing of false information, including in the legislative assembly Vidhan Sabha. In particular, the concessions being given to Tata Motors have not been publicly revealed. The falsehoods of the chief minister chiefly pertain to claims made by him of having acquired 912 acres (3.69 km2[22] through voluntary consent of the owners without the use of force.

The Kolkata High Court declared the acquisition prima facie legal.[23] The air seemed to have cleared somewhat when the High Court ordered the state government to submit correct figures following which an affidavit but was not satisfied with the result [7]. In a fresh affidavit filed later in June 2007, the government admitted to 30 per cent of the land was acquired from farmers without consent.[24] The affidavit remains unclear on whether the lack of consent is based on insufficiency of the compensation or refusal to sell altogether.[25]

Business houses' role

The critics of the government's industrialization policy have argued on the other hand that while India is moving towards a "free market" economy, government has been acting as a broker for the private sector by forcing private citizens to give up their property at throw away prices.[who?]

Tata pulls out

On October 3, 2008, after a brief meeting with the Chief Minister, Mr. Ratan Tata declared his decision to move the Nano Project out of West Bengal. Mr. Tata specifically mentioned his frustration with the opposition movement at Singur Project led by Trinamool Congress chief Ms. Mamata Banerjee. Ms Banerjee responded by referring to actions by Tatas and the state government.[26][27]

The CM of GujaratNarendra Modi then sent an SMS to Mr. Ratan Tata, which simply said "Suswagatham", to persuade him to relocate the Nano factory to Gujarat.[28]

It took 14 months to build a new factory in Sanand, Gujarat compared with 28 months for the Singur factory.[29]

References

  1. ^ The Hindu Business Line, 26 November 2006
  2. a b c The Economist August 30, 2008 edition. U.S. Edition. "Nano wars". Page 63.
  3. ^ The Hindu Business Line, 13 December 2006
  4. ^ The Telegraph 14 October 2006
  5. ^ The Business Standard
  6. ^ Countercurrents.org, 30 December 2006 Headline Singur
  7. ^ Tehelka Mar 03, 2007
  8. ^ doccentre.net Report on Public Hearing
  9. ^ The Times of India December 8, 2007: Do you need a visa to enter Bengal?
  10. ^ The Indian Express 15 January 2007
  11. ^ Banerjee doesn't take decisions without Naxal elements' OK:The Indian Express August 31
  12. ^ The Times of India February 15, 2007
  13. ^ The Telegraph December 10, 2006
  14. ^ The Telegraph 23 June, 2007 Job cry from Tata trainees
  15. ^ The Statesman 23 December 2006
  16. ^ The Statesman 19 December 2007
  17. ^ The Statesman 22 January 2007
  18. ^ The Indian Express 29 June 2007 CPM local boss arrested for Singur girl's murder
  19. ^ The Indian Express 26 May 2007
  20. ^ DNA - India - 'Save Singur' turns sour - Daily News & Analysis
  21. ^ The Telegraph 22 January 2007
  22. ^ The Indian Express November 24, 2006
  23. ^ The India Daily February 24 2007 Calcutta High Court says Singur land acquisition appears illegal -all eyes now on communists in West Bengal
  24. ^ IBN 10 June 2007: 30 pc Singur farmers not compensated
  25. ^ The Times of India 8 June 2007: State files Singur affidavit
  26. ^ "Tata pulls out of Singur, blames Trinamool stir - The Financial Express". www.financialexpress.com. Retrieved 2009-03-10.
  27. ^ "If Tata pulls out, Trinamool will be solely responsible: CM". Chennai, India: www.hindu.com. 28 September 2008. Retrieved 2009-03-10.
  28. ^ [1]
  29. ^ [2]


  People's Democracy

(Weekly Organ of the Communist Party of India (Marxist)


Vol. XXX

No. 05

January 29, 2006

The Agrarian Crisis And Importance Of Peasant Resistance

 

Utsa Patnaik

THE principal contradiction in the colonial period, was between the Indian people as a whole, and imperialism and its local comprador allies. After Independence, the principal contradiction changed to the contradiction between the mass of the working peasantry and labourers on the one hand, and the minority of landlords, traders and moneylenders who monopolized control over land and money-capital, thereby exploiting the peasantry through rent, interest and exorbitant traders' margins. While imperialism was by no means dead, it was on the retreat in the context of the post-War shambles that was the advanced world, and decolonisation allowed space for third world countries like India to try to de-link from the earlier international division of labour under which they had been completely open and liberalised economies geared to metropolitan growth, not national growth. They could now protect their economies and undertake state intervention in the interests of national development - in which they were helped by the existence and aid of the socialist camp. The old liberalisers were silenced, while the new liberalisers had not yet appeared.

 

In the agrarian sphere in India the resolution of the principal contradiction was tied up closely with the solution of a number of other important secondary economic and social contradictions. The principal contradiction implied the need to break land monopoly by measures of effectively re-distributing land from the landlords to the land-poor and landless, to break the monopoly of credit and marketing through co-operative institutions of the peasants themselves, and state intervention in channelling credit to the credit-starved and setting up non-profit marketing institutions between producer and consumer with the aim of stabilising prices for both. It was essential that the principal contradiction should be tackled boldly in order to resolve the many other important and related contradictions.

 

There was the contradiction between the continuing caste, class, gender and other social types of oppression in a particularly intense form in rural areas on the one hand, and the very constitutional basis of the Indian polity which considered every citizen to be equal and to have equal opportunities regardless of caste, class, gender and so on. The non-left political forces, economists and planners in India however have consistently underestimated the role of effective re-distributive land reforms for breaking the economic and social power of the rural landed minority for laying the precondition for measures of mass poverty reduction and providing an expanding market for industry, and for reducing the old class, caste and gender based forms of inequalities which express themselves in high levels of illiteracy, declining sex-ratios, atrocities against dalits, and the persistence of child labour. Only in the states where the Left movement has been influential were effective measures of land reform undertaken, with a very positive impact despite their relatively limited nature.

 

While the achievements of forty years of planned development in India were in many ways substantial, its economic and social failures therefore have been equally glaring. These lay in the inability to substantially reduce mass poverty, which is particularly concentrated in rural areas; an insufficient growth of the internal mass market and hence the emergence of pressure to seek external sources of growth in collaboration with foreign capital.

 

RE-EMERGENCE OF FINANCE CAPITAL

 

International developments led to the re-emergence of finance capital as a dominating force over industrial capital in the advanced world from the late nineteen seventies. The relative political unity achieved by the national bases of this finance capital (by subordinating inter-imperialist rivalry, to common aims vis a vis the third world), the aggressive use by finance capital, of the supra-national Bretton Woods institutions (the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank) for implementing its aims, and the collapse of the Soviet Union, have together led to a highly favourable conjuncture for imperialism, which is once again aggressively trying to re-colonise the third world and has substantially succeeded in many smaller countries. In recent years however tendencies of resistance to the dominance of finance capital have also started emerging in varied ways.

 

The new liberalisers arrived on the scene in Latin America and Africa many years ago; they have been stridently pushing the theories and practice of the new liberalisation in India since the beginning of the nineties. The old imperialism was transparent because there was direct political control, while the new imperialism is less transparent and therefore in many ways, more dangerous. The new liberalisation differs from the old colonial liberalisation in at least two respects : it has a strategy of improving further the economic position of the third-world rich at the expense of their fellow-citizens, which has materially corrupted the elite of our country; and it has an ideological thrust in terms of wrong theories, which has intellectually suborned the same third world public figures and intellectuals who were earlier supporters of independent growth, but who now mindlessly parrot the mantra of liberalisation they have memorised from their advanced country mentors. The new compradors are following anti-national theories and policies no less than the old compradors had done. It is extremely important for those who are within the Left movement to fight the revisionist tendencies creeping into the movement which lead to a 'soft' stance on liberalisation. To support any aspect of liberalisation even for pragmatic reasons is equivalent to political liquidationism.

 

AGRARIAN CRISIS IN INDIA

 

India has been following since 1991 exactly the same set of deflationary policies at the macroeconomic level, already followed in the 1980s by nearly 80 indebted countries under the guidance of the IMF. These included reduction in Central and state government development expenditures, tight money, reduction of the ratio of budget deficit to GDP, caps on organised sector wages, and devaluation.

 

The useful papers in the two volume study edited by Cornia, Jolly and Stewart, titled Adjustment with a Human Face (1987), have detailed the effects of the neo-liberal policy package in those developing countries which undertook these policies a decade or earlier compared to India. The picture which emerged was alarming indeed: reduction in investment rates, reduction in growth rates, and absolute decline in output and income in a number of cases, a reversal of progress on the fronts of literacy, infant mortality rates and other health indicators, sharp cuts in wages and employment, and rise in poverty. All this was exactly as sensible macroeconomic theory would predict: if deflationary and contractionary policies are consistently followed, the results are bound to be as observed, and only those people can ever think otherwise, who adhere to a logically incorrect theory serving the narrow interests of finance capital.

 

The fact that neo-liberal policies represent an attack on the forces of production in developing countries is still neither understood nor believed by most people despite the overwhelming theoretical and empirical evidence which has emerged in favour of this conclusion during the last quarter century. Many persons are misled by the assertion that India has the second highest GDP growth rate in the world after China, namely 7 to 8 per cent annually, into thinking that the growth is taking place in every sector. On the contrary, from the mid-1990s in particular, both the material productive sectors – industry and agriculture – have been in decline with agriculture being more severely affected than industry. The only sector which has expanded fast is the services sector. There has been a perverse structural shift in the economy even before any substantial industrial growth has taken place.

 

The share of agriculture and related activities in GDP has fallen steeply from one-third of GDP before reforms to only 24 percent at present. The share of industry has stagnated around a quarter while that of services has risen fast to one half of GDP. Deflationary policies have thus impacted severely on the material productive sectors of the economy. Both agriculture and industry have seen decelerating rates of output growth and therefore rising unemployment. Further, the reform period has seen a reduction of labour's bargaining power through the casualisation of the work force including in public sector undertakings.

 

During the 7th Plan period marking the pre-reforms phase, from 1985 to 1990, Rs 51,000 crore was spent on rural development, amounting to almost 4 per cent of Net National Product, and Rs 91,000 crore or over 7 per cent of NNP was spent on infrastructure. In rural development we include the plan expenditure heads of agriculture, rural development, special areas programmes, irrigation and flood control, and village and small scale industry. By 2000-01 the share of spending under these heads taken together was down to 5.8 per cent of NNP, the rural development part halving to only 1.9 per cent. The per capita expenditures in real terms declined from Rs 151 in 1989-90 to Rs 124 in 2000-01. This harsh contractionary policy had nothing to do with any objective resource constraint but simply reflected the preferred policy package of the BWI which were internalised and sought to be justified by the Indian government.

 

There is no economic rationale for believing that "public investment crowds out private investment" which is the common argument put forward for reducing the state's role in rural development. Precisely the contrary has been shown to hold for an economy like India, such as public investment in irrigation projects of all types and crop varieties research. The result of the unwise cut-back of public investment and in rural development expenditure (RDE) has been a drastic slowing of output growth – both foodgrains and non-foodgrains growth rates have halved in the nineties compared to the eighties, and have fallen well below the population growth rate. Hence the nineties have seen falling per head output, for the first time since the mid-sixties agricultural crisis, which however was short- lived, whereas per head output


Land Acquisition, Resettlement and Rehabilitation
Land Acquisition, Resettlement and Rehabilitation
Issues and Problems
Numerous activities undertaken by human beings, on day to day basis, causes severe damages to the environment as a whole, particularly to the country's land resource base. These activities include construction of residential and office buildings, construction of physical infrastructure like roads, highways, bridges, etc. and creation of social infrastructures like schools, hospitals, etc. Although these activities are of utmost importance for the sound growth of any economy, but all these necessitates cutting of trees (deforestation) for space, destruction of water bodies, etc. which in turn causes soil erosion and land degradation. Thus, it is right to say that in the wake of globalisation and urbanisation, people are misusing available land resources by not fully utilising them and as a result, causing scarcity of productive land.

Secondly, due to lack of proper implementation of Acts and Rules relating to land acquisition as well as difficulty in approaching the concerned Department / Ministry/ Organisation at the right time, it becomes difficult to acquire required land. Further, given the population density and the type of land use in the country, there is more problem in land acquisition in India. Thus, it is a big challenge for Government, both Central and State, to generate greater access of land to the people at large, including landless rural poor and foreign investors/ non-resident Indians.

For setting up huge industrial projects, dams, factories, refineries, etc., more and more land is being used. As a result, the people/ community residing there face many problems. They are forced to leave their resident place and move to other places. First, there is problem in searching proper place to live in. Secondly, land acquisition for industrialization and related projects highlight the issues of adequate compensation that need to be given to the displaced people for protecting their living standards. This is one of the common problem in land acquisition and resettlement.

Further, there is need to rehabilitate the lost productivity of available lands so that they can be effectively put in use for various purposes like agricultural, industrial, residential, office buildings, etc. as land is scarce resource. The Government is also running its various policies and schemes for this purpose. Also, efforts are being made not only to restore fertility of the land or to provide shelter to displaced people, but also to create conditions so as to bring in focus the land resources which are not yet tapped and utilised.

Hence, there are many such and other related issues and problems relating to land acquisition, resettlement and rehabilitation in India, both in rural and urban areas. They need to be dealt with great care for future availability and use of land/ properties.

^ Top

Ministry of Urban Development
Department of Land Resources
http://business.gov.in/land/issues_problems.php

Shibdas Ghosh

Agrarian Problems and Peasant Movement in India


Source: Socialist Unity Centre of India (SUCI) (used with kind permission)
Date : March 29, 1970
First published : November, 1970
HTML Markup : Salil Sen for marxists.org October, 2007
Public Domain : Marxists Internet Archive (2007). You may freely copy, distribute, display and perform this work; as well as make derivative and commercial works. Please credit "Marxists Internet Archive" as your source.


Analysing the root cause of agrarian problems and those facing the poor peasants and agricultural labourers, Comrade Ghosh elaborately discussed in this address to the delegates of the Twelfth West Bengal State Conference of the All India Krishak O Khetmazur Sangathan, how in a backward country like India, capitalism, and capitalist land relation stand in the way of modernizing and mechanizing agriculture and creating alternative employment opportunities without which agrarian problems cannot be solved and rural uplift achieved. At the same time he brought home that land reforms by themselves — projected as the panacea to all the ills of peasants' life by the self-styled Marxist parties in this country — cannot bring to an end the problems and abject misery of peasants, and how the question of alleviating their plight, of solving the burning problems of their lives is inextricably linked up with the task of anti-capitalist socialist revolution. He charted the way for building the truly revolutionary peasant movement to achieve the goal of emancipation.


Comrades,

You requested me to address this concluding session of the three-day long Delegates Conference of the Krishak O Khetmajur Federation[1]  . You are assembled here as delegates from different villages, different police station areas, different parts of this district of Birbhum[2]  and other various districts of West Bengal. Many of you, those present here, are aware that more than seventyfive out of one hundred of India's population live in the villages. These millions of common people in rural areas have a thousand and one problems in life. But the issue I need to point out to you in the first place is that the problem of getting jobs for the whole year for every able peasant is the one which comes foremost among all the problems of rural life today. Providing jobs for the rural poor throughout the year, it may be farming the land or any other type, so that as wage of their work their minimum income is such that they can live a healthy social life, which means, in plain terms, they could make both ends meet all through the year, feeding their children, getting them medicine at times of illness, at least giving them a minimum of education which ought to be given to all — just this stands out today as the main problem facing the rural life.

You should know, recovery of benam[3]   lands grabbed by jotedars[4]  , making fallow lands cultivable, and distributing lands vested in the government among agricultural labourers, landless and poor peasants on the principle of equitable distribution — all this is vital no doubt, but is not the main problem. Because, considering the minimum amount of land that needs to be allotted to a family for its sustenance and meeting the other necessary expenses throughout the year, there is dearth of that quantum of land needed for distribution among the whole population in the villages today in India. This means, the character of today's rural problem is not such that by simply carrying out the task of distributing land to the rural masses we can put an end to the destitution of agricultural labourers, landless and poor peasants in the villages. You have to particularly bear this in mind with respect to peasant movements.

Distribution of recovered benam lands, vested lands and fallow lands made cultivable among peasants is an important task of peasant movement

It does not mean however that by saying this I am disregarding the need or am trying to underplay the importance of effecting the one task of peasant movement which calls for recovering and distributing among agricultural labourers, landless and poor peasants all benam lands above ceiling limits which are illegally kept under occupation by big jotedars or former zemindars<[5]  , or allotting those lands which are vested in government but have been appropriated by others, depriving agricultural labourers, landless and poor peasants through deceit in connivance with government officials. I maintain, on the contrary, that recovering vested and benam lands, making fallow lands arable, and distributing all these lands among agricultural labourers, landless and poor peasants are indeed an important task of your peasant movement. All I need to emphasize is that even if you did allot all recovered vested and benam lands and all the fallow lands made arable to agricultural labourers, poor and landless peasants, you just could not give to most of them that minimum of land with which they can just make ends meet for a peasant family. It is because, as we had calculated it at an all-India conference some twenty years ago, the minimum land with which a peasant family could make both ends meet, or what is called an economic holding, works out to be 12 bighas[6]   — by now the figure must come up to 15 bighas, considering the ever increasing price-level till now. But even this I am leaving aside. Say, all benam lands of the country are recovered, all fallow lands made cultivable, and these along with all the vested lands are distributed equally. Even so, considering all available lands and the total population engaged in rural economy, that is, the total population of agricultural labourers, landless and poor peasants taken into account, it is hardly possible to allot even 7 to 9 bighas of land to each of the families of even half of this population of India — although in my estimation this size of land does not make the holding economic today. In any case, it means, the other half of people will not be recipient of any land at all. As a result, even after allotting all these lands, so many in the villages will have been left unemployed, or will be going without job the year round. Neither could you give them land, nor are they getting jobs. What happens then ? If they do not get any job in the village, they have to leave home and hearth and move to the town anyway. Many village people are thus crowding towns in search of jobs as wage-labourers. There too they are turning destitutes. Some may be working as porters, who could anyhow make it. Or, some such means they take to and live on streetsides in subhuman existence. After some time, many go back to their village home and swell the ranks of the rural unemployed and semi-employed. Thus, distributing land cannot in itself save the peasant.

Problem of peasants cannot be solved only through distribution of recovered benam and vested lands and fallow lands turned arable

Examining the issue from another angle will also help you grasp that even by distributing the requisite land among peasants the problems of the agricultural labourers, landless and poor peasants cannot be solved. In the first place, because, as I did point it out earlier, carrying out the task of land distribution will not make land available to all agricultural labourers, landless and poor peasants. Secondly, those getting land cannot hold on to it. Because, as you know, members in each family and in society keep on increasing in numbers but land does not grow in size. Land remains as it is. There is a finite limit to available land, like there is a limit to enhancing land's productivity. Whereas, the number of members in each family keeps on increasing. Say, you are a peasant and you have got nine bighas of land. You thought, you could manage your household with this. Then, say, five children are born to you. Or, if you went by government's prescribed norm, you had then, say, three children. Now divide your land among the three. If one or two of the issues are female, even then your land will have to be divided equally among the three. Just because, in India at present sons and daughters have equal right to parental property. It may be that women in many families, weighed down by age-old convention as they are, do not assert their claim. But when awareness dawns on them, women will claim their due shares. Anyway, nine bighas divided equally among three leave three bighas to each as share. Afterwards, if these three get married and each has three issues then the share of each will be one bigha of land. To a family it hardly makes a difference whether it owns or does not own a bigha of land.

Secondly, in the case of a poor peasant having land of the measure of a bigha is of little use. Even if a land of three bighas is allotted to every family, it will not turn out to be really effective. Because, even if a poor peasant is allotted that amount of land, he will be forced to sell it out the next year. He cannot retain it simply because he cannot manage his household with a land of three bighas. As a result, the land will get sold up to buyers who have the money for it. Indeed this way most of the poor and lower-middle peasants have been dispossessed of their lands. Just think how the lands which these poor and lower-middle peasants had in possession till twenty years back went out of their hands. The elderly among you are aware that during the famine of fifty[7]   in Bengal poor and lower-middle peasants had to sell out many lands. At that time, jotedars and moneylenders took advantage of the extreme privation of the poverty-stricken peasants to cheat them, grabbing their lands virtually at no price. Again, as the peasants were incapable of repaying the loans they had taken by mortgaging their lands at times of dire want, or when under duress, times of illness, or to meet expenses at times of family ceremonies, they could not recover their lands and were thus dispossessed of all the many lands of theirs. Therefore, even if the peasants received two or, say, three bighas of land, could that solve the problems of their lives ? Could that either nullify the grounds for which peasants and agricultural labourers are waging struggles ? Can a landless peasant hold on to two or three bighas of land he might be allotted ? If the able sons in the family have no alternative employment and the peasant cannot add more land to his possession of land with savings from his sons' earnings and maintain the farming adequately, he will be forced again to mortgage his land at times of want, illness, ceremonies, or to sell it out and become the landless peasant he was before. This is an inevitable destiny in the capitalist rural economy in a backward country like ours, and it is thus that the ranks of agricultural labourers and landless peasants are swelling by the day at growing rates.

Whereas, many in this country believe that the problem could be resolved by enacting a law to bar sale of land by poor peasants. What they fail to realize is that, let alone bring benefit to the poor peasant, such legal bars to the sale of land in the capitalist system will hamper the agricultural production itself. Because a land of two or three bighas does not make an economic holding for a family, that is, a holding not adequate as a means for subsistence, the peasant cannot farm this land the way it should be. It may be that at times he will be even circumscribed to leave the land uncultivated. In that event, as a consequence, a food crisis will break out in the country, agricultural production will get hampered, and its retrograde effect will have repercussions on the entire national economy. For the sake of economy itself in the present capitalist set-up, legal bar to sale and purchase of land is not viable therefore. Although, it has been suggested by many that following the example of socialist countries purchase of land by individual owners be barred in the present circumstance and the state instead buy these lands. But what will the state do after buying these lands ? The government has to undertake state farming in that event to cultivate these lands. Today it is not possible that the government in a backward capitalist country like ours will buy all these lands and set up large-scale state farms to cultivate these lands as there is no way then to provide alternative employment to the millions of peasants who will be thrown unemployed if mechanization is introduced in agriculture in this country at the state's initiative.

The urban areas are already teeming with the army of the unemployed and semi-employed, their numbers soaring up at increasing rates. Therefore, any attempts to mechanize agriculture in the present condition, that is, to modernize agriculture with tractor-machines will throw millions in the villages out of employment at a single stroke. The urban unemployed in hundreds of thousands added to the surplus millions in agriculture thus thrown unemployed will create a situation under whose weight this capitalist system will be on the verge of collapse. With the unemployment problem already acute and ever more aggravating, capitalism cannot undertake this task for the sake of its own survival. If modern tractor-machines are introduced in the land to which thousands of agricultural labourers, sharecroppers and poor peasants in the village remain somehow attached — maybe like half-dead souls subsisting somehow on this land — they will all become surplus labour. In a country where unemployment is constantly proliferating even before introduction of tractor-machines has begun in land farming, and these peasants cannot be given employment in mills and factories, where the situation is such that even those employed in the industries are getting retrenched or laid off and so many factories are closing down, people from villages are flocking into towns because they have no employment scope in the countryside, capitalism can by no means somehow maintain its existence if attempts are made for modernization of agriculture with tractor-machines. This is why, in their bid to extend the lease of life of this moribund, reactionary capitalist system as long as they can, the ruling bourgeoisie are administering a host of palliatives like Green Revolution, Japanese way of cultivation, Tai-Chung, IR-8, and so forth. So many diverse attempts are going on with purport to work magic with how many different crops could be grown and how much more could be harvested in piecemeal lands by various plannings. And every year crores[8]   of rupees are being spent for all this. However, they cannot pluck the courage to come up with plans for big land farming or state farming with tractor-machines. Therefore, with the capitalist economic order and capitalist state machine remaining in place, this road cannot lead to the solution of the problem. From this angle too it can be seen that the question of completing the task of the half-baked agrarian revolution in our country is indispensably interwoven with the task of accomplishing anti-capitalist socialist revolution.

From this discussion you could then see that simply by distributing land the sufferings in the rural life cannot be ended and the peasant cannot survive unless provisions of employment could be made for each able individual of the poor peasant families in the villages. To provide employment is the basic issue confronting the rural life today, whether by allotment of enough lands, or by other means. Had there been provision of job all through the year for every individual in the village to earn sufficient wages, their privation would not have reached the present dimension in that event. In my consideration, the minimum wage prescribed by the present bourgeois government of India for industrial workers in some sectors has not been fixed on the principle of social justice. Had it been so, the prescribed wage would have been much higher on account of today's ever rising price-level. Let us leave aside even this. If every able individual in a family, which does not own, say, two bighas of land, could be given employment round the year carrying a salary of rupees two hundred and fifty to three hundred, his distress would not have been so much acute. On the other hand, a family owning even ten to twelve bighas of land but having eight to ten members, who have no alternative employment, cannot arrange for two square meals all through the year, let alone meet expenses for medical treatment, or for education. It does not mean however, and I emphasized it earlier too, that you have no need to build movements to recover and distribute all those lands which are either held in benam, or are vested lands not allotted properly, or are lands lying fallow and not made cultivable. Nor do I mean to underplay its importance in the present phase of peasant movement. These movements are necessary to build up as it will mitigate to a certain extent the sorrows and sufferings and the rural people's purchasing capacity will also improve, even if by a whit. But my point is that this will not solve the basic problem.

Basic issue of rural life today is round-the-year employment provision for every able individual by opening the road to unhindered industrialization

So, no doubt, distribution of recovered benam lands, equitable redistribution of vested lands and proper allotment of arable lands previously fallow is an important issue of peasant movement but is not its central and pivotal issue. The pivotal issue of peasant movement in today's context is to develop the rural economy through mechanization and modernization of agriculture and to open up side by side the road to industrialization in order to provide employment to the surplus population in the villages and the rural unemployed and semi-employed. That is, to provide employment to all those of the village people who could not be allotted land in the course of distribution of the requisite minimum lands to agricultural labourers, landless and poor peasants in pursuit of a programme of just and proper allotment of recovered benam lands, fallow lands made cultivable and equitable redistribution of vested lands. Now the question is, how to provide employment to every able individual in the village ? Who will provide ? The only way to create such kind of employment is to open the road to continuous industrialization. If factories and mills could be set up and development of industries could go on unhindered, if, in other words, the road to full-scale industrialization could be opened up, then attempts could alongside go on also in agricultural economy for modernization and mechanization. Ancillary and auxiliary industries in agricultural economy could start developing in the rural areas making possible rapid growth of agricultural production. In that event, in the industries that would come up in order to cater to the very need of modernization and scientific development of agriculture, a section of all those could be absorbed who will have been left over landless following allotment of requisite minimum lands to other peasants. After this, those still left over unemployed could be absorbed if industrial development could be carried on in the neighbouring urban areas. With the situation so developed, no able individuals in any of the families would be left unemployed, everybody would be absorbed. In that event, whatever land a family might have, they will cultivate it and whatever necessities cannot be fulfilled through that cultivation, for that those in the family not engaging in cultivation will take on other employments. Thus, with the earnings of all, agriculture will develop, its mechanization and modernization can be made possible, agricultural production will grow, the look of the village will radically change. Electricity will come to the villages, roads will be built, schools, parks and hospitals will be set up, there will be provisions for sports and games, cultural functions will be held. If all these can be realized, then the present condition of the villages — these haunts of ghosts, as others call it, where snakes and frogs inhabit, and with them you also inhabit — this condition will change altogether. Then the villages will become fit for human habitation. The incomparable gap between rural and urban life will diminish. So, you see, for the uplift of villages in order that they become fit for human habitation and to bring about mechanization and modernization of agriculture, you have to solve the problem of the country's industrial development and provision of employment to all able people. You should bear in mind that the solution to this problem is inextricably linked with the resolution of the crisis that stems inexorably from the Indian capitalist state and capitalist economy. Unless you could establish the socialist state and the socialist economic system by doing away with the present capitalist state and capitalist economy, you cannot open the road to unhindered industrial development in the country simply by effecting the programme of distribution of land at present. And unless you can carry this out, no provision can be made for employment to all able people in the villages, their poverty and sufferings cannot be removed, uplift of the present condition of the villages cannot be made possible.

Capitalist economic order stands today as main hurdle on road to unhindered industrialization of the country

Because India's production system runs on capitalist production relations, that is, production takes place here, whether in agriculture or in industry, under control of private ownership with the motive of earning maximum profit, there is no growth in industrial production, though the problem is not so acute in agriculture. Private owners determine the prices of all industrial products of mills and factories on the basis of maximum profit and, you know, the owners sell these products in the market only when there are people who have the purchasing power for buying these. But by far the majority of people in the country do not have the capacity to buy the goods at these prices. Because, in the first place, of the seventyfive to eighty per cent of the total population of our country who are attached to land in the rural areas, fiftyone to fiftyfive per cent, on an all-India count, are landless peasants and agricultural labourers. This is a highly conservative estimate though. The figure is much higher in reality. Of them, the majority are unemployed and semi-employed, people who do not have employment round the year. Moreover, the number of poor peasants, that is, those who own land from two or three bighas to six or seven bighas, is fifteen per cent. Besides, the lower-middle peasants, who own six or seven to fifteen bighas of land, also number around fifteen per cent. It means, these eightyfive per cent of rural population are proletariat to semi-proletariat — people who have no employment all through the year. They cannot arrange for two full meals a day. These eightyfive per cent of the rural population have almost zero purchasing power, or so we may say. To get some clothings, the barest to wear, a few rags for the women, and two bare meals — for this little just they are burning out. How could they afford to buy the industrial commodities they need so badly ? Where is their purchasing power ?

Secondly, in the present economic system, taking into account the increased price-levels of all articles of necessity, the real wages of all who work in mills and factories in urban areas and get pay at the end of the month have gone down much compared to what they earned previously. In terms of figures, of course, that is, in terms of money, their wages have gone up comparatively. But considering the case in terms of comparative price-levels, one could not deny, unless one had his eyes and ears shut or had some ulterior motive and vested interest, that the real wages have come down a lot. Comparing how one did manage things earlier with an earning of a rupee a day, say, does he feel better off now though his wage has gone up today ? No, he doesn't. This is because, in our country the minimum wage a labourer is to be paid is not calculated by taking into account the prices of all articles of necessity to live a life as befits man. In this country, the minimum wage to be paid is fixed at a level at which the labourer could have bare sustenance and gasp on to turn the wheels of the owner's machine, he could seek out a shelter in a stenchy slum where one might easily contract tuberculosis, managing there to live with a woman, and for that matter his wife. The minimum of pay with which a labourer could manage to meet the barest of necessity is reckoned as his wage, whereas the minimum wage should have been determined in consonance with prices of essential commodities in order that even a very ordinary family could meet the expenses of living a healthy life, whereupon a nation could be built up. But in no capitalist country is this norm followed to fix the wage of a labourer. The situation is even worse in our country. As a result, the majority of people working in mills and factories of our country do not own the capacity to buy necessary industrial commodities. Besides, the millions of educated and semi-educated unemployed people crowding the urban areas, whose numbers are swelling at galloping rates, do not have any purchasing capacity at all. In this situation, naturally, because the majority lack the purchasing capacity and whatever little capacity they have is continuously on the decline, the market is squeezed in very much for the industrial owners, each day this market gets squeezed in further. On the other, no vast market abroad remains now to which the industrialists could export their products for sale. Because, in the first place, following the emergence of the world socialist system and the world socialist market after the second World War parallel to the world capitalist system, the old traditional world capitalist market has become squeezed in drastically. Moreover, the newly independent Afro-Asian countries like India, for instance, whom the imperialists used to exploit by establishing their absolute rule over them — with the emergence of these countries as new competitors in the world capitalist market after they had restructured their economies, breaking free from the imperialist chain and colonial slavery following the second World War, the already squeezed-in world capitalist market has suffered further squeezes, this in turn having led to further aggravation of the crisis of the world capitalist market.

Thirdly, keep in mind, the character and nature of the crisis into which the world capitalist market plunged at the end of the second World War is different in essence from all its previous crises. Prior to the second World War, in all of its crises at different periods, the world capitalist market enjoyed a relative stability. But the nature of the present crisis is such that this relative stability of the past exists no longer. The crisis has now turned into a daily, an hourly affair. You can understand therefore that whereas the advanced capitalist countries fought no less than two world wars among themselves in their bid to capture the market even while the whole of the world market was under their control, in the present condition of an extremely squeezed-in world capitalist market the situation is no longer such that the industrial owners of a backward capitalist country like India could at will sell their industrial products in competition with the advanced capitalist countries.

Task of completing agrarian revolution in our country today is intertwined with the task of accomplishing anti-capitalist socialist revolution

Thus, this being the condition of the world capitalist market, the Indian capitalists do not have a market for even the small volume of production they make, let alone go on increasing the production continuously. As I told you before, this absence of the market does not mean however that the people of the country don't have any needs, or that they don't want to buy. The type of clothes most of the poor peasants of this land wear — don't they feel like wearing better clothes, don't they wish to dress their children nicely ? Don't they wish to provide good food for their children ? When somebody around eats rasogollas[9]  , doesn't a poor peasant feel like eating rasogollas himself ? Doesn't he wish to give some to his child ? They do, but what of it ? How could they have the means ? To be relieved of the pangs of this inability they invoke their fate, call it the will of God, or seek consolation in senseless utterings. Else, they try to satisfy the child giving it a lump of sugar or gur[10]. How could they have the ability to buy good things ? In this condition, how could the market within the country expand, how could the development of industries go on unhindered ? How could new industries come up ? On the contrary, not to speak of new industries coming up, even the existing factories and mills are closing down, one after another, owing to the market crisis of the capitalists under the present capitalist economic system. In the given situation, whereas for a backward country like ours the need was to carry on industrialization with ever new initiatives, it is the prevailing production system in the country with its motive of earning maximum profit on the basis of capitalist production relations, in a word, the prevailing capitalist economic system which stands out as the main obstacle today to unhindered industrial development. This in fact is giving rise to the crisis in industry despite ours being a backward country. It can be seen, therefore, unless this obstacle can be removed we cannot open the door of uninterrupted industrial development. And so long as this task remains unfulfilled, we cannot complete the half-baked task of agrarian revolution — which means modernizing and mechanizing agriculture and providing employment to the entire rural population all through the year.

Therefore, to resolve the basic problem of the rural life and to bring about unhindered industrial development, we need to put an end to the present economic system, that is, the capitalist system, in a word — the system which runs on the capitalist production relation with the object of earning maximum profit. Doing away with the present capitalist state and the capitalist government, the rule of the workers and peasants has to be established, and in the place of the capitalist economic system the socialist economic system has to be established. That is, in a word, in order to accomplish this very task you have to organize anti-capitalist socialist revolution. But among the parties claiming to be Marxist-Leninists, neither the CPI(M), nor the CPI, in fact no one except our party, the SUCI, does openly stand for anti-capitalist revolution. What they say is that the main struggle of the exploited masses of India, that is, of the workers, peasants and the lower-middle class is against monopoly capital and feudalism. Let us now see what this anti-monopoly capital, anti-feudal struggle in a capitalist country like India means in real terms.

Bear it in mind, while it is the capitalist system as a whole from which stems this exploitation, then those who put the onus of this capitalist class exploitation as a whole on a handful of monopoly capitalists instead of taking the stand for overthrowing the capitalist state and the capitalist order as a whole are actually seeking to hide the character of the capitalist exploitation itself. Because, monopoly capitalism is but a form of capitalism itself. Therefore, if these people do not have the programme of anti-capitalist revolution then all their task of fighting monopoly capital reduces into an empty slogan, it is a fake slogan. Indira Gandhi[11] too delivers speeches against monopoly capital. The Chhatra Parishad[12] and the Youth Congress[13] too raise voice against monopoly capital. They also try to shield the bourgeois class as a whole from people's wrath by shifting the onus of all misdeeds of the bourgeoisie as a whole on to the shoulders of a few monopoly capitalists. So, flying the banner of Marxism, whether in the name of people's democratic revolution or of national democratic revolution, if some people engage in shielding the capitalist class as a whole, shifting the onus of bourgeois class exploitation on to a handful of monopoly capitalists, their real motive must be then like Indira Gandhi's.

Secondly, a little reflection also reveals that the slogan of these two parties for fight against feudalism is no more than an empty talk. Whatever the shape of capitalism in our country, howsoever backward it may be, but that capitalist exploitation is the main feature and that the exploitation perpetrated on all engaged in the agricultural economy is capitalist, too, is brought out clearly by analysis of the agricultural economy in this country. Just for the sake of argument if we accept, for the time being, that feudal relations continue to hold in the agricultural economy of our country as maintained in the analyses of these parties, even so, as every student of Leninism knows, the moment the national bourgeoisie of this country usurped the state power, India became a bourgeois state. Therefore, the main object of revolution becomes overthrowing the bourgeois state, no matter whether feudalism continues in agricultural economy or not.

Agricultural economy of our country is capitalist economy

Now let us see what is the nature of the agricultural economy of our country. From the preceding discussion we could gather that about eightyfive per cent of the rural population of our country have been reduced to the level of proletariat and semi-proletariat — they have lost all their land holdings, or are losing the same gradually. Adding to this the number of the somewhat well-off middle peasants, that is, those who own land from above fifteen to fifty or sixty bighas, who make up about ten or eleven per cent, it comes out that in the hands of the remaining five or six per cent of the rural population some fiftyfive to sixty per cent of the total lands of the country have become concentrated. This feature that, on the one side, most of the lands of the country have been concentrated in the hands of a few people, whereas, on the other side, most of the rural people, that is, eightyfive per cent of the rural population are reduced to the level of rural proletariat and semi-proletariat — what is the reason that it became so? All with a modicum of knowledge of economics will understand that this came about following the inexorable law of the capitalist economy.

Secondly, you should realize and constantly bear in mind that it is the capitalist state of India and the capitalist economic system which is the root cause of the exploitation and oppression perpetrated on you. Whether in the factories of the towns or in the lands of the villages, production is being carried on everywhere on the basis of the capitalist production relation. Everybody understands it easily that the character of the production relation as the basis of production in the factories in the urban areas in our country is the owner-wage labourer. In the rural economy, too, in this country this character of production relation is basically that of the owner-wage labourer. Though in India, as a backward country, the form of this owner-wage labourer relation in the rural areas differs from place to place depending upon specificities of localities and regions, peculiarities of the people, still its basic character everywhere at present is that of the owner-wage labourer. In some places the labourer is a monthly wage earner, in some other places he is a daily wage labourer. It may be that in some places a section of the agricultural labourers even own land from one to three bighas each. But they are wage labourers. Some of them are paid the wage — part in money, part in food. Some others receive a share of the crop in place of wage in money. In this country we call this type of labourers share-croppers, maybe some of them even own land of a bigha or two. But all these are only different forms of the same owner-wage labourer relation, depending upon the specificities of a region and pecularities of the people in a backward capitalist economy of today. Because, all of them work as wage labourer in others' lands. And, this very relation of owner-wage labourer in the sphere of production is called capitalist production relation.

Examining the issue from another angle also will help you realize that in the rural economy in our country production takes place on the basis of the capitalist relations. What is it we call capitalism ? The fundamental economic law of capitalism is that, based on capitalist-wage labourer production relation, capital grows by investment of capital — whether it is investment in land or in industry — that is, to grow capital through production by investing capital. In the capitalist system, the capitalists invest capital and produce goods in mills and factories. By selling the goods in the market they come out with profit which is the amount in excess over the invested capital. This profit they garner by exploiting the worker, exploiting the labour-power of the worker, depriving him of his due wage. This is what we call capitalism. Let us examine now the character of our rural economy. Is it the character of the rural economy today that like in the feudal system the owners of the lands produce mostly for their own consumption and, to meet the other necessities of living, they sell part of this produce in the local market as per the law of this local market ? Or, whether the land owners produce in the lands with an eye on the demands of the national market ? Moreover, is the price of the agricultural produce in the village fixed in terms of the law of the local market, or is the agricultural commodity transformed into commodity of the national market today ? Turn on the radio set and you can listen to that all the agricultural produce is being controlled today by the share market, wholesale market and the stock exchange. The land owners are selling their produce in the market as per the prices fixed by them and they are increasing their capital thereby. Thus, today, the land too is transformed into a means or instrument of capital investment like the factory is. Thus, it is seen, that through investment of capital in the land capital is growing. Besides, I pointed it out earlier, the production of agricultural commodity by land owners through investment in land also takes place on the basis of the owner-wage labourer relation, that is, on the capitalist production relation itself — whatever its form depending upon the specificities and pecularities of regions and people.

Therefore, all these features — the concentration of most of the lands in the hands of a few, the continuous decline of most of the village people to the level of the proletariat and semi-proletariat, the transformation of the land into a means of capital investment, agricultural production taking place on the basis of owner-wage labourer relation and, above all, the transformation of the agricultural produce into commodities of the national market — they go to demonstrate that the Indian agricultural economy is wholly capitalist economy. However backward and underdeveloped Indian capitalism is, except as hangover of feudal habits, conduct and behaviour in the cultural life of the country and in the rural relationships, nowhere in land relation or in agricultural production relation does feudal relation linger to be present. The capitalist agricultural production relation has taken its place, whatever may be its form on account of differences in the specificities and peculiarities of regions and people, and trade and commerce in agricultural commodity too run according to the laws of the capitalist national market.

However, on the grounds that farming in our country is not carried out with tractor-machines, or that there are the hangovers of old feudal habits and practices in the Indian cultural life and in the rural relations, those who deny that the agricultural economy of our country is capitalist economy actually display utter ignorance of how capitalism makes inroads into agricultural economy in a backward country in this era of imperialism and proletarian revolution. In the eighteenth century, when capitalism was progressive, world revolution was in the stage of capitalist revolution, capitalism was making strides through uncompromising struggle against religion, on the one hand, and the feudal system, on the other hand, a revolutionary transformation of production and industrialization on extensive scales was taking place on the basis of capitalist relation itself, capitalism made inroads into agriculture with tractor-machines for supply of raw materials to meet the requirements of industrialization and create surplus labour out of the majority of the village people for absorption in the industries. But in this era of imperialism and proletarian revolution, when capitalism has not only turned reactionary but is in its third intensive phase of world market crisis and let alone creation of employment made possible through setting up new industries, production in the existing industries is coming down or has to be closed down because of absence of the market and this is leading to further aggravation of the unemployment problem, capitalism can no longer effect modernization and mechanization of agriculture with tractor-machines in its own interest.

On the grounds that in the interest of capitalism itself the capitalists cannot go about modernizing agriculture with tractor-machines, it cannot however be concluded that the rural economy in our country is not capitalist economy. It is by breaking the feudal relation that capitalism is making inroads into this backward or underdeveloped economy. In its own interest, however, capitalism is engaging in the bid to tie down the majority of the rural people to the land in order that the unemployment problem did not assume such dimensions under whose weight this order could collapse and the revolution for the overthrow of the existing state could materialize. If millions of people in the villages are thrown off unemployed in just one stroke, then this vast army of the unemployed would explode in towns and villages and no kind of state machinery could save the situation. That is why, under this capitalist system in our country, full-scale modernization and mechanization of the agricultural system conducive to industrialization is no longer possible. Hence this capitalist conspiracy to tie down the majority of people to the rural economy in a half-clad, half-starved state. The land reform programme of the Congress, the agent of the ruling bourgeoisie, and the approach and programme of the votaries of national democratic and people's democratic revolution on the issue of land reform, are just revelations of this conspiracy.

Secondly, you should bear in mind, since in this era of imperialism and proletarian revolution capitalism developed in our country in the period when the bourgeoisie at the international level had become extremely reactionary, this capitalism grew up in compromise with religion and feudalism. Because of this, ours being a backward country, feudal hangover in habits and practices persist as admixtures in the basic capitalist relation and exploitation in the process of agricultural production, just like an impurity mixing up in gold. In this case, whom to deal the blow ? The hangover, or capitalism which is the root cause of exploitation ? In these circumstances, people who advocate dealing the blow to whatsoever feudal remnants persist as admixtures in the capitalist exploitation in this backward country instead of advocating for the overthrow of capitalism, are in reality pleading for the capitalist exploitation itself, no matter the rhetoric they employ against the bourgeoisie. You should grasp this point clearly. You should realize, the main enemy of the revolutionary struggle of the workers, peasants and the lower-middle class is the bourgeoisie of our country who are in state power. People who seek to create confusion over this issue in particular, who try to mislead on this matter and highlight the minor issues, much less important issues relatively, in order to hide the real truth and distract attention from the main enemy thereby, are actually subverting the people's cause even as they claim to be Marxist-Leninists.

So, from every angle we find that of the three problems in the peasant's life one concerns provision of adequate employment to the surplus population whose numbers will be growing every day, to those who cannot be allotted land and will be the surplus numbers after distribution of the recovered lands. Another problem concerns modernization and mechanization of agriculture. And the solution to both these basic problems is inseparably linked with the issue of industrial revolution and opening the door to unhindered development of industries. And unhindered progress of industries we can achieve only when we can free production from the capitalist production relation and profit motive, overthrowing the capitalist state and capitalist economic system with the force of the anti-capitalist revolution.

But if it transpires that a party calling itself Marxist-Leninist has also adopted 'land to the tiller' as the basic and the sole programme of its land reform policy, it follows then that they too seek, in a different verbiage and a different approach though, to tie down the majority of the rural people to three bighas, one and half bighas of land in the half-starved and half-clad condition of primitive uncivilized men. This could only be the task of the political agents of the capitalists who seek to extend the lease of life of capitalism — this is no task of the Marxist-Leninists. The Marxist-Leninists would want development of agriculture, they would stand for modernization and mechanization of agriculture. They would seek to demolish the whole moribund system for that matter. They would do away with capitalism because this capitalism stands out as the main hurdle to carrying out this demolition. At the same time they would voice the slogan of 'land to the tiller', they would also raise voice for scientific method in agriculture. Indeed it strikes me when I hear these Marxist-Leninists call for 'stop introduction of tractor-machines as this will go to aggravate unemployment'. I find it in the programme of some of these parties that in respect to the peasant movement it is their policy to resist introduction of tractor-machines and to unite this movement to resist tractor-machines with the revolutionary line to overthrow feudalism. What a self-contradiction[14] ! I just cannot make head or tail of it. Why to unite the anti-tractor-machine movement with the struggle to overthrow feudalism ? It is the introduction of tractor-machines which is to go to overthrow feudalism in the rural economy. That is what happens. Is introduction of tractor-machines getting obstructed by feudalism ? See, this is the same policy-plan like that of the bourgeoisie to oppose tractor-machines — the bourgeois politics to guard capitalism against the thrust of unemployment, something like the bourgeois land reform policy. In the situation where, say, in the course of a peasant movement, peasants become unemployed as a result of introduction of tractor-machines, then while rallying them in the movement against that particular move, I will explain to them that the people are not against introduction of tractor-machines. The peasant, in fact, favours introduction of tractor-machines. How could uplift of the rural economy be otherwise possible ? How could the rural life improve ? How could the woes of agricultural labourers and poor peasants come to an end ? How could the market expand ? How could the door to industrial revolution open up ? How could production of agricultural commodities or raw materials for the industry be made possible ? And the food problem of the country be solved ?

So, for the cause of progress, for ending the sufferings of the agricultural labourers and poor peasants, to remove darkness from the rural life, modernization and mechanization of agriculture is a necessity. But in today's situation this cannot be achieved under the capitalist system. If attempted, a very vast section of the agricultural labourers and poor peasants will be thrown off unemployed in one single stroke. Even the small provision for sustenance they have will come to cease. Hence, before overthrowing the capitalist state and economic order and installing the socialist state and economic system in its place, it is not possible to lay hand on this task. Whereas, without modernization and mechanization of agriculture, the sufferings and woes of and the darkness that prevails in the rural life at present cannot be eliminated too. Therefore, for the sake of survival and in the interest of uplift of the rural life, the agricultural labourers, landless peasants, poor peasants, lower-middle peasants are all to come together without further delay and join forces with the industrial proletariat and other working masses to engage in the task of accomplishing the anti-capitalist revolution. So, they are to prepare for replacing capitalism and till the time they could replace capitalism, the right slogan on the issue of introduction of tractor-machines should be : Give us alternative employment, else we will not allow tractor-machines. We, the agricultural labourers and peasants, we are for modernization of agriculture. It is introduction of tractor-machines which is exactly what we want, and exactly for that we need to overthrow capitalism, because overthrowing capitalism will ensure unhindered progress of industry, modernization and mechanization of agriculture will be made possible, opening the road to all-out uplift of the rural life will be possible, and thus it will be possible to change this face of the rural life.

You must have realized from this discussion that this question of completing the half-baked agrarian revolution in our country, that is, modernization and augmentation of agricultural production and the question of providing permanent employment to the surplus population in land is deeply interwoven with the question of accomplishing anti-capitalist socialist revolution. This being the real problem, those in our country who are voicing the slogan of national democratic or people's democratic revolution instead of taking to the programme of anti-capitalist socialist revolution, who are agitating the peasants with firebrand revolutionary slogans are in reality staging mock fights for certain reforms only within the existing capitalist economic order. By this act, indirectly though, they are only helping to strengthen the present capitalist rule. Remember, until and unless you can overthrow this capitalist economic order with the force of revolution, the order which this capitalist state protects and keeps going with its police, military, judiciary, and until you can establish in its place your own police, military, court and judiciary, that is, your own state, you cannot bring about industrialization in accord with your needs, nor can you change the face of the village. There will be no solution to the basic problems of the peasant life. This is indeed the main problem confronting at present the movement for the peasant's emancipation.

Peasant cadres should give up reactionary, superstitious mentality and practice revolutionary politics

To accomplish this anti-capitalist revolution, which great task devolves upon you, you should grasp a few things more in the first place. Bear it in mind, if in your thoughts and outlook you remain victim of the reactionary and superstitious mentality of the old society, you cannot bring this great revolution to success. But you will notice, the same attitude still prevails in some measure in many of you. For instance, most of you carry the mentality that when you are in want, you have no means to pull through, you cannot pay the usurious interest to the money-lender, you come together then and make protests. If your immediate demands come to be realized, you think you have achieved everything, nothing remains to be done. You come to believe, by organizing yourselves and waging some fights and all that, sparing no means whatever, you could evade to pay the interest to the money-lender. You can never convince yourselves to think that you have not evaded to pay the interest. Because, the money-lender has no right to charge you usurious interest. You never think that by charging you in this way the money-lender was committing a crime and you resisted it by fighting against him. You think on the contrary, you have evaded paying the interest. Your enemy resides in the recess of your mind — it is the wrong sense of religiosity which the owners inculcate in your mind to undo you. They tell you : 'Don't you obey God ? Is it the bidding of your faith that you won't pay the interest for the loan you took ?' And you nod to agree. I would ask : Is the religious sense to be invoked only when it comes to charging the interest ? Has it no other meaning than just this ? If that be so, then this religious sense had better be gone. If religion has nothing to do in matters of ending the sufferings and woes of people, in stopping perpetration of injustice upon them, resisting police repression, providing jobs to people, then better bid farewell to that religion. The religious sense which teaches merely to pay interest to the money-lender brings ruin only. Anyway, this sort of religious sense prevails in you. With this religiosity you won't be able to accomplish revolution. Revolution and this religious sense do not go together. Those who want to win freedom from subjugation, who want to change the face of the village, who want this capitalist exploitative system replaced, if they remain in so narrow a world — victims of the canons of scripture, bigoted habits and superstitions — can they accomplish revolution ? Is it possible for them to liberate the country from the shackles of capitalist exploitation ? Remember, those workers and peasants would be capable of running the industries and the agriculture of the country under their own control, running their own state, own police force and judiciary after demolishing this vast and overbearing capitalist state, who are free from superstitions and from this religiosity — peasants who are upright, who have the spirit to wage struggle, who have rectitude and are capable of laying down their lives. Those peasants can achieve it who realize that to live like humans, to build the road for their children to live like humans, they have to struggle against all oppressions, all injustice and superstitions. To acquire this make-up of mind you will have to practise the revolutionary politics.

Give up mistaken attitude to rural gentry

In this connection I need to discuss yet another aspect. It is, you have in you so many wrong perceptions about the rural gentry. Exploiting others they are quite enjoying themselves in this exploitative social system, and most of them who have left the village to reside in the town are having a good time. Occasionally they visit the village when they dole out some money and maybe they will donate for a make-shift bridge, hand out some funds for the school committee, and with all this they get themselves accepted by you as noble-hearted donors. Parting with a few silvers from the millions of rupees, from the vast riches amassed in their troves by sucking your blood, they contrive each to present himself as a noble donor. And you come to think, the master landlord is noble-hearted. You receive them with garlands when they set foot in the village. For, you think the master has done a lot for the village. Not for once you pause to think wherefrom came the money into the master's pocket which he doled out. Or, why he did need to donate. Why should you accept charity from him who robbed you of your money by cheating you ? The selfsame man who looted your money by fraud doled out a very petty sum out of it and had himself received as a noble donor. So weak-kneed are you that just because you need seeds for cultivation, you need a road bridge in your village, no sooner the master obliged than you became his purchased man. Those whose fleecing brought ruin to the village got themselves looked upon by you as noble-hearted great souls, setting foot in the village once and sinking a tubewell, laying a road, once constructing a make-shift bridge, or setting up an elementary-level school. And you too started thinking that the master is indeed a good soul, he has a very magnanimous heart. A rogue actually who cheats you to bring ruin to your life played the tricks to get himself reckoned by you as a noble donor, and in this way exactly you are getting yourselves cheated through the ages. You got yourselves fooled by this circumstance because you lack revolutionary consciousness, thoughts, education and a firm base of your own organization, everything in fact. You must give up this mentality which still persists in you.

Interest of revolution and organization should be regarded as far greater than individual interest

Other than this, you will notice, because of the lack of correct revolutionary political consciousness while leading the peasant movements, the sense of individual interest sometimes raises its head very dangerously under impact of daily privations, and this harms the revolutionary movement. As is the case with the owners of big land holdings who have greed and avarice for property and for which they cheat each other, the mentality in you too which is born of greed for private property spits venom during allotment of land amongst yourselves. As the owners of big land holdings are afflicted with immense greed for property, the same poisonous vice thrives in you too. Notice carefully, you will feel that so strong is your fascination for land and so deep your attachment to property you often get embroiled in bitter quarrels among yourselves during distribution of land as to who will receive allotment and who will not. Seldom you spare a thought to realize that all cannot get land at once. Even if you distribute equally the lands you recovered together, not everyone can get land. So, preserving the unity of the organization you the people of the village should sit together first to settle who are the ones among you who need to be allotted land in the first place. After allotment to them first, if any land remains to be allotted then others will receive. Whereas, what happens, without first settling it among yourselves, everybody joins in the scramble to get land first. You start scrambling among yourselves for just two or three bighas of land, which perhaps you won't be able even to retain in the end. This tussle leads to infighting among you and as a result unity among people becomes its victim. Among the cadres of the organization not having that level of consciousness this even creates envy, bad blood and infightings. With what outcome ? Thereby you weaken your own organization.

To resolve the problem arising from land distribution and allotment, you should attend to two measures. First, since the land you recovered by your struggle falls short of what is required by all who need land, so instead of undermining your organization by fighting among yourselves you should first sit together in your village under the leadership of the party or the leadership of the local committee of the Krishak O Khetmajur Federation to settle whose needs among you come foremost. Say, for example, the case of an able-bodied poor peasant. He has a holding of one katha[15] and he can anyhow make some earnings by his labour. Another peasant residing next to him is old and incapacitated, he too has a holding of one katha. Both have want in their families. But of the two the one who is able-bodied somehow does some sundry jobs, he can somehow run his household even by carrying head-loads if needed. Whereas, the old man is without the same capacity. If now the question of land allotment arises between these two, then if he were a conscious peasant cadre, a revolutionary, the able-bodied peasant would offer on his own that the old peasant should receive first and he will get if land in excess is available. Such should be the attitude of everyone. If all of you have this attitude, no agent of the enemy can succeed to drive a wedge into the organization, no one from outside can create a division within you.

Problem of land distribution is to be resolved by keeping intact organization's unity

Secondly, you have got it in the Report here that in many places during land allotment poor and landless peasants sat together and with the help of the leadership they have resolved the issues democratically. Maintaining their trust and confidence in the party and the party leadership they have preserved the organization's unity like the apple of the eye. For no reasons whatsoever, at no one's instigation either, did they allow the unity and solidarity to suffer. Because, you have witnessed how in such cases not only the counterrevolutionary parties but even those who masquerade as revolutionaries and by the red banner confuse the poor peasants, they too instigate poor people to fight against poor people. Say, you have recovered three bighas of benam land by your struggle, while another party came up flying the red banner and they instigated some peasants by stoking up petty self-interest in them to come to fight against you and seize the land. You should know, by inciting petty self-interest no noble task can be accomplished. What happens when a party goes after confusing you in this way, with such unfair conduct and reprehensible acts ? The poor masses become divided among themselves. Divided under banner of this and that party, the poor peasants start fighting each other. Due to sheer opportunist politics of these sham red flag-waving parties, the jotedars who are the bourgeoisie of the rural society get the opportunity of watching these infights among you and they merrily enjoy this. Even more, these jotedars, when they find it expeditious, themselves pay some money to some poor peasants to send them with the red banner in hand, so that they shout a few militant revolutionary slogans, gather up a few bighas of land from this or that corner and having misguided the poor peasants they set up a separate organization among them. How do they carry out this act ? Say, some lands were recovered and from these some peasants got land while some others did not get anything. Immediately after, an agent of the jotedars or someone from a counterrevolutionary party came up to mislead those who received no land : 'Just see, they gave land to the others but not to you. Join our party, we will snatch away those lands'. Because they had not received land, so these peasants thereupon left their organization to join this agent. This manoeuvre amounts to treachery within one's own home. Thus, at every turn of issue, at minor turns and passing issues, the focal point of your base politics, that is, the revolutionary preparation for transforming the capitalist state and capitalist economy is getting undermined. With the organization so loosely knit, its cadres shifting from this to that organization for self-interest, revolution cannot come about. With the poor peasants engaging in infights over allotment of land, they cannot accomplish revolution. They cannot be revolutionaries, after all, who instigate some poor people to seize the lands of other poor people. These are some common but pertinent considerations — you must be alive to them.

Sad history of forcible conversion of social property into individual property

Remember, it is true the peasant is to wage struggle to get land, but he need not indulge in greed for land. To get land is a just demand of yours. Because, it was your ancestors who fought ferocious animals, cleared forestlands and dug up rocky wastes to make land cultivable. 'God created cultivable lands and made the landlords owners of these lands' — no, nobody became the owner that way. All members of society together made land suitable for cultivation. Long past, all men in society lived together divided into clans and they wandered from one place to another in quest of livelihood. Thus wandering they came to settle in different places in the course of that quest. Then it was almost humanly impossible struggles they had to carry out against tigers, say, and many other ferocious animals, against nature as a whole, and with inhuman toil they cleared forestlands and turned rocky and barren lands suitable for cultivation. After making the land suitable for cultivation when they settled down permanently and started raising crops then some chieftains among them who had greater muscle power and could use force in their interest became the owners of land, depriving others through sheer force. Who did thus forcibly appropriate the wealth which was created by the labour of all the people together ? They were the forefathers of the zemindars you know today.

The big owners with their sleek look you witness today — some hundred or thousand years back their ancestors did not have so shapely, graceful feet, say, as today, they were not as gentlemanly then. They lived off muscle power, the gang leaders of robbers. In the initial stage they lived together with your forefathers, they struggled together. Afterwards, through sheer force they became the masters, the ruling elite, the feudal lords. Thereafter, during the British rule, they served the British and became the zemindars. So it happened that the lands which all people had one day collectively made fit for cultivation with hard toil and over which all the people of society had an equal right, the same lands were subsequently usurped through sheer force by a band of men who deprived you criminally. Therefrom came the monarchical system, feudalism from it, the zemindar system thereafter during the British rule. Now they have established individual ownership over lands. Now they are instilling it in you that these are all the properties of the owners and you are the slaves of the owners. So, as slaves, your sacred duty is to protect your master's property. That you are born slaves is the consequence of your sins in the preceding life. Whereas, the masters are born the owners as a reward for the virtuous work in their preceding life, so they drink and outrage women as they desire. On the other hand, for all your many commissions you have turned out to be their slaves today. For thousands of years they have been teaching you that the king is on a par with God. The king is God himself whether the king is a tyrant, he is given to drunken revelries, is an outrager of women. You are obliged to serve him. Driving this into your head they have even turned your mind servile. For, you have forgotten a history of thousands of years. There lies behind a sad history of how a handful of men became the owners of all lands and you became their slaves. You who will take on political activity, if you will just keep to struggling on the demand for land, wage-rise and relief, you cannot have fostered in you that sustainable strength to draw upon for that struggle. You ought to know this history. Leaders and cadres of the party will relate to you this history. As you will come to know of it, it will spark off a fire in you. How come you are slaves today in the same land which your ancestors had all collectively made fit for cultivation, together you had owned it collectively. And even if someone has belief in the existence of God, it has to be presumed that he by no means made anybody master or owner of the land. How were you dispossessed forcibly of the lands ? Later, when the owners set themselves up as the rulers in order to retain the ownership over this land, they made it the law and you came to submit to it, obeying the law as you went about, forgetting the sad history of how you got dispossessed of the lands.

Later, towards the end of the British rule, under the Rayatwari Act [16] ownership was allowed to those who held tenancy of land. But, these land-tenants could hardly avail of this provision because of their ignorance, their lack of awareness and the weakness of the organization. The big landowners deprived them by fraud on legal provisions and, in connivance with officials, they usurped those lands. Afterwards, during the rule of the Congress government, when the Abolition of Middle Proprietary Act or the Zemindari Abolition Act was enacted — I told you about it earlier — poor peasants were deprived and others appropriated most of the lands in connivance with officials. Even so, the very few among you who got whatever land, could not retain the same land. How did that land go out of your hands ? It became the grist of the grinding mill of capitalist exploitation which in fact stands out at present as the main obstacle on your way to survival — the one without overthrowing which you have no prospect of emancipation. Should you now want to secure a firm base for your struggle against this prevailing capitalist social system, you should know the past history to some extent. Only in this way will you be able to sustain strength in this struggle. Only then could you free yourselves from the deceit of the religious sense, from the guiles of sense of property. Long back your ancestors were overwhelmed by muscle-men, by the might of chieftains, and they made you slaves. Grabbing the lands by force they became the masters. But the same poisoned blood runs in your veins too. For which you start scrambling among yourselves over possession of three meagre patches of land, or one patch of land — just that. This is the same poisoned blood as flows in the veins of the zemindars. They battle over big lands, you too are victim of the same illusion centring round land. Just for, say, two or three kathas, eight kathas, or a bigha or two of land, even poor peasants are fighting poor peasants over possession of land. On the contrary, it should have been your task that you will recover all benam and vested lands and you will distribute these lands first among those who are the most needy, the poorest and the most helpless by comparison, and ensure that no ill-feeling ensues among you by any means over this distribution. Because, ill-feeling will undermine the unity among you. Consequently, the ultimate struggle against capitalism will suffer.

Abjure your individual interest for the cause of revolution and organization, learn revolutionary politics

I said earlier, to grasp all these you are to learn the revolutionary politics. Only then you can realize all these. From whom will you learn the revolutionary politics and how ? Remember, to learn the revolutionary politics it is the prime requisite that in the first place you will recognize the revolutionary party and develop voluntary submission to that party. In the second place, learn the revolutionary politics, as you engage in day-to-day struggles, from those political workers equipped with the revolutionary politics who can reveal layer by layer the truth of everything around. But the fact is, you are just not following this. You do not participate in the organization to learn politics. Rather, you look for something or other from your organization. Or, you ask them to look after your court case. If your need could not be fulfilled, you get into a bad mood. I might ask you here whether the need to organize your revolutionary political party is to plead for your court cases. What is your necessity for the leader ? Remember, the leaders are the commanders of the people's army. They guide you in two ways. Firstly, they give you counsel, wise guidelines, help you build revolutionary character and teach you how to attain the right outlook to judge each problem. On the other, they acquaint you with the intricacies and concrete form of the struggle against your powerful enemy, its police-military organs, all its diverse means and trickeries. But, as things go, you do not learn these from your leaders. You would rather like them to work as pleaders for your case. To that I say, a pleader can be hired with money — what is the need of a revolutionary party for that ? You take the party workers to be your pleaders for free. You seem to think, since you have cast your vote for the party, you participate in the processions they organize and lend your voice for the slogans raised, so they will do the pleader's job for you for free. The truth is that they do it but not in return for something. To do it for you is part of their work. But you should realize, if you keep them busy this way for all the twentyfour hours a day, when are they going to teach you politics ? When will they organize you ? When will they build up your volunteer corps ?

Another mentality is also noticeable in the ordinary-level peasants among you. Facing a problem, they would rather go straight to a leader of high level, if they get him close at hand, rather than go to the village committee. Their idea is that with a big leader his capacity to get them some concession is also greater. For this, they do not feel happy unless they approach the big leader. If this way thousands of peasants keep the high ranking leaders busy every day with their day-to-day problems, how could the party leaders get time to effect big plans for developing the organization, building party committees in the villages and larger areas, and imbue thousands of people with the revolutionary ideology to develop a steel-strong organizational base ? If you would persist in your practice of pleading with the leaders only for getting you a land, asking them to plead with the court offices in favour of your case, get something for you from the BDO[17] , arrange something for your son, and if you argue that some one else has got what he had asked for and so he can stay in the organization but why you will stay if you do not get your needs fulfilled, then you will be gravely harming your own cause. You need to remember, all this thinking goes against your revolutionary movement, your united struggles. Because, as a result of this mentality and mode of thinking, self-interest becomes more dominant than the greater interest of keeping the organization alive. As a result, the Krishak O Khetmajur Federation, the instrument of your day-to-day struggle, gets weakened. With the Krishak O Khetmajur Federation getting weakened, your collective interest comes to suffer in the end. You must therefore wage a resolute struggle against this mentality and train the peasant cadres with proper political education.

There is another important issue in this regard which I intend to discuss with you. I explained firstly that so long as the capitalist state exists some of your problems might be solved through reforms within its framework or by realizing some demands in the course of movements. But unless this capitalist state could be overthrown with the force of revolution and seizure of power by workers and peasants did materialize, all the problems in the peasants' lives will not be solved, these cannot be solved. You should as well grasp clearly what this seizure of power by workers and peasants means. You should remember, that workers and peasants seizing power does not mean securing ministerial positions by formation of a government through elections within the framework of the present state. Workers and peasants seizing power means workers and peasants establishing their own state by overthrowing this capitalist state, workers and peasants setting up their own police-military organs in the place of the capitalist police-military organs, installing a system of justice conducive to the interests of workers and peasants in the place of the present judicial system of the capitalist state, that is, completely restructuring the judiciary anew on the basis of the socialist ideology and principles, this new system being conducted by those who are from the ranks of workers and peasants — in a word, workers and peasants themselves running their own state. Till creation of this situation, even though it may be possible to realize some demands in the course of movements or by way of negotiation with the authorities, the real problems of the poor people cannot be solved. Politically conscious peasant cadres will explain this point to others. Because, it is often seen that whenever an issue is not resolved and remains unresolved, some elements from an agent party of the owners come in to create division among you. They say many adverse things to sow confusion in you about your organization. Pointing to a leader of the organization they would say : 'Well, he is now an MLA, a minister at that, but what has he done for you ?' That leader did a lot for you, as far as possible, or, maybe, he could not do many things, and you can understand that it is not possible either to solve all the problems before revolution. So, it comes down to knowing which party it is which has taught the poor to stand up with head high for the cause of revolution — the revolution without which all your problems cannot be solved, which party it is which has taught the peasants to rally in their organization for the cause of revolution. This shall be the moot point with you. Whereas, over this issue at different times, even over trifles, serious confusions are seen to prevail among you. Taking full advantage of this, your opponent party and the agents of the enemy undermine your organization, the one which is the prime instrument for your struggle. So, you must give up this mentality in the interest of the struggle for your own emancipation.

What should be the character of the organization

Now I should discuss a few aspects concerning the organization. You should first realize what should be the character of that steel-strong organization which I am urging you to build up — I mean, in a word, the kind of organization at one whistle-call of which, a bugle call, a beat of drum, or a stroke on a dhol[18] all people in the village will at once rush out with anything handy as weapon. Say, the village party committee gave a call with drum-beat for rallying in a procession — at once all the youth, boys and girls together rose to their feet. They left aside the other jobs to be done later. For, they have understood, the organization is like the apple of the eye. If the eye is lost, man turns blind. Likewise, if the organization becomes weak then the collective strength of people becomes weaker too. Thus, such like shall be the character of the organization that on a single instruction from the party you can rise to your feet all prepared, be it for a meeting, a procession, a battle with the opponent, a contingency to proceed to a place, a rally in the locality or elsewhere. This ability to take a decision collectively on the basis of the party's ideology and base political line, this ability to move collectively is what we call the organization. You should remember that some people merely assembling under the signboard of the party, or gathering around some leaders and together engaging in activity under the direction of the leader — just these do not add up to be called a political organization. As is often found, in different areas each one of the cadres sits out waiting for instructions to come from leaders and when the instruction comes from above they probably try best to put the same into effect. But collectively on their own they cannot take a decision on the basis of the party's ideology and base political line, they cannot take initiative on an issue. Even if a number of people come together into a kind of loose structure, that cannot be called a proper political organization, let alone a revolutionary organization.

Keep in mind also to resolve whatever bickerings arise among yourselves with the help of the party's local leadership — such should be the nature of the organization. Should it happen that you cannot agree to the decision of the local leadership then you will appeal to the higher committee or to a higher leader. But you must not move the court of law over issues involving yourselves, you must not disrupt the organization having developed bad blood, must not weaken the organization. Why do you need to go to court ? If the owners get you entangled in a court case, then of course you have to approach the court. But as poor people you should never go to the court over feuds among yourselves. You will resolve all your feuds at your own village committee, local party committee, or the local committee of the Krishak O Khetmajur Federation. If any disagreements persist at this level, you will appeal to the higher committee. No expending money here, no hassle, no fear of getting trapped by touts or unscrupulous lawyers. You don't have to be afraid of becoming destitutes, or of any divisions coming in between you. Even when you are going to die you leave behind your unity intact. Remember, to go against the party or the organization over personal antagonism or animosity under any circumstances is against the grain of a revolutionary, an ideologically imbued worker or peasant. Also you should remember, because the allegiance of the members of the organization to the party committee and the party leadership is voluntarily inspired so it remains unquestioning in the interest of revolution. The party shall be at the helm of the mass fronts. To belittle it is to undermine the base line of struggle itself. These are teachings you ought to take to heart and propagate and spread among others.

Two types of organization — mass and party organization

You should know, the organization in which you rally to build up your struggles collectively are of two types. Consider, for instance, that together you take out processions, you do gherao, submit your demands, hold meetings, at times you get into direct clashes with the jotedars and the police — all these you do from an organization which we call the own class organization of the agricultural labourers and peasants. As for example, the poor peasants' and agricultural labourers' own class organization of your village is the Krishak O Khetmajur Federation which brings together all the poor peasants and agricultural labourers into its fold for waging struggles. Besides, there are the other various organizations of the peasants — for example, the co-operative, the village defence force, the volunteer corps, etc. You should however realize, simply with these organizations you cannot carry out the big task, you cannot make much headway. What can you achieve at the most only with this type of organizations? You come out together in order to realize those few demands with these organizations which you feel will stall your life unless these are won immediately. When these demands are realized, or when repression comes heavily down upon you in the course of your movement to win these demands, or if repression is brought to bear heavily upon the organization, the organization faces disruption, it starts disintegrating completely. Some people flee the organization out of fear. Maybe some others turn into agents. Some start deserting, some others are afraid to show up. Maybe they will not say as much in words that they are scared, in reality though they flee from fear. In this type of organizations many betray such attitudes. These happen because the activists of these organizations lack revolutionary political consciousness and political organizational strength.

There is a different type of organization which is built with those political workers who are tempered with revolutionary education and are from the mass organizations. It is the party organization. Within the mass organizations, those who are politically most conscious, who all have knowledge of the sad history of the lives of the workers and peasants, who know how man emerged in a long history after the origin of the earth, how agriculture came thereafter, how society was at that period, how did the lands collectively reclaimed turn into private property, what was the origin of private property in society, how arose the monarchy, the feudal lords, the babus, the usurers in the village community, the birth and development of capitalism, the capitalist state, the development of the industries, the proletariat class, the growth of the unemployment problem — that is, who know and understand the entire history of the woes and sufferings of the common people, and at the same time who know how to tackle all these, how to establish the workers' and peasants' state by overthrowing the present capitalist state, to run that state, to organize the army of the people, organize the police system, conduct the judiciary, and conduct the ideological propaganda as well as the ideological and theoretical struggle, in fact, those who will unitedly wage the battle against the present capitalist state and its police and military, staking their lives in this battle, never to betray its cause, never conducting themselves in debased and mean culture but possessing higher ethical and cultural standard, who are capable of performing the roles of commanders in the revolutionary struggle of the masses — it is comprising them that the party organization develops. So, we, the Marxist-Leninists, the revolutionaries, call them the members of the party organization who carry out the task of revolution having mastered revolutionary politics, who will transform the social order, change the world.

You should also know that within the party organization, in every locality, the higher party organization takes concrete shape in the party committee, the committee under which you work. Can this party committee be formed picking up anyone and everyone ? No. The party committee has to be formed with those from among the party workers who are capable of politically analysing all local problems whatsoever from the party's angularity and resolving them by maintaining party leadership over the common people. They lead the common people in their movements, at the same time they keep watch on the propaganda of the opponent party and expose the real character of these propaganda so that peasants and labourers are not misled. They also remain alert so that no agents from outside get an opportunity to carry out factional activities among peasants and labourers. They should have the ability to take care of all the problems of the agricultural labourers and peasants of the locality — for instance, the problems of fixing the minimum wage of the agricultural labourers, availability of round-the-year job, wage-increase in keeping with price-rise, the problem of irrigation, getting fertilizers and seeds at cheap rates, problems relating to lands, those arising from day-to-day struggles, keeping peasants and labourers ever alert against all trickeries and misleading propaganda by the opponent parties. They should be capable of taking appropriate steps to maintain the unity and solidarity of peasants and agricultural labourers against any attempts of the hostile agent party to disrupt their unity. They are to be equipped so as to be able to take political classes of the peasants. In plain language, the party committee is the body which is capable of conducting all these tasks, acting in unison. From time to time they will approach the leaders to get an understanding of the plans and programmes, but every day they do not send the common peasants to the leaders. Rather, they themselves meet the necessities of common peasants and labourers.

I should tell you one more point here. Poor people in the village who become members of the committee, or members of the party, often ask a question. They argue : 'We are poor, at home we have problems of providing food for the family, or problems relating to farming, in fact a thousand problems in the family concerning wife and children. Where is the time to attend to the party work ?' Thus, whatever the party work assigned, it remains unattended. In situations like this the party committee becomes a party committee in name only. Remember, you are members of the party committee, which is to say, you are the most conscious section of party workers, you are the ones who are most eligible to be party volunteers. If you cannot come forward upholding the mentality and mental bent to go ahead disregarding all sorts of personal loss then all those around, those who are weak in mind, who lack revolutionary education and revolutionary political consciousness — they will become further weakened. All the more, this way of rationalization and posing of individual problems obviously will have greater retrograde effect on them. You should therefore understand, for the class conscious revolutionary worker this is entirely a wrong line of thinking. Because, the necessity to accomplish revolution with a view to overthrowing this exploitative capitalist system is greatest for the proletariat and semi-proletariat. If you are to win emancipation, even in the midst of these all too many wants and troubles flowing from your sufferings under capitalist exploitation, it is for you to come out, it is for you to take the initiative. Those in this society who live in ease and comfort, they will not do it for you. In all countries where revolution has been successful, if you will read the histories of these countries, you will gather that it was because the workers and peasants there, thousands in numbers, could rise above their personal needs and sufferings, and singularly they devoted themselves to carrying out the task of revolution — so revolution could succeed there.

Class correlation in the background of anti-capitalist revolution in India

Now try to understand clearly who is the main enemy of the revolution you are to accomplish in order to overthrow the Indian capitalist state, and who are your allies. In a word, understand clearly the correlation of classes in this society. Remember, the capitalists, the owners of benam lands, the big jotedars, big businessmen, the usurers, and the political party of theirs — the Congress — also the police-military of this state, and the bureaucrats and officials — these are the enemy of this revolution. Whereas, the life-force of the revolution is the industrial workers of the urban areas and the landless peasants, agricultural labourers and poor peasants of the villages. Besides, you are to draw into the fold of revolution the middle class and the lower middle-class in towns and villages so that they do not become counter-revolutionary and join the enemy's camp. With respect to the middle peasants and lower strata of the middle peasants of the villages you will have to conduct yourselves with such an attitude and ideological approach. Remember, not to speak of the urban lower-middle class, even the rural lower-middle class do not always stand against the class struggle unlike the police, the military, the officials of the judiciary, other reactionary officers, the capitalist class itself, big businessmen, big jotedars in the countryside and the reactionary upper-middle class who are all outright opponents of the communist movement and the emancipation struggle as well as class struggles of the workers and peasants. True, the rural middle-class, even the lower-middle class also, have a common tendency to oppose the class struggle. Since however they are also under attack, they are also victim of exploitation, peace is wanting in their families too, so if you pursue a realistic and effective approach in regard to them you can win them over to your side in the struggle for emancipation — though not as steadfast and unfaltering fighters, but as vacillating allies. If you can strongly organize the poor in the villages, if you can raise a strong storm of mass movements, movements of peasants and labourers against rich peasants, if you can build party committees in all rural areas and under the leadership of the party committee give birth to a steel-strong organization of landless peasants, agricultural labourers and poor peasants so that all the poor people in the village rise to their feet at one call, its impact is sure to fall upon the rural middle-class, and, in that event, it will be easier for you to rally them in your struggle.

Rally the rural middle-class and lower-middle class in the anti-capitalist revolutionary struggle

There is another point which too you should explain to the middle class. It is that the poor peasants of today have come from breakdown of the middle-class families. Young members of middle-class families do not get employment. They cannot move up the ladder to become bigwigs, they cannot take to big business and earn fabulous riches. When the crop is harvested, the middle class too has to sell out their produce to the traders at low prices. How many middle class peasants are there in this Birbhum district, who like Baidyanath Banerjee the owner of thousands of bighas of land and owner of coal mines, can store their produce in cold storages in their individual capacity ? And the owners build cold storages for business purpose, not for their own consumption. But a middle class peasant cannot store his produce even for the purpose of his own consumption. They have to sell out all their produce at the time of harvesting. The price at which they sell out to the traders is one, and the price at which they have to buy the same articles from the traders is one-and-a-half times to two times that. So, the condition of the middle class is not good either. It started from them that by the process of economic disintegration the poor peasants, agricultural labourers and landless peasants have arisen. If the middle class who own today, say, forty or fifty bighas of land have to live on land only, then under the impact of price-rise and due to growth of the family they gradually turn into lower-middle class peasants, then poor peasants, finally agricultural labourers. Therefore, unless the capitalist social system of India is demolished, the dominance of the village jotedars and owners of benam lands brought to an end, the absolute control over the rural commodity by businessmen and the stock exchange broken down, that is, the rural economy rid of their control, the problems of the middle class too — problems concerning improvement of cultivation, modernization of agriculture, necessary education and employment for the young members of their families — these will not be solved. Then why should they hang around the babus, the big landlords, the owners and go against the poor peasants and labourers and thus make both sides hostile ? To grow bigger, the high and the mighty do not only exploit the agricultural labourers, landless and poor peasants, they also deprive and exploit the middle class. Continually grabbing the lands of the middle class the big rich peasants concentrated vast lands in their hands and thus they became big jotedars. The village usurers cheat the middle class and the poor peasants and thus they run their money lending business. You should explain it to the middle class that they do not belong to the rich and it does not serve them to stay close to the babus. Explain it that in the given situation if they stay close to the rich and oppose the poor, how could the poor protect them from the rich ? Therefore they should not unnecessarily embroil themselves in conflict with the poor. On the contrary, if poor peasants and agricultural labourers have the middle class as allies in the battle against capitalism, the main enemy, against the big jotedars and the oppressive government of the country, then the local minor issues of conflict between the middle class, on the one hand, and the poor peasants and agricultural labourers, on the other hand, could be resolved easily under the leadership of the party committees. The local party committees can see to it that the middle class suffers less and the poor peasants demand less from them. However, in that case, the middle class must come to the help of the struggle of the agricultural labourers, poor and landless peasants. You could thus persuade the middle class and rally them in your movements.

Isolate the enemy from the broad masses

On your part you should realize too that winning the middle class over to your side is, to be sure, in the interest of your broadest struggle against the enemy. Because, if the middle class, the intermediary between you and your enemy, join strength with your enemy because of your wrong handling, that will only go to strengthen the hands of your enemy. On the other, if you can draw the middle class to your side by treading the correct line, you can thereby isolate the enemy from the broader masses and it will be easier for you to build your struggle stronger. So, you understand well, it is not wise for you too to conduct yourselves with unnecessary hostility towards the middle class. Unless the middle class themselves invite conflict, you should not turn them into your opponents in your main struggle against the big capitalists and the jotedars. If they, regarding themselves as the high and the mighty, do not treat you in an inimical way you should not get into conflict with them. Because, to win the battle, it is as much a task of yours, on the one hand, to create division in the enemy camp, as is, on the other, isolating the enemy from the broader masses as far as possible also a task of yours. That will make the battle less tough for you. But keep in mind here that if you try to get the middle class on your side by appeasing them, allowing indulgence to their opportunism due to their vacillating character, you will never succeed in your bid. Only if you can build your organization on the firm foundation of revolutionary political consciousness of all the agricultural labourers, landless and poor peasants of your village, will it be possible for you to effectively hold the middle class in the fold of the revolutionary movement. You should be vigilant also about another nature of the middle class. In regard to this keep always vigil on them even as you will be trying to draw in the middle class as an ally of your movement. Keep in mind, even as they may join your movement as an ally, they are the vacillating ally. They always move with a babu-like attitude. There is very much a tendency in them to despise the poor, the ploughman, farm workers, the landless peasants and agricultural labourers. Not that everyone has this attitude, but many have it. Because they have this tendency, and they have an inclination to rise to upper levels and be rich, they may inflict harm to the movement from within as and when the opportunity may come their way, even while they are fighting alongside you. So, at the same time as you will try constantly to draw the middle class into your movement and rally them with you, you will also be watchful about them.

If you are class conscious, you should also realize that to win your battle, and this is a common tactics in a battle, you will try to create division in the enemy camp in your own interest, should that be possible, and you will take advantage of any possible antagonism within the enemy camp. For example, in the antagonism between one jotedar and another, if you can handle one side a bit, that is, if you can tactfully handle one side and can manoeuvre to engineer a clash in the enemy camp itself, you get some advantage to crush the enemy. This is a common tactics in every battle. Often, however, it is seen that if an attempt is made to handle the antagonism between one rich person and another, some among you immediately get agitated over it. Because, they think a close liaison is perhaps being maintained with that rich person. You should give up this sort of foolish attitude. Remember, the more you could widen the rift in the enemy camp, the more you could foment contradiction and conflicts among them, the less severe would be their attack on you and the stronger will be the impact of your counterattack on the enemy. But in this regard you must constantly keep vigil so that no one could ever take recourse to it from personal fascination, personal consideration, keeping the party in the dark about it. It has to be undertaken always under the party committee's directive and party guidance. Else, this in itself will beget opportunism in the active workers of the organization. These are things to be understood very clearly.

Build workers' and peasants' own powerful volunteer corps

And, you have to build up your own powerful, disciplined and ideologically tuned volunteer corps. In this regard you should realize, first of all, that wearing a volunteer badge or participating in drills for some days does not make one a volunteer. A volunteer is one who serves a cause on his own will, which means he serves not in lieu of a payment. If you offer money, could there be a dearth of men willing to put in service ? So, one who argues : 'That person is an MLA, so I am serving him in the hope he will do something for me,' he cannot be a volunteer. He who serves for a reward, or does it hankering after something or in lieu of a remuneration is not reckoned a volunteer. Who were volunteers in fact ? Those sannyasis[19] of the past — Sri Ramakrishna and Vivekananda, for example — and those of the freedom struggle — revolutionaries like Netaji Subhas, Kshudiram, Chandrasekhar Azad, Bhagat Singh, Rajguru, Sukdev, for example — who all laid down their lives for the cause of the country. They did their work or courted death not in lieu of money from anyone. These were the men whose names immediately come to mind when one talks of volunteers, men who are revered by all — like the religious preachers of the past, later the social reformers, then the fighters of the national liberation struggles. Volunteers are those whose job is to work for others selflessly like these noble men, forsaking homes, families and kins, enduring scolding from every corner, sparing all consideration for own comforts. This is the same country however where today many of you enquire, if approached for enrolment as a volunteer : 'How much you say is the allowance to be paid to become a volunteer?' To such a low level have people of this country been induced to stoop in their thinking that they ask as to how can they be volunteers if no remuneration were paid even for some snacks and pocket money. You see this is the way they are accustomed to think. The bourgeois parties and the pseudo red flag-waving parties of this country contributed no less in creating this mental attitude among the people. Not to speak of the bourgeois parties, even the socialists and the pseudo red flag-waving parties have introduced the practice of engaging cadres in exchange of money in such a widespread manner that its harmful effect seems to escape notice of all. Because of the role of these parties, this degenerate mentality is gradually taking grip on the people and the party cadres, and also because of this the idea of a noble ideology ingrained in the word volunteer, prevailing at a time, has been obscured and muddled up today. For this, even many among you have no prick of conscience and quite easily you grow accustomed to thinking as to how you can undertake to do anything without being paid. I would put in : 'Why do people who think in these terms need to be volunteers ? They better go and enrol as police constables.' Remember, they are to be volunteers who have the consciousness grown in them that they will transform this society, they will usher in a new world. They will be the volunteers, those youth, who take on willingly this great responsibility, no matter whether they have to go with or without the barest of necessities, those who feel proud that they bear this responsibility.

Consider, for example, the instance of the peasants and workers of China who fought against the mercenary army of Ziang Ky-shek that received assistance from the different capitalist countries, especially from America. That mercenary army had the privilege of full military dresses, arms, vehicles, etc., together with regular salaries and also various illegitimate means of earning lots. Whereas, those peasants and workers who fought these mercenaries backed by capitalism and imperialism had none of these. Some wore a pajama, some wore lungis, some others half-pants, some had a vest to wear, some others a shirt to put on and even these were often torn — again some wore cloth-shoes, and some without this benefit even, went on fighting barefooted. Such was the look of the People's Liberation Army there. But it is the People's Liberation Army which ultimately inflicted a crushing defeat on the mercenary army paid by America and Ziang Ky-shek and drove them out of the country. What was the source of the strength with which they achieved this ? On the strength of dresses ? Or, was it on the strength of arms ? Look at how people in the jungles of Vietnam are fighting today. Children from peasant families, some twelve or thirteen years old, those whom we call kids, they too carry rifles on their shoulders. Even while they are doing chores at home, farming lands, as soon as they hear the bugle sounding for battle they leave aside the work on hand as it is, they even put down their food, get up from their beds, in whatever state they are they rush out with their rifles. It is for this that so big a power as America which has razed down that country by pouring down bombs, which spends thousands of crores of rupees every day for this war, which is out to slaughter the people of that land with its arms, tanks, napalm bombs and modern weaponry — even this America with all of these perpetrations now stands faced with defeat. It is thinking now, how it can flee Vietnam[20]. Why could not America win the war in Vietnam after all these ? It is because peasants in every village there, everyone from aged mothers even to the children in every family have ranged up in the battlefield there. All stand by a single vow — America has to be driven out. If you have nothing else on hand, take up your kitchen knife to fight the enemy. If that too is unavailable, just bite the enemy down with your teeth — so firm is the resolve, so prepared are all to court death. A scramble goes on there among them to lay down life. You will be astonished to learn, the peasants and workers fighting in Vietnam have a squad, which they call 'suicide squad'. They enlist themselves in that squad to lay down their lives. Such suicide squads of ten or twenty people, equipped with bombs and other firearms, enter the enemy camp all on a sudden. There they kill the enemy as many as they can and themselves die. There goes on a scramble to get enlisted in the suicide squad. Their sense of pride or picquance is over who will go ahead of others. One who fails to have the chance of going first has his sentiments churned up : 'You did not send me first, am I any the less ? Am I not capable of sacrificing my life for the country ? Am I incapable of fighting for revolution ? Am I not a son worthy of a peasant family ? Am I a simpleton, a good for nothing who thinks only of his self and evades his task ? I too am the son of a peasant family who considers it the highest honour to lay down his life for liberation movement.' Such is the attitude every peasant and worker of that country betrays. Could this be ever achieved by mercenaries ? Just realize, this is the character of a true volunteer. In this way, you too will have to raise all the people with revolutionary spirit and realization. So, you realize, those who will become volunteers, they don't do so in return for money. Whatever little they will need while they carry out their task, they will collect the same in bits, collect them from thousands — one paise from everyone, a handful of rice from every man — this will do for you. But carry out your task you must. For that you do require volunteers — such volunteers who are imbued with right spirit and realization.

Tasks of volunteers

What will these volunteers do ? They will keep track of the movement of the enemy. Who are the enemy agents entering into the village, which families they are visiting, whom they are trying to confound — the volunteers will gather information about all these. These men of the opponent parties will be trying to undermine the mass movement and the organization — not of course by convincing the masses on politics, but by raking up their base instincts, or by means of muscle power, or by alluring them. The volunteer will keep constant vigil so that these men cannot undermine people's organizations and movements, the volunteers will by all means guard the masses against this evil influence. They will organizedly guard the party meetings. They will seat people at a meeting in a disciplined way. While they will listen to the deliberation of the meeting, they will keep vigil like an eagle on everything around at the same time so that the opponent party or the people of the enemy camp cannot break up the meeting. They will protect the distressed in the villages. They will provide protection to women from those who may try to outrage the women. If wayward youths humiliate the aged or old people, they will sternly take them to task. Again immediately after, they will affectionately, like a friend explain to them where they were wrong. They will explain that this is not proper. Because, these people are aged, they are like fathers. Maybe they did something wrong, or said something unjust. But they are like our fathers. It is our duty to protect their honour, the respect that is due to them. It is a human duty. If we fail in this, we cannot claim ourselves to be humans. Educate them this way. Don't turn them into your enemy. Thus it is a major duty of the volunteers that they will respect women, they will be paying respects to the aged and will protect their honour whenever someone will violate it. First stop them who show disrespect, then try to educate them with an attitude of sympathy. Even after this if they don't pay heed, despise them and take appropriate steps against them.

And it shall be the task of the volunteers that when the masses will take to the battle against the enemy, like army generals they will lead them forward. The volunteers shall learn how to fight the battle, how to advance the combat, when to retreat, and when to encircle the enemy from all sides and overrun them. For this purpose the volunteers are to be trained up. To train them up thus and guide them in a disciplined way, the volunteer corps is to be divided into small groups with a commander heading each group. The commanders are to perform a twin task at once. Firstly they will have to impart practical training to the volunteers, while at the same time in order to imbue them with revolutionary political consciousness and temper them with revolutionary character they will have to impart political education. In this context, the volunteers, too, should bear in mind a very important teaching. The teaching is, for all the party is the highest commander. It is correct, the volunteers will obey what the commander of the group will ask them to do. But, remember, so long as it is the party's assignment, so long as the party holds him as its assigned commander and he obeys the party leadership, he is your leader. But if he turns against the party, if he violates the party discipline or seeks to disobey the party leadership or treats the party leadership with disrespect, then the commander in question should be apprehended immediately and handed over to the leadership. He has to be removed. Your allegiance to the party and to the party's highest leadership should be unquestioning. Remember, without a firm base of discipline no volunteer corps can carry on its task. In the background of the threat that looms before the mass movement today, raising such type of powerful, highly disciplined volunteer corps dedicated to ideology is an essential requisite in the interest of your movements.

Identify the genuine party of the poor

Discussing one more issue I will conclude my discussion today. What should be your guiding outlook to decide which is the genuine party of the poor among the many parties active in our country today — you have to grasp something of it in your own simple way. For, there are many parties who claim themselves as communists, who fly the red banner and talk of Marxism-Leninism. Today in fact there is no scope for going into details of the histories of these pseudo red flag-waving parties, their day-to-day political manoeuvres and practices, their base political lines. About these I have discussed elsewhere in plenty, other leaders of the party have done it too, and our formulated views on these have already come out in print in many organs and booklets. In this discussion today I am going to say a few words concerning only one aspect of the conduct of the leaders and cadres of these parties. I know, not everything will be clear, in fact it cannot be fully clear from what I am going to say in this regard in my discussion here. Still then, a brief discussion on these is necessary.

Firstly, if you look at this Birbhum district and judge for yourselves you can realize who actually did awaken the poor people here — people who were not regarded as humans, even the other day, rather were despised as subhuman creatures, the babus dealing with them with a whip hand.

These so-called Marxist parties in our country existed since long before our party started work and they had been trying as they could to expand their organizational base under the banner of Krishak Sabha and Krishak Samity, and so forth. But none of them had so long tried to awaken the agricultural labourers and poor peasants in the villages by organizing them, nor did they at all try to build a separate class organization of their own. They are not trying it even now. Observe closely and you will find that just like the bourgeois parties, just like the Congress, these sham Marxist parties and socialists rely mainly on the rich farmers and the well-off middle class babus in matters of organization in the rural areas. And with the help of these babus they seek to enlist the rural poor in their respective mass organization and party. It is not difficult at all to realize the real character of these parties — notwithstanding their hollow tall talk about class struggle, Marxism-Leninism and socialism — parties which make no attempt to build the agricultural labourers' and poor peasants' own, separate class organization, parties which instead talk of drawing together, irrespective of class character, the rich and well-to-do peasants and the agricultural labourers, poor and lower-middle peasants in the same organization — and this in a country where, even at a conservative estimate, fiftythree to fiftyfive per cent of the rural people are landless peasants and agricultural laboures, and, with the poor peasants added, the figure comes to around sixtyeight to seventy per cent.

Although, now, some of these parties sometimes talk of building an organization of the agricultural labourers' own — this long after our party, the SUCI built up the Krishak O Khetmajur Federation as a separate class organization of the agricultural labourers' and poor peasants' own — yet in practice these parties continue to organize the rich and well-to-do peasants along with the agricultural labourers and poor peasants in the same organization in the main, that is, in Krishak Sabha, Krishak Samity and so forth. This goes to deny the ever-present class struggle in the rural society between the rich peasants, jotedars and well-off middle peasants, on the one hand, and the agricultural labourers and poor peasants, on the other hand. And, actually, it is recourse to class collaboration in the place of leading the class struggle in the countryside, and this means nothing but sacrificing the interests of the agricultural labourers, poor and lower-middle peasants at the feet of the rich and well-off middle peasants. There are of course reasons for this manoeuvre by these parties. Just study the base political line of these parties and you will realize that this manoeuvre, no matter the rhetorics, is in perfect agreement with their base political line. Because, what they advocate — national democratic revolution or people's democratic revolution — in either case the rich peasants are considered an ally. So, it is easy to understand that the party which considers the rich peasants an ally of revolution in the present situation of our country can never organize genuine class struggles against the rich peasants. On the other hand, ignoring the vast masses of the agricultural labourers, poor and lower-middle peasants in the villages, that is, ignoring the rural proletariat and semi-proletariat, it is not possible for any party to build rural organizations. So, it is the compulsion of reality which forces these parties to talk of the agricultural labourers and poor peasants.

The poor who so long had been trodden down with whip hand, all these parties did not come forward these years to help these poor people rise on their feet with honour, or build their own, separate class organization on the principle of class struggle. At present too they are not making any such attempts. It is the SUCI which for the first time awoke these poor people in the rural areas, helped them stand on their feet with honour, and built their own class organization in this district and in different other districts of West Bengal. All of you present here, know this. In this country it is the SUCI alone which has built the own, separate organization of the landless peasants, agricultural labourers and poor and lower middle peasants on the principle of class struggle against the rich peasants whom we call, in the Marxist-Leninist vocabulary, the rural bourgeois. This is because, the Indian state is a capitalist state. The national bourgeoisie here are saddled in state power. Therefore, without overthrowing the bourgeoisie from the state power, it is not possible to establish here the workers' and peasants' state, emancipation of the exploited masses is not possible either. In my discussion I have also shown why those who are owners of big lands cannot be called today feudal landlords. They are transformed now into the rural bourgeoisie and they represent the ruling bourgeois in the countryside. Without waging ceaseless class struggles against them, revolution cannot be materialized in any way whatsoever. As you know from your own experience, it is primarily against the rich peasants or jotedars that you have to conduct your day-to-day struggles in the village — whether for land, for wage-rise, for the due share of crops, against eviction or against injustice and oppression of so many kinds. And whenever conflict ensues between you and the rich farmers or the well-to-do middle peasants and you have no other way than to organize your resistance movement against their exploitation and the injustice perpetrated by them, the government and the police force are seen to stand by these rich farmers and the well-to-do middle peasants against you. To crush your legitimate movement repression is brought to bear upon you. This in itself goes to demonstrate that the rich farmers and the well-to-do middle peasants are the strong base of the bourgeois class rule and exploitation in the countryside. For this, the police force of the bourgeois government are ever ready to protect their interests. It is thus the rich farmers or jotedars and the well-to-do middle peasants — who go against the struggle of the agricultural labourers and poor peasants and whom you regard as the babu community — they are the class enemy of yours, that is, of the rural proletariat and semi-proletariat in the countryside.

If you find a party, although it claims to be Marxist-Leninist or socialist, building up a peasants' organization in which rich farmers, well-off middle peasants together with the agricultural labourers, poor and lower-middle peasants are its members — then whose organization it becomes in reality ? Whose interests are protected by this organization ? Yours ? Or, the rich peasants' ? In reality, no class struggle is waged by it against the rich farmers and well-off middle peasants who are the main pillars of the organization, lest they turn hostile — only crocodile tears are shed for agricultural labourers, landless peasants and poor peasants and some empty fire-spitting revolutionary slogans are mouthed. Observe carefully, you will find that the peasant organization of each of the parties like the CPI, CPI(M), Socialist Party, has this character. Now that the poor masses are awakening because of the impact of the SUCI, these parties are coming to realize that unless they can hold back the poor people in their fold by any means whatsoever they cannot hope to reap large dividends in their election-oriented politics. Thus, it is out of concern for their politics of electoral dividends that they have donned the cloak of the poor man's friend and are out now to create division among the poor. To hold both the agricultural labourers and poor peasants back in their organizations they are howling against the government only, sparing the rich farmers and well-off middle peasants. In too vague terms they are talking big of revolution. Keep these words in mind, don't ever miss them.

Free the masses from influence of sham red flag-waving parties

All these parties, who are known in India as communist parties or red flag-waving parties, are much older than our party. But decadence has set in in these parties. They are transformed into privileged parties. Just like everything else of the aristocratic families of our society are melting away, except for vain attempts to maintain outward grandeur, and just like they have turned parasites, so also in the sphere of political movements there are some privileged parties. Under various signboards of the red flag-waving party, namely, Communist Party, Communist Party (Marxist), Socialist Party, they carry on activities among the people. The roles these parties play in the communist movement, in the movements of the workers and peasants in our country, are much the same as of the aristocratic families I mentioned. All the utterings and slogans are there alright but for the living soul of revolution and revolutionary ideology. They are revolutionaries in rhetorics and slogans — and for that the trickery of keeping their cadres constantly incited in false militant posture is the only means on which they rely today. Each of them talks of revolution. But we hardly need to spare many words for them. Watch them closely and you will discover that the intellect of these sham revolutionaries is found to be very sharp in the matter of the security and increase of their personal properties. Of course, as is everywhere, there are a few good workers among them too. But as for their leaders and the high-ups among most of their cadres, they are deeply conscious of their personal properties and family interests. They ensure their interests first and then they come out to do good to the people. This is how they deceive the masses. Actually, in the name of revolution, these parties create division among the people and in practice they are seen to be more enthusiastic about opposing the genuine revolutionary party than the class enemy. Unless you can free the poor masses from the influence of these sham revolutionaries, it will not be possible to make gigantic preparations for leading revolution through to success. So it is your onus to expose the real character of these parties before the common people and free them from all confusion.

Remember, this struggle is a great battle. It is no battle of a mercenary army. It is a revolution, staking everything to save the country from deep distress, to free industry, agriculture, the rural life, the decadent urban life, the cultural life of the nation, even science and technical education from the shackles of capitalist oppression, from its vicious cycle of looting profits. Today that great onus of revolution devolves upon the workers and the peasants. Remember, the babus will not achieve this revolution for you. A handful of them may come to you, imbued with the revolutionary ideology, abjuring their class interest and at the most try to arouse you to take on the leadership of the revolution. But this revolution will materialize successfully only that day when revolutionary cadres and leaders in large numbers, who are adequately equipped for the party task, will rise from the families of workers and peasants, and workers and peasants in the towns and villages will get organized into a steel-strong army under their leadership. Till then you will stride on with dream in your eyes for the revolution, you will engage in inconceivable toil to make preparation for the revolution. Till then revolution will not come forth, it will remain a distant cry. When you will all arise and in every village you will develop party workers worthy to be leaders equal to the party task and build powerful party committees, under whose guidance the poor masses in the villages will march like one soldier, one soul and one body, inspired by the political revolutionary ideology and together bound in discipline like an army, and treading the correct revolutionary base political line, no power on earth can resist revolution in India that day with arms, army and armoured tanks. Have trust at least in these words of mine.

I conclude my address here today. To all of you, those who are here as delegates from different districts, who took part in the deliberations, who all listened to me for this long, I extend my greetings. My red salute to you.

Long Live Krishak O Khetmajur Federation !

Long Live S U C I !

Long Live Revolution. !


Notes

1. KKMF, Organization later changed its name to All India Krishak O Khetmazur Sangathan (AIKKMS)

2. A district in West Bengal.

3. Land in excess of ceiling limits and appropriated by big land holders under fictitious titles to help them circumvent legal provisions.

4. Rich peasants owning huge land, the rural bourgeoisie

5. Native landlords required to pay land tax to the former British government.

6. Bigha is a measure of land that equals to one third of an acre, approximately.

7. Refers to the year 1350 of Bengali calendar (1943 AD), when a great famine broke out in Bengal.

8. A crore is ten millions.

9. popular sweet of Bengal.

10. Sugarcane juice, dried.

11. Indira Gandhi, the then Prime Minister.

12. Student organization of the Congress.

13. Youth organization of the Congress.

14. This has reference to the CPI(M)'s Task on the Peasant Front.

15. An Indian land measure, equalling one-twentieth of a bigha.

16. Act which allowed ownership of land to rayats, i.e., peasants who cultivated lands of the zemindars on fixed rents and terms.

17. Block Development Officer, a government official in charge of an administrative block.

18. A native percussion instrument accompanying village festivities and also played before public announcements.

19. A sannyasi is a Hindu monk.

20. This address was given in March, 1970. In January of 1973 US imperialism was compelled to concede the demand for withdrawal of US forces from Vietnam and sign a treaty to the effect.

http://www.marxists.org/archive/shibdas-ghosh/1970/03/29.htm


 

Main Features of the Peasant Movement

[From the Political-Organisational Report of the Sixth Party Congress, 1997.]

1) To summarise, we find that the land question still remains the major question in many areas. However, as the degree of implementation of land reforms differs from one state to another, the general slogan of advancing land reforms also takes different forms in different states.

2) Establishing people's control over common property such as minor irrigation sources (AharPokharTalab etc.), rivers and sandbanks etc. is a major agenda of struggle. Generally, feudals and mafia groups exercise control over them.

3) The questions of wages, equal wages for equal work for men and women, better working conditions, homestead land and pucca houses etc. are more or less common demands of the rural proletariat throughout the country. In the case of land grants it should be demanded that pattas should be issued in the names of both men and women.

4) Issues of corruption in panchayats, in block offices where money intended for relief to the rural poor or for the benefit of small and middle peasants is siphoned off by corrupt officials in league with powerful landlords and kulak groups who also control the political power are very important in popular mobilisation.

5) Tribal questions, whether they are reflected through the Jharkhand movement or in the movements of hill districts and other tribal areas of Assam, or in the girijan movement in Andhra Pradesh etc. are essentially peasant questions, and therefore usurpation of tribal land by usurers/merchants, rights over forest land and forest produce etc., are major questions in these areas.

6) Wherever the movement assumes intensity, private armies of landlords or the goons of the reactionary political parties resort to killing Party leaders and cadres and organise massacres of people. Police atrocities also invariably follow.

7) Anarchist organisations which are degenerating into money-collecting machines are indulging in a killing-spree of our cadres and people, and are using ultra-left rhetoric to the hilt to cover up their dubious links and their dirty mission of disrupting organised mass movements.

The following points merit serious attention:

A. We think that owing to considerable variations in the agrarian situation, a general peasant movement at national level, and therefore a consolidated all-India peasant body, would not have much of relevance. An all-India coordination body to exchange experiences and occasionally issue policy statements and organise seminars, workshops etc. is enough. Even in the states, district or regional level kisan sabha formations may have to play important autonomous roles, as in big states conditions vastly differ from one region to another. Demand-specific and area-specific peasant organisations may also play an important role in mobilising the broad peasantry.

Due attention should be paid to strengthening the organisational functioning of the kisan sabha at district and local levels. In many areas, kisan sabha membership falls much short of our influence among the peasantry and is often even less than the number of people mobilised in our programmes. Live functioning of the village committees holds the key to the vibrancy of the kisan sabha organisation, even amidst severe enemy repression. These committees should regularly convene village general body meetings of the peasant association, discuss the problems of the movement, and membership renewal — and even recruitment — should preferably be done in GBs. The village committees should be strengthened with the perspective of developing them as local organs of people's power. Training local militias and building up of village self-defence squads should be undertaken in a planned manner.

A legal cell to take care of cases and a special team to maintain contact with comrades in jail need to be developed.

Where feasible, women's cells should be formed within the kisan sabha organisations.

Contradictions among people may better be handled by local kisan sabha units instead of the Party directly plunging into them in the first instance. Otherwise there remains no authority to which aggrieved sections can turn to and this results in their alienation. Our experience shows that anarchist groups as well as forces like Ranvir Sena are quite adept in using such contradictions against us. Therefore, contradictions among people must be handled prudently and carefully and through the kisan sabha.

B. The question of agrarian labourers however is increasingly assuming greater importance in the agrarian scene as well as in national politics. The demand for central legislation relating to them is becoming a powerful one. The process of increasing capitalist penetration of whichever variety in agriculture — under the auspices of liberalisation and globalisation — will further push the question of agricultural labourers to the fore.

Moreover, as sections of intermediate castes are also emerging as important power groups, the agrarian movement can only find itself confronting increasingly wide-ranging sections of capitalist farmers and rich peasants. Movements of agrarian labourers, therefore, shall assume important political connotations. To prepare for the future, we shall have to organise a preparatory committee to study the issue in depth and explore the possibility of launching an agrarian labourers organisation.

C. When we get trapped in wars of attrition against private armies, the functioning of peasant associations or movements on peasant issues are left behind. Such a situation is of course forced on us and we can do little to avoid it. But how, then, to continue the functioning of peasant association is a paramount question which we have not been able to solve as yet. We repeatedly tried to use any lull period to activate such movements but no proper mechanism could be developed. Initiatives from state-level peasant association leadership at this juncture may be of crucial importance. And demand-specific organisations may come in handy to tackle such situations.

D. The spate of massacres that we faced in the last few years have raised many questions inside and outside the Party. The most simplistic formulation was provided by anarchists and a section of expert commentators living in the safe world of the media who opined that as CPI(ML) has given up the armed struggle and taken up parliamentary struggle, landlords are taking up the revenge for the 1970s, i.e., for annihilations carried out 25 years ago! This is highly mischievous and subjective thinking at its most absurd.

As Marxists we must understand that the emergence of a new breed of private army and the present spate of massacres are intimately related with the dynamics of present-day politics. If one probes deeper, one can easily see that the intensity of operations of private armies is concentrated mainly in areas where we have thrown up a serious parliamentary challenge to major ruling parties. Sahar and Sandesh assembly constituencies of Bhojpur and Mairwan and Darauli of Siwan are such areas. Even JMM (Mardi)-sponsored MCC killings in Bishungarh and the RJD-sponsored MCC massacre in that part of Chatra which borders Barachetti were shrewd moves to weaken our electoral prospects. As in both these constituencies we present a strong potential threat to JMM (Mardi) and RJD respectively. This is further confirmed by MCC's march to areas of Barachetti just a few days after the Chatra massacre, and its threatening demands that the people leave Maley. This was immediately followed by RJD's campaign in Barachetti asking people to desert CPI(ML). Targeting Bagodar is part of the same gameplan.

After private armies with the active connivance of the administrative machinery are allowed to perpetrate massacres, Laloo Yadav reaches those spots with the compensation packages and calls upon the people not to take up arms and instead take to education etc. It is in this way that the butcher and the priest complement each other. Whatever problems the anarchists may pose to the law and order situation they don't pose any challenge to the political hegemony of the ruling classes. If in 1970s the call for election boycott was the expression of extreme revolutionary advance, in '90s it has degenerated into extreme opportunist betrayal. This is how, dialectically, things transform into their opposites with the change in conditions. The election boycott slogan of anarchist groups has come in handy for shrewd bourgeois politicians. There are innumerable evidences of MCC and PU cadres actively mobilising votes for JD candidates in Bihar elections.

Then again it is totally false to suggest that we have given up the policy of armed resistance. The fact is that the general arming of the masses has today reached a much higher level than at any other time. In hundreds of villages in Bihar the regular exchange of fire has been going on through all these years of parliamentary politics. Thousands of our comrades including entire district committee leaderships have been warranted throughout the state for organising resistance and have to work in almost underground conditions.

In short, it is not our retreat but our advance as a major force challenging the economic, social and political hegemony of the forces of status quo that has led to these sharp attacks against us. It should never be forgotten that political initiatives, movements on popular issues and developing popular resistance are the key elements in taking up the challenge of the combined onslaught of feudal forces and the state. The point is not just to smash this or that sena by some method or other. More important is to raise the political consciousness of people, effect a change in social and political balance of forces and ensure the broadest mobilisation of the people in the process. Otherwise we will be reduced to being just a militant outfit. Yet, as protracted armed conflicts are an inalienable part of peasant movement in Bihar, Party must intensify its state of preparedness. In particular, decisive blows to the enemy are of crucial importance and armed formations must be organised at a higher level to deliver these blows.

 

The Marxist

Volume: 4, No. 2

April – June 1986

  

Fifty Years of Organised Peasant Movement

 

Harkishan Singh Surjeet

 

THE ALL INDIA KISAN SABHA, THE PREMIER ORGANISATION of the Indian peasantry is celebrating its Golden Jubilee this year. It already held the Golden Jubilee Session in the third week of May.

 

Today, the Kisan Sabha is the biggest organisation of the peasantry with 8.4 million members, and if the membership of the All India Agricultural Workers Union is also included, the figure goes up to 9.5 million. Not a day passes without some struggle or movement being conducted somewhere in India. In many areas of the country the Kisan Sabha symbolises the aspirations and hopes of the multitude of poor and the collective will of the peasantry. The organisation is growing everywhere, and more and more peasants are joining it and taking part in its activities and struggle.

 

Fifty years ago, when it was founded in a Conference in Lucknow, the AIKS was a small organisation, and very few people heard about its formation. During these intervening years many heroic battles have been fought and won. The battles which were lost, also left their imprint on the organisation. Thus a great deal of blood has been shed, and many martyrs have given their lives fighting for the democratic rights of the peasants. Many comrades have sacrificed the better part of their youth in the underground or prison.

 

The entire history of the past fifty years has been a long history of severe repression against the organisation and its workers. But none of the sacrifices have gone waste. Each ounce of blood, energy and time given has strengthened the body and the soul of the organisation. The Kisan Sabha which we see today, with its large membership and an elaborate network of units reaching down to the village level, is a product of this history. It was founded to play a distinct role in the history of the country. For an assessment of the role played by the organised peasant movement in the last fifty years under the leadership of the Communists, it is essential to understand the actions of the peasantry, first under the feudal leadership and the later under the leadership of the bourgeoisie, and the class limitations imposed on the peasant movements by these leadership.

 

PEASANT STRUGGES IN NINETEENTH CENTURY

Though the AIKS was formally established on April 13, 1936, it had not been built in a day. The peasant movements in different parts of the country had existed for the past century. Many of the peasant struggles fought in those days were spontaneous in character, lacked proper direction and in many cases were badly organised. Still they played a role in raising the consciousness of the peasantry to fight against oppression and in defence of their rights.

 

The first half of the nineteenth century witnessed uninterrupted anti-colonial activity on the part of the peasantry, and tribesmen led by feudal lords who had lost their privileges. The feudal lords in the Northern Sarkars had been strongly resisting British domination ever since the beginning of the nineteenth century. In 1807 the whole Delhi regime took up arms; in 1814 at Tuppan of Muneer (near Varanasi). Rajput peasants secured the abolition of the sale of land by public auction of a large village community to a stranger. In 1817 the peasants of Orissa led by local feudal lords, rose up in protest against the introduction of taxation of their rent free service lands. Poona district witnessed the uprising of the peasantry from 1826 to 1829 when the authorities were obliged to cede to them holding subject to low revenue charges. In 1830-31 British troops were sent to suppress a peasant uprising in Bedsore district of Mysore State against the tax increase. In 1835-37 there was an uprising in Gumsur in Madras Presidency. In 1842 an uprising flared up in Sagar. In 1846-47 the peasants in Karnal rose up in revolt. In 1848 Rohillas in Nagpur took up arms. In 1844 in the Kolhapur and Santavadi State bordering Bombay Presidency, there was a large-scale revolt in protest against the British decisions increasing the land revenue to pay the princes' tribute. The peasants of Khandeth in Bombay Presidency rose up in protest against the land settlement which resulted in the increase of land tax.

 

There were also innumerable uprisings of tribals in this period – of the Bhils in 1818-1831 and Kolis in 1824 in Bombay Presidency, unrest in Kutch in 1815 and 1832 and revolt in Kittur in 1824-1829. In 1820, there was an uprising of the Mers in Rajputana, and of the Hos tribe in Chote Nagpur in 1831-32.

 

In 1846 the Khonds rose up in Orissa and 1855 witnessed the Santhal revolt in Bihar.

 

There was also unrest in the Indian towns usually resulting from the introduction of new taxes, which generally took the form of hartals.

 

These heroic struggles culminated in the First War of Independence of 1857, when the leadership of the movement was taken up by Sepys. Explaining the significance of theis rebellion Karl Marx wrote:

 

"Before this there had been mutinies in the Indian Army, but the present revolt is distinguished by characteristic and fatal features. It is the first time that Sepoy regiments have murdered their European Officers: that Mussulmans and Hindus, renouncing their mutual antipathies, have combined against their common master; that disturbances beginnings with the Hindus, have actually ended in placing on the throne of Delhi a Mohammedan Emperor', That the mutiny has not been confined to a few localities and lastly, that the revolt in the Anglo-Indian army has coincided with a general disaffection exhibited against English supremacy on the part of the great Asiatic nations, the revolt of the Bengal army being, beyond doubt, intimately connected with the Persian and Chinese wars."

 

The uprisings were confined to northern and central India. The peasants after driving out the local representative of the colonial administration set up armed detachments for their own defence and defended the village communal lands, which had been expropriated by the British conquerors. The population in the town played an active par in the uprising. They not only liberated a number of large cities like Aligarh, Bareilly, Lucknow, Kanpur and Allahabad but set up a government in each of them.

 

This popular uprising of 1857-59 was defeated for various reasons the most important being that although the fighting forces had consisted of peasants and artisans, they were led by the feudal nobility, who showed themselves incapable of leading the national liberation struggle. They could not evolve a united strategy and a united command. The centres of uprising which emerged spontaneously, acted independently of each other. Moreover, the feudal lords did not take any measure to alleviate the lot of the peasantry. When the British Government made concessions to the feudal lords, they dissociated themselves from the uprising. The Sepoy commanders were not able to wage a complex war.

 

After the British succeeded in suppressing the uprising, they had to learn a lesion and change their tactics. The East India Company was liquidated and India became a colony of the British government. They also made a lot of concessions to the feudal lords thereby winning their sympathy and support. In spite of all this the uprisings left their imprint on the national liberation struggle, which developed in subsequent years.

 

Then followed the period of intensified exploitation of the country. This exploitation of India as a source of cheap raw materials as well s a commodity market for British manufactures constituted the main form of colonial loot. It helped to promote the development of commodity-money relations in both the towns and villages, and this growth of simple commodity production in a period of formation helped in the further penetration of trading and usury capital into the spheres of agriculture and handicrafts.

 

BOURGEOIS LEADERSHIP TAKES OVER

Discontentment among the people, especially the peasantry, was rapidly growing; the defeat of Czarism by Japan gave encouragement to the feelings national liberation; and the Russian Revolution of 1905 also made its own impact on the country. The immediate issue which galvanised the atmosphere, was the partition of Bengal which aroused universal indignation throughout the land, leading to the movement for boycott of foreign goods which began on August 7, 1905. Simultaneously, the Punjab was witnessing great unrest among the peasantry on the question of the Colonisation Act. A powerful movement developed against it, led by Lajpat Rai, Ajit Sigh and Banke Dayal.

 

These movements in which the peasantry participated in large numbers, were accompanied by trade union struggles in Bombay Calcutta and other places. The revolutionaries who at this time took to the path of armed struggles against imperialism helped radicalise the politics of those days. To meet the situation the British rulers resorted to repressive measures; heavy sentences, deportation banning of meetings, detention without trial, etc. But this did not deter the people from their path. The Government had to announce a review of the partition of Bengal and withdrew the Punjab Colonisation Act. These developments and their outcome signified that a new class had come onto the scene, i.e., the bourgeoisie. It was providing leadership to the movement and was able to get concessions.

 

The outbreak of the imperialist world war in 1914 raised hopes among the people for the liberation of all colonial peoples and Indian revolutionaries abroad, who were mostly peasants, took the initiative to organise a revolt in the Indian Army. They formed the Gadhar Party with headquarters in San Francisco. They raised the slogan of complete independence and sent hundreds of revolutionaries to India to organise a revolt against the British. Many of them were caught and hanged, large numbers had to undergo life imprisonment, and face tortures and deprivation. Although they did not succeed in their mission their impact in arousing the peasantry during the war period should not be underestimated. An overwhelming majority of them later on joined the Kisan sabha when it was formed.

 

By contrast with the activities and goal of these revolutionaries, the Indian National Congress for its part had expressed its loyalty to the imperialist war in all its sessions held in this period. Even on 1918 at the close of the war at its session in Delhi the Congress Party passed a resolution expressing loyalty to the King and conveying its congratulations at the successful termination of the war.

 

POST-WAR UPSURGE AND THE IMPACT

OF THE RUSSIAN REVOLUTION             

By December 1917 news of October Revolution in Russia was beginning to filter through to India and the not-too-efficient censorship allowed it to appear in the Press. Many articles appeared and demobilised soldiers returning from the fronts also brought the news. It had a tremendous impact on the Indian people, who welcomed the success of the Russian Revolution with understandable enthusiasm in particular, its slogan of the right to self-determination of a nation. At the Calcutta Session of the Congress in December 1917, Annie Besant spoke of the Russian Revolutions as one of the factors that fundamentally changed the previously existing situation in India.

 

As the war neared its end, having cost almost ten million lives, the Indian soldiers began returning home, by sea, on foot, through the endless expanses of the Himalayan passes, covered with blinding white snow. But these were no longer the timid downtrodden peasants and craftsmen who had cowered before the arrogant Englishman, or a conceited zamindar. They had forgotten the smell of freshly turned earth; their hands were no longer accustomed to the plough. Instead they brought with them the smell of fire bayonet, and slash with a sabre. They had acquired a sense of their own worth and dignity and came to believe in their own strength. In their native villages and hamlets they found their holdings ruined or falling into decay, and the land, which had once been fruitful, dried and barren. Clenching their teeth in anger they listened to heart-rending stories, broken by sobs, of the death from hunger of their children, wives and aged parents. They had come to understand that their trouble was caused by the greed and cruelty of the colonialists and landlords. It was no by chance that India was in the throes of an unprecedented upsurge in the post-war period.

                          

Lenin had taken note of the situation. Addressing the Second Congress of the Communist Organisations of the East on November 22, 1919, he stated:

 

"In this respect you are confronted with a task which has not previously confronted Communists of the world; relying upon the general theory and practice of Communism, you must adapt yourself to specific conditions such as do not exist in European countries, you must be able to apply that theory and practice to conditions in which the bulk of the population are peasants and in which the task is to wage a struggle against medieval survivals and not against capitalism..." (emphasis added)

 

On February 17, 1920, the Indian Revolutionary Associations headed by émigrés like Raja Mohinder Pratap, Maulana Mohammed Barkatullah and Maulana Obeidullah Sindhi, in an Assembly held in Kabul, adopted the following resolution addressed to Lenin.

 

"Indian revolutionaries express their deep gratitude and their admiration of the great struggle carried on by Soviet Russia for the liberation of all oppressed classes and peoples, and especially for the liberation of India. Great thanks to Soviet Russia for her having heard the cries of agony from the 315,000,000 people suffering under the yoke of imperialism. This mass meeting accepts with joy the hand of friendship and help extended to oppressed India."

 

In reply to this message Lenin wrote:

 

"I am glad to hear that the principles of self-determination and the liberation of oppressed nations from exploitation by foreign and native capitalists, proclaimed by the workers' and Peasants' Republic, have met with such a ready response among progressive Indians, who are waging a heroic fight for freedom. The working masses of Russia following with unflagging attention the awakening of the Indian workers and peasants. The organisations and discipline of the working people and their perseverance and solidarity with the working people of the world are an earnest of ultimate success. We welcome the close alliance of Muslim and non-Muslim elements. We sincerely want to see this alliance extended to all the toilers of the East. Only when the Indian, Chinese, Korean, Japanese, Persian and Turkish workers and peasants join hands and march together in the common cause of liberation – only then will decisive victory over the exploiters be ensured. Long lives a free Asia." (Collected Works, Vol. 31, p. 138)

 

PEASANTRY IN ACTION FOR NATIONAL LIBERATION

Lenin's prediction proved to be true. The peasantry in India was drawn into action in a big way. With the starting of the non-cooperation movement the peasantry in various parts of the country became very active. Though not strictly a part of the non-cooperation movement, at the same time, their activities cannot be separated from the movement for national liberation. Peasant struggles became linked up with the struggle for independence since it was the imperialist system of exploitation, which was the main protector of the feudal exploitation in the countryside.

 

In northern India the Gurudwara Reforms Movement, which started with the Nankana Massacre, brought the vast Sikh peasant masses into action against British rule, thus making it a part of the liberation movement. In UP had begun the Eka Movement of tenants who were fighting against the extortions and oppression of the landlords. In the south there was the Moplah Rebellion in Malabar (Kerala) an uprising tenants against the oppression of jenmies (landlord).

 

The main slogan of the Gurudwara Reforms Movement was the liberation of Gurudwaras from the control of Mahants who had the patronage of the British imperialists. Bringing the Sikh peasantry into the national mainstream, it soon took the form of an anti-imperialist movement. The Eka Movement was also widespread and militant. It raised the demands of fixed rents, receipts for payments, stoppage of beggar for the landlord, free use of water from ponds, and the freedom to graze cattle in the jungles. It was a revolt of the tenants against the unbearable oppression of the landlord.

 

The Moplah rebellion, again essentially an uprising of the tenants in Malabar, began on August 20 1921. The tenants were Muslims while the jenmies were Hindus. The main targets of the attack of the rebellion were the police, military, landlords and moneylenders. The police and military suppressed the rebellion with brutal violence in which 3,266 Moplahs were killed.

 

The period also witnessed big working class actions- in the textile and jute Mills in Calcutta, Bombay, Madras; in the North Western and Eastern Railway, the coal-fields of Jharia, the P & T Department of Bombay; plantations of Assam; tramways of Calcutta, etc.

 

C.I. NOTES DEVELOPMENT

The Fourth Congress of the communist International took note of the situation and drew attention to mobilising the peasantry in the struggle for independence. The Congress emphasised that "the revolutionary movement in the colonial countries would achieve no success unless it gets the support of the peasant masses. The agrarian programme of the Communist in the counties of the East demands the complete elimination of feudalism and all its survivals and aims at drawing in the peasant masses in the struggle for national liberation."

 

The thesis on the Eastern question adopted at the Congress stated that the Communists must see to it that the national revolutionary parties adopt a radical agrarian programme.

 

Dealing with the agrarian question and describing the situation of the peasantry in the colonial countries the Congress came to the conclusion that

"Only the agrarian revolution aiming at the expropriation of large land owners can rouse the vast peasant masses destined to have a decisive influence in the struggle against imperialism. The fear of agrarian watchwords on the part of the bourgeois nationalists (India, Persia and Egypt) is evidence of the close ties existing between the native bourgeoisie and the large feudal and feudal bourgeois landowners and their ideological political dependence on the latter. The hesitation and wavering of this class must be used by the revolutionary elements for systematic criticism and exposure of the lack of resolution of the bourgeois leaders of the national movement. It is precisely this lack of resolutions that hinders the organisations of the toiling masses as is proved by the bankruptcy of the tactics of non-cooperation in India.

 

"The revolutionary movement in the backward countries of the East cannot be successful unless it is based on the action of the masses of the peasantry. For the reason the revolutionary parties in all Eastern countries must define their agrarian programme which should demand the complete abolition of feudalism and its survivals, expressed in the forms of large landownership and farming.

 

"In order that the peasant masses may be drawn into active participation in the struggle for national liberation, it is necessary to proclaim the radical reform of the bourgeois nationalist parties to the greatest extent, possible to adopt this revolutionary agrarian programme." (Documents of the History of the C.I. vol. Pp. 550).

 

CHAURI CHAURA INCIDENT:

BETRAYAL BY BOURGEOIS LEADERSHIP

When in 1922 Mahatma Gandhi launched a mass civil disobedience movement in one district of Bardoli, it gave encouragement to the people in the rest of the country. A few days later in a little village. Chauri Chaura in UP angry peasants stoned and burnt the village police station, and the unpopular village constabulary was burnt in the flames. This unrest of the peasantry crucial to the Indian Revolution was not to the liking of Mahatma Gandhi. He lost no time in announcing the withdrawal of the movement, disappointing even congress leaders who were then in prison. The reality of the situation was that the reformist control of the movement was weakening.

 

This concern was reflected in the message telegraphed by the Viceroy to London on February 9, only three days before the withdrawal of the movement:

 

"The lower classes in the towns have been seriously affected by the non-cooperation movement…. In certain areas the peasantry have been affected, particularly in parts of the Assam Valley, United Provinces, Bihar Orissa and Bengal. As regards the Punjab, the Akali agitation…. has penetrated to the rural Sikhs. A large proportion of the Mohammedan population throughout the country are embittered and sullen… grave possibilities. The government of India are prepared for disorder of more formidable nature than has in the past occurred and do not seek to minimise in any way the fact the great anxiety is caused by the situation."

 

The resolution adopted by congress Working Committed on the withdrawal of the movement, on February 12, 1922, makes clear as daylight that Mahatma Gandhi and the Congress leadership were afraid of the agrarian revolution and opposed to it. They were not interested in drawing in the working class and peasantry as classes, into the movement. After deploring the activities of the peasants of Chauri Chuara as inhuman, the working committee resolution instructed the local congress committee "to advise the cultivators to pay land revenue and other taxes due to the government and to suspend every other activity of an offensive character."

 

In order that there should be no ambiguity on this question, it further stated.

 

"The working committee advices congress workers and organisations to inform the ryots (peasants) that withholding of rent payment to the zamindars (landlords) is contrary to the Congress Resolutions and injurious to the best interests of the country."

 

The resolution then ended by coming out in open defence of the landlords as against the peasants:

 

"The working committee assures the Zamindars that the Congress movement is in no way intended to attack their legal rights, and that even where the ryots have grievances, the Committee desires that redress be sought by mutual consultation and arbitration."

 

It is clear from the above resolution that the question here was not one of violence or non-violence. It was instead a clear question of defence of the class interests of the landlords-the exploiters against the exploited. Gandhi and the dominant leadership of the Congress called off the movement because it was beginning to threaten those propertied class interests with which they themselves were closely linked.

 

Thus the class limitations of the bourgeois stood revealed: though it wanted the peasantry to be drawn into the national liberation struggle, did not want the peasantry to come into action as a class. And thus began the struggle between the two approaches, the approaches of the working class, which had by now emerged on the scene, and that of the bourgeoisie.

 

WORKING CLASS

LEADERSHIP

By contrast March 1923, the Executive Committee of the Communist Internation issued a manifesto on the Chauri Chaura sentences where 172 peasants had been given death sentences, asking for protest meetings and a movement for their release.

 

The peasantry had already had the experience of betrayal by the landlords during the struggles of the 19th century. In the Chauri Chaura struggle they were able to se the betrayal by the bourgeoisie. The Communists and the Left in the Congress learnt from the experience of these two betrayals by the two classes, who were considered their natural leaders, and decided to organise the peasantry independently, as a class, though working in cooperation with other anti-imperialist classes and strata including the bourgeoisie.

In May 1923, the formation of the Labour and Kisan Party was announced and its action programme for the peasants included protection against eviction, 20 per cent reduction on all economic rent in ryotwari settlement areas, eventual abolition of Permanent settlement abolition of beggar, protection against oppression of zamindars, abolition of salami, free irrigation, abolition of dowry, etc. loans in seed or money without interest, etc.

 

This was the beginning of the preparations for a platform of action for the peasantry. Subsequently, peasant organisations also came into existence in various places. A Note of Satya Bakta, Secretary, Indian Communist Party dated June 18, 1925, states:

 

"In order to organise the Indian peasants, labourers and other working people and with a view to bettering their condition, the Indian Communist Party resolves to adopt the following programme:

 

"In these days there are several kisan sabhas (peasants' unions) in UP and other provinces. They are striving after some reforms. But as long as landlordism exists in India, peasants cannot become happy and prosperous. That they should pay something to the Government is after all acceptable. But there is no reason why middlemen or commission agents should be allowed to exist. But until the victory of the proletarian class, landlordism cannot be abolished entirely.

 

"Even now the government and leaders of our country, if they really desire the betterment of the peasants can improve the present conditions to a great extent. In our opinion peasants should be entitled to pay their rent direct to the Government who may pay to the landlord their share. They should not be allowed to have any other connection with or control over the peasants. In this way while landlords will loss nothing of their legitimate income, they and especially their servants will no longer be able to rob peasants in the shape of unlawful taxes and gratuities. For this purpose the Indian Communist Party will agitate among the peasants and will urge upon all new and old kisan sabhas to work in the suggested manner."

 

It is clear from this that kisan sabhas had already come into existence in many parts of the country. Subsequently the Labour Swaraj Party was formed in Bengal, on November 1, 1925. It was called the Labour Swaraj Party of the Indian National Congress. Its programme for the peasantry stated:

 

Land taxes to be reduced to a fixed maximum and fixity of the interest rate of the Imperial Bank on arrears of rents; fixity of tenure, no ejection cessation of illegal and extra taxation, right of transference, right of felling trees, sinking wells, excavating tanks and erecting pucca structure; fixed term of fishery rights in jolkars; fixity of maximum rate of interest to be levied by moneylenders; agricultural cooperative banks to be established to provide credit to the peasants and to free them from the clutches of moneylenders and speculating traders; agricultural machinery to be sold or lent to the cultivators on easy terms through the cooperative banks.

 

This organisation was a forerunner of the Workers and Peasants Party. On February 6-7, 1926 the Second Session of the All Bengal Kisan Conference was held in Krishna Nagar (Nadia District). It decided to organise a peasants and Workers Party called the Bengal Peasants and Workers Party. While the basic demand mentioned that the ultimate ownership of land would vest in a self-contained autonomous village community, it put forward the following immediate demands:

 

1)                Fixity of rates in relation to the rents payable by the tenants: the interest charged    on arrears of rent to be equal to the rate of interest charged by the Imperial Bank.

2)                Cultivator's undivided ownership be recognised on the land he tills.

3)                Permanency of tenure in land (which the cultivator tills), banning of evictions.

4)                Stopping of all unjust and illegal cesses.

5)                Right freely to transfer the land to another without payment of salami.

6)                Right to cut the trees, to dig wells and cut canals and build a house on his land without paying any salami.

7)                Fixing conditions for catching fish in the ponds on the land.

8)                The highest rate of interest to be charged by the mahajan to be fixed at a rate not more than 12 per cent.

9)                Establishing cooperative agricultural banks to give credit to the peasant and thus to release him from the grip of the greedy and professional moneylender.

10)            Machinery needed for cultivation etc. to be sold outright to the peasant or to be given to him on rent for use, and the price of the same or the rent amount thereof to be recovered from peasant in easy instalments.

11)            To make arrangement for the wholesale sale of jute or other commercial crops so that a just profits rate is guaranteed to the peasant.

 

It was on February 24, 1927 that the Workers And Peasants Party was formed in Bombay. It resolved that "a political party of workers and peasant be established to voice the demands of these classes within the National Congress, to promote the organisation of trade unions to wrest them from their alien control, to advance the organisation of peasants on the basis of their economic and social requirements and to present a determined and pertinent opposition to the government and thus secure the social, economic and political emancipation of these classes."

 

In formulating the economic demands it proposed:

12)            The abolition of indirect taxation and the introduction of graded income tax on all income exceeding Rs 250 per mensem.

13)            Nationalisation of land wherein all cultivable land will be leased by Government to cultivator.

14)            Nationalisation of means of production, distribution and exchange. 

15)             Rent of land holding not to be excessive.

16)            Establishment by the government of State-aided cooperative banks controlled by local organisations for the provision of credit to peasants, at a rate of interest not exceeding seven per cent.

 

In a programme formulated for the All India Congress Committee it proposed:

 

"70 per cent of the population which is engaged in agriculture is to be organised into peasant societies, by district, taluk, and village, on the lines of the village panchayat, based on universal suffrage aiming to secure control of the economic life of the rural areas. Through the agricultural cooperative banks to be established by the State for the provision of cheap credit to the peasants, whereby they will be enabled to free themselves from the grip of Saukars, and to purchase modern machinery and other equipment; limitation by law of the rate of interest at seven per cent per annum; limitation of rent to 10 per cent of the total produce to be paid direct to the Sate, and brining into cultivation by State aid cultivable land by present unused.

 

But the bourgeoisie leadership of the Congress was not prepared to take up the peasant demands.

 

When a proposal was mooted before the Subjects committee of the Congress that it should side with peasants and workers when a conflict arose between them and the zamindars and capitalists. Pandit Motilal Nehru, the then President of the Congress, contended in reply, that the Congress was not the Socialist or Communist Party. The reason for making this statement was that the Congress was by no means ready to stand up for those who produce all things by their labour.

 

J M Sengupta, leader of the Bengal Swarajists, made this even clearer. He said that the party includes many zamindars and that without their help so many men of their party would certainly never be able to enter the Councils. So they could by no means help the peasants, going against those zamindars. They tried to cover this defence of the interest of the landlords under the pretext that no class struggle existed in the countryside, and the congress represented the whole country.

 

It is not accidental that certain juridical measures of reforms in tenancy rights were introduced in India not at the initiative of the bourgeoisie, but by imperialism often in the face of nationalist bourgeois opposition.

 

POPULARISATION OF

THE AGRARIAN PROGRAMME

The formation of the All India Workers and Peasants Party and the subsequent historic Meerut Trial, helped in popularising the agrarian programme among the Indian masses. The Meerut Trial went on for more than four years. The persons involved in the trial in their statements advocated the programme of the Communists in relation to the working class, peasantry and other toiling sections of the Indian population, along with their unflinching opposition to imperialist rule in the country.

 

This was the period when the economic crisis of the 30s had engulfed the world. India was the worst hit during this crisis and in 1931 the Central Banking Enquiry Committee registered the general conviction that

 

"Indebtedness leads ultimately to the transfer of land holdings from the agricultural class to the non-agricultural money-lenders leading to the creation of the landless proletariat with a reduced economic status. The result is said to be loss of agricultural efficiency as the moneylenders sub-let at a rate which leaves the cultivators with a reduced incentive." (Enquiry Committee Report. P. 59)

 

The 1931 Census report reached the conclusion that

     

"It is likely that a concentration of the land in the hands of the non-cultivating owners is taking place." (Census of India, 1931, Vol. 1)

 

Similarly, the extent of the collapse in prices of agricultural commodities was such, that whereas in 1928-29 the value of agricultural crops, taken at an average harvest price, was about Rs 1034 crore, in 1933-34 it was only Rs 473 crore a fall of 55 per cent.

 

In the United Provinces, the number of tenants abandoning their land because they could not pay rent, reached as high as 71 440 in 1931. The burden of debt doubled. Peasants were groaning under their heavy indebtedness, their lands were passing into the hands of moneylenders and they were being forced to live the life of paupers.

 

The peasant organisations emerging in various States now had a clear-cut programme not only for immediate relief but also directed against the system of landlordism. The peasants had realised the necessity of organising themselves as a class which was numerically not only strong but also the worst exploited under the triple attack of the imperialists landlords and moneylenders and traders. The Indian National Congress was desirous of mobilising them in the struggle for independence since without them it was not possible to bring pressure to bear on the imperialists but it did not want the peasantry to emerge as a class conscious of its rights and determined to put an end to the rule of the landlords.

 

The Congress started the Civil Disobedience movement but its 11-point charter of demar ds did not contain any demands of the working class and peasantry against the capitalists and the landlords.

 

The resolution of the Karachi Session of the Congress where fundamental rights were mentioned in relation to the peasant demands it did not stipulate more than a substantial reduction of land revenue and rent, and total exemption only for the necessary period in the case of uneconomic holdings. There was no reference to abolition of landlordism or even the annulment of at least a portion of the rural debt. It was clear that that Indian National congress did not want to rouse the peasantry against feudal oppression.

 

Gandhi's hopes for a compromise were shattered at the Round Table Conference and he had again to continue the movement, which lasted up to 1934, drawing into its fold huge masses. Once again the movement was withdrawn without achieving its aim, and Gandhi withdrew from the Congress exercising his influence from outside.

 

FORMATION OF

ALL INDIA KISAN SABHA

The Communist Party was banned in 1934 but continued to exercise its influence on the working class and on the Left in the Congress. The ideas of Socialism wee becoming very popular, and left dements in the Congress, becoming disillusioned with Gandhi formed the Congress Socialist Party, in order to give the Congress a Left orientation. Coming to realise that the vast masses of the peasantry could be brought into the struggle for independence only by taking up the anti-feudal struggle and their immediate demands they were also realising the necessity of organisation the peasantry as a class. They had already come to the conclusion that the struggle for real political freedom could not be separated from the struggle of the peasantry for an end to landlordism and for radical restructuring of rural society. The Communists were already trying to develop class organisations and had popularised the ideas of independent class organisations of the working class peasants and other sections of the toiling people. Thus it was the Left Congressmen, Congress Socialists and Communists who took the initiative in organising the All India Kisan Sabha.

 

The First Session was held in 1936, Lucknow to coincide with the holding of the Session of the Indian National congress. The idea was to project the kisan movement as a part of the national movement though maintaining its separate identity as a class organisation.

 

BROAD BASED

ORGANISATION

The following list of the names of some of the participants in the first All India Kisan Sabha Session is revealing : EMS Namboodiripad, Dinkar Methta, Kamal Sarkar, Sohan Singh Josh, Lal Bahadur Shastri, K D Malaviya, Mohan Lal Gautam, B Sampooranand, Jayaprakash Narain, Swami Sahajanand, NabaKrishna Choudhury, Harekrishna Mahtab, N G ranga, Indulal Yajnik, R K Khadilkar, Bishnuram Medhi and Sarat Sinha. Many of them became prominent national and state-level personalities in subsequent years. It also suggests how broad-based the Kisan Sabha was from the very beginning and how it tried to attack people of varying political views to join together in defence of the democratic rights of the kisans.

 

The formation of the AIKS was preceded by a meeting in Meerut in January 1936, where the necessary preparations were made. A clear decision was taken to launch the organisation with a broad-based programme and membership to link it closely with the national movement for independence and to view the fight against imperialism as an integral part of the fight against the feudal social order since the former patronised and provided state support to the latter.

 

Today with the benefit of hindsight one is struck by the simplicity and directness with which the very first session set out its tasks in the main resolution. To quote:

 

"The objective of the Kisan movement is to secure compete freedom from economic exploitation and the achievement of full economic and political power for the peasants and workers and all the other exploited classes.

 

"The main task of the kisan movement shall-be the organisation of peasants to fight for their immediate political and economic demands in order to prepare them for their emancipation from every from of exploitation.

 

"The kisan movement stands for the achievements of ultimate economic and political power for the producing masses through its active participation in the national struggle for winning complete independence."

 

It their indicted the zamindari system, "supported by the British government in India", as "iniquitous unjust, burdensome, and oppressive to the kisans", and declared that "all such system of landlordism shall be abolished and all the rights over such lands be vested in the cultivators."

This was the essence of what the kisan movement stood for at the time of the launching of the AIKS. The other issues covered by resolutions included questions of rent, irrigation rates and prices of inputs, prices of marketed agricultural products, indebtedness, forced labour and illegal exactions from the tenants by the landlords and the distribution of landlords land to the landless poor peasants as also the vesting of waste land and grazing land in the village level panchayats. The AIKS also demanded minimum wages for the regulating their unionisation.

 

Any one reading those resolutions will immediately notice that many of the issues raised by the conference of the AIKS in its first session have remained unresolved till today.

 

PART OF THE

NATIONAL MOVEMENT

The Bombay session of the Central Kisan Sabha Council (CKC) held in August 1936 further elaborated many of the points raised in the founding session. It categorically stated that, since the kisans constituted more than four-fifths of the population, "no political or economic programme which has the audacity to ignore their needs and demands can by any stretch of imagination, be labelled as a national programme", and called upon the Indian National Congress to make "the solution of the problems of the peasantry the chief plank of its political and economic policy." At the same time the CKC felt the need for a political movement, which draws "its main strength and inspiration from the peasantry."

 

These two struggles --- the kisan movement and the national movement were seen as "inter-dependent, the strength of the one adding to the other."

 

The CKC meeting also strongly emphasised on the need for peasant unity. The AIKS was an "expression of the awakening of the peasantry", and should represent not only the ryots the tenants and the landless labourers but also all sections of cultivating peasantry --- "in other words, it represents, and speaks and fights for those who live by cultivation of the soil. All these different strata among the kisans will have to combine and fight for removal of all the letters imposed by British imperialism and it's allies the landlords."

 

FUNDAMENTAL AND

MINIMUM DEMANDS

The Bombay Session made a separate listing of "fundamental demands" and "minimum demands". The former included the demands for abolishing intermediary tenures, replacement of existing land revenues by graduated land tax, cancellation of old debts and allocation of land to landless and poor peasants for cooperative farming.

 

The minimum demands included the cancellation of the rent and revenue arrears; exemption of uneconomic holdings from land revenue; reduction of rent revenue and water rates by half; immediate grant of right permanent cultivation to tenants cultivating land held by zamindars, talukdars, etc., rent remission for these tenants; graduated taxation of agricultural income abolition and penalisation of all feudal and customary dues, forced labour and illegal exactions; a five year moratorium on debts freedom from arrest and  imprisonment for debtors and also immunity from attachment for small holdings; licensing for money-lenders; arrangement of credit from the state cooperative and land mortgage banks over a long period of 40 years t five per cent interest lowering the freight on agriculture goods introduction of one paise postcards; abolition of indirect taxes on salt kerosene sugar, tobacco molasses, etc., stabilisation of agricultural prices minimum wages legislation to recognise collective action of the peasants insurance for cattle fire and health adult franchise and establishment of village panchayats for managing civic affairs and communal land among others.

 

These show the wide range of issues covered by the AIKS in its campaign which catered to the needs and aspirations of various sections of the peasantry.

 

From its very beginning the AIKS was alert and reacted to major national and international events. While striving for the country's independence the AIKS had a distinct concept of independence, which was outlined in various resolution where along with political independence, socio economic independence was emphasised. To quote from the resolution of the Bombay CKC meeting in 1936 again it stated:

 

"The Kisan must fight for national socio-economic independence Indian a democratic of Britain must be transformed into a free progressive democratic India of the masses."

 

There was no room for exploitation and oppression in the concept of the free Indian that the AIKS held. It was never solely concerned with narrow peasant issues and defined the interests of the peasantry in broad terms.

          

FOR WORKERS

PEASANT ALLIANCE

One of the cornerstones of its policies had always been the unity of the peasants with the workers. In its Gaya Session in 1939 the AIKS talked about the objective of building "a democratic State of the Indian people leading ultimately to the realisation of Kisan --- Mazdoor Raj". Even earlier in its second session at Faizpur the Presodential Address stated:

 

"It is the sacred duty of every of our kisans to fraternise with the workers in the village and in the town…  There is much to be achieved by both workers and peasants by common effort for their mutual benefit."

 

The adoption of the red flag with hammer and sickle, signifying the unity of these two classes, was strongly defended by the General Secretary Swami Sahajananda at the Comilla Session in 1938 on the grounds aspirations of the exploited and the oppressed."

 

Its commitment to anti-imperialism was reflected in the resolutions passed in the earlier years condemning the Italian attack on Ethiopia and the Japanese attack on China, and supporting World War began it doggedly opposed the war efforts championed the cause of world peace and later when the fascist forces of Hitler attacked the USSR it firmly came out with the slogan of defeating the fascist hordes to save humanity from fascist enslavement. It mobilised popular opinion against fascism.

 

On national issues too, the AIKS conferences not only passed resolutions against the colonial rulers but also fought for a determined struggle against British rule and State organised oppression. In fact, many of the leaders of the AIKS were themselves the stalwarts in the national movement and spent many years in British prisons.

 

AGAINST

HEAVY ODDS

The formation of the AIKS was greeted with hostility from many sides. Both the Hindu and Muslim vested interests joined hands against the AIKS and tried their best to disrupt the working of the organisation by terrorising the peasants and using communal propaganda. The British government alarmed by its growing hold on the peasantry intensified its repression by arresting key leaders, from time to time and forcing many others to go underground. A report of the intelligence Bureau of the British colonial government in India said in 1937:

 

"The Communist leaders are developing a strangle hold upon any future agrarian movement as well as inspiring this with their special methods and outlook of which by no means the least is the belief in mass violence and the violent overthrow of British rule."

 

The right wing of the Congress party led by Sardar Ballavbhai Patel and Dr Rajendra Prasad fought against the collective affiliation of the Kisan Sabha to the Indian National Congress and strongly opposed the separate existence of the kisan organisation had produced such an atmosphere of violence in the countryside that an explosion may occur at any moment."

 

In many provinces the Congress leaders took an openly pro-landlord view and used their power in governments formed in the late thirties to suppress the agitation of the peasants. In Bihar they made an alliance with the landlord lobby to fight off AIKS activists.

 

In its formative years therefore the AIKS had to grow fighting against such heavy odds. But it grew nevertheless. The very formation of the organisations inspired peasants all over the country to take up immediate issues and light. As opposed to the path taken by the Indian National Congress, which compromised with landlords and other vested interests, and spoke of non-violent resistance, the AIKS rallied the peasants to stand up to the attacks by the armed thugs of the landlords and the police. The Gaya Session of the AIKS in 1939 reported that "the past year has witnessed a phenomenal awakening and growth of the organised strength of the kisans in India.

 

FORMATION OF

MINISTRIES

To keep the mass movement under control, congress decided to implement the Constitution of 1935 and formed the ministries. Congress policy was again put to the test and again it was found that it stood by the side of the landlords against the tenant and the landless. But the organised peasant movement supported by the Congress Left was proving capable of exercising influence, and the Congress Ministries were being forced to give some concessions.

 

However, the Congress never defined the meaning and importance of national freedom other than as freedom from British rule. It was the Communists, Socialists and the Congress Left, which were trying to propagate the understanding that freedom from foreign rule could have real meaning only if it was followed by agrarian revolution and completion of the bourgeois democratic tasks.

 

The masses were getting disillusioned and impatient, and wanted the Congress leadership to launch a final assault on British rule. The leadership wanted to restrain them and use them for pressure and bargaining. The peasant movement thus came again into conflict with the bourgeois leadership of the Congress, especially on the issue of struggle against feudal and semi-feudal relations. The limitations of the bourgeois leadership were starkly revealed and it could be clearly seen that it did not want to come into conflict with the landlord class.

 

The leadership was prepared to accept and support certain demands of the peasantry, which were directed against the Government, but was not prepared to take up the basic issue of abolition of landlordism. In fact it was afraid of agrarian revolution. Therefore, the kisan sabhas, while supporting the struggle for national independence had not only to strengthen the independent class organisations of the peasantry but also to forge unity with the working class, the most revolutionary class for our society for completion of the agrarian revolution.

 

KISAN SABHA

AND THE WAR

As compared to the Indian National Congress, which lent its support to the war efforts of British imperialism the AIKS came out in firm opposition to the war. Here again there were two different class approaches-one supporting the British imperialist power the other expressing its firm opposition to imperialist war being fought with the sole purpose of redividing the world for the continuation of colonial exploitation.

     

The AIKS gave a call for struggle against British rule and their Indian lackeys, and launched a no rent, no tax movement. The AIKS was naturally subjected to unprecedented police repression and its open functioning became extremely difficult. Its officers in Bengal and other States were raided and put under lock and key, and its main functionaries were either arrested or forced to go underground.

 

However, with the attack on the Soviet Union by the German Fascists in June 1914 the Sabha raised the slogan of defeating fascism to save humanity from fascist enslavement. It took the view that on the victory over fascism depended the survival of the first Socialist State as well as the independence of countries including ours. The AIKS therefore considered it the sacred duty of the organisation to support the cause of defence of Socialist State and defeat of fascism.

 

While the task of fighting fascism was given the priority it deserved the AIKS in its Session in 1914 reminded its members that  "the struggle for India's freedom should not be slackened even temporarily." The CKC meeting at Nagpur in 1942 demanded transfer of power to a national Government and a declaration recognising India's right to freedom. It identified the British colonial regime, which was working "in complete isolation from the millions on the land" as the greatest obstacle to the mobilisation of India's millions in the defence of their country and the successful persecution of the war."

 

When on August 9, 1942 Gandhi and other leaders of the Congress were arrested leading to violent protests in many parts of the country, the AIKS expressed its full support to the Congress demand for transfer of power, demanded the released of Gandhi and other national leaders, and condemned the "indiscriminate firing and repression that have been let loose by the Government on the people."

 

POST-WAR

UPSURGE                                                          

The military defeat of the fascist powers headed by Hitlerite Germany and the decisive role played by the Soviet Union altered the alignment of class forces on a world arena in favour of Socialism. This also resulted in the general weakening of imperialism on a world scale. Inspired by this powerful national liberation struggle swept throughout the countries of Asia.

 

India the largest country of the British Empire witnessed a mass revolutionary upheaval against British rule-peasant revolts of which the heroic armed struggle of the Telengana peasantry was the most important general strikes of workers, student strikes and the states people mass struggle developed on an unprecedented scale. The demonstrations for the release of INA personnel took the form of a country – wide revolt against British rule. This wave of protest reached a climax with the uprising of the Royal Indian Navy in February 1946 in Bombay, Karachi and Madras. The Union Jack was removed from the ship's masts and the Congress and Muslim League flags hoisted instead. In Bombay the naval ratings carried the Red Flag of the Communist Party along with the other two. The slogans the navy men raised showed the political nature of the action-Jai Hind, Inquilab Zindabad, Hindu-Muslim Unity. Release INA and other political prisoners. Down with British Imperialism, Accept our demands.

 

Rajani Palme Dutt, in his outstanding and seminal work, India Today, not only captured the spirit of the time, but gave a keen analytical insight into the significance of the event and the class reactions it engendered:

 

"The Naval rising and popular struggle in the February days in Bombay revealed with inescapable clearness the alignment of forces in the explosive situation developing in India in the beginning of 1946. It showed on the one hand the height of the movement the courage and determination of the people and the overwhelming mass support for Hindu-Muslims unity and Congress-League unity. It showed that the movement had reached to the armed forces and that therefore the basis of British rule was no longer secure. But it showed on the other hand the unreadiness and disunity of the existing national leadership and their consequent inability to lead the national struggle.

 

"But now when the masses were really in movement when Hindu-Muslim unity was being realised and practised when the armed forces had united with the civilian population in the common national movement and when the real struggle for freedom had opened the gates of British rule, the attitude of the upper leadership of the national movement revealed a marked change. The upper class leadership of the Congress and Muslim league found themselves in opposition to the mass movement and aligned with British imperialism as the representative of law and order against the people. A whole series of statements and denunciations were issued condemning the "violence" not of the imperialist authorities whose firing slaughtered hundreds in three days but of the unarmed people who had been the objects of military firing Vallabhai Patel issued a statement in which he declared that the Naval ratings ought not to have taken to arms and that he endorsed remarks of the Commander-in-Chief that there ought to be discipline in the Navy" (India Today. P. 583)

 

The RIN uprising however was followed by militant struggles in the countryside at the head of which, at the many places stood the Communist Party. And by 1946 the AIKS through militant struggles in Punjab, UP, Bihar, Kerala, Maharashtra and Andhra had drawn the attention of all on the question of abolition of landlordism. The slogan of agrarian revolutions was brought onto the agenda in the armed resistance of the peasants of Vayalar and Punnapra in the State of Travancore, the militant Tebhaga struggle of the peasants of Bengal the struggle of the Warli peasants in Maharashtra and the struggle of the Tripura peasants.

 

Crowning all these struggles was the epochal struggle of the peasantry of Telengana, which has no parallel in the history of the country where peasants fought with arms in hands from 1946-1951 for three years, 1948-51 against the armies of the Indian State.

 

In the course of the movement guerrilla squads were formed from the village to the district level, which met the terror unleashed by theRazakars, and in many instances scared away the landlords in the area. At the peak of the struggle almost 3000 villages, with roughly 30 lakh of the people and an area of 16,000 square miles were liberated and brought under the administration of Gram Raj. In this area guerrilla squads of 2000 and a people's militia of 10,000 guarded the villages and about10 lakh acres of land were distributed among the landless. Among the reforms introduced by the revolutionary leadership was the slashing of usurious interests banning of forced labour and fixation of a minimum wage. This was the real alternative developing to bourgeois landlord rule in the countryside and its significance lay in the fact that if it had been allowed to develop a qualitative change would have come about in the situation combining agrarian revolution with the national liberation movement and the course of history would have been entirely different.

 

BOURGEOIS PARTIES SETTLE

WITH IMPERIALISTS

Telengana showed the direction the mass movement could have taken if it had not been checked. The completion of the tasks of the bourgeois democratic revolution had come onto the political agenda with the agrarian revolution as its crux. But though the 'workers and peasants' alliance was being forged and the Communist Party was at the head of some of these struggle it was not in a position to assume the leadership of the national movement, which still remained in the hands of bourgeoisie.

 

Afraid of this mass upsurge the bourgeoisie realised that if the struggle against imperialism developed into a general revolt the leadership of the mass movement would slip away from is hands. British imperialism also saw that it would no longer be possible to continue their rule. Under these circumstances the leaders of the National Congress and the Muslim League reached a settlement with the British imperialists.

 

With the outmoded agrarian relations not being radically changed and a path of capitalist development in compromise with imperialism and feudalism being pursued by the ruling Congress party, it was but natural that the tasks of the bourgeois democratic revolution remained incomplete.

 

Had the bourgeoisie not compromised at this stage, the situation would have gone out of its control. It would have lost its leadership and the working class would have been in a position to lead the movement and complete the tasks of the bourgeois democratic revolution. By now our country would have also taken the road to Socialism as has been done by China, Vietnam, North Korea and other Asian countries.

 

EXISTENCE OF CASTE AND

COMMUNAL PROBLEM

The existence of the communal and caste problems and threat of divisive forces with which we are faced today also originates from the policies pursued by the Congress party in the pre-in-dependent and post-independent period-its policy of alliance with feudalism instead liquidating it and the weakness of the organised peasant movement in leading the agrarian revolution in alliance with the working class the position which it started acquiring during the post-war period but was not able to bring to a decisive turning point.

 

Historical experience shows that it is only in countries where feudal and semi feudal relations have been put an end to and the agrarian revolution has been led to successful completion that the problem of caste or communalism can be overcome. It is only in the countries where the national liberation struggle was led by bourgeoisie but was not led to its completion that this problem not only remains but gets aggravated to be used by the ruling classes to divert the discontent of the masses and to disrupt the unity of the democratic movement. Experience has also shown that in the areas where the peasant movement was strong in spite of efforts made by the British imperialists riots could not be organised and the unity forged during the struggle between the Hindu-Muslim peasants stood as the guarantee of communal peace. The Kisan Sabha never allowed any scope for communalism and casteism on its platform. It not only maintained its secular character but exposed the communal ideology and fought against this virus during the riots in Punjab, Bihar and Bengal. In pursuing this policy some of its leaders and cadre laid down their lives fighting against the dark forces of communalism.

               

Thus, though the leadership of the national liberation movement was in the hands of the bourgeoisie, alternative political forces represented by the trade unions and kisan and other militant organisations had started emerging as a powerful force at the end of the war to offer a real challenge to the bourgeoisie. This became clear with the results of the first general election in free India. Wherever there had been strong peasant organisations, the combination of Left and other Opposition forces won a magnificent victory, becoming the main opposition in Parliament, the recognised Opposition in four State Assemblies-West Bengal, Hyderabad, Madras and Travancore-Cochin. The struggle for an alternative leadership continues to this day.

CONGRESS

AGRARIAN POLICIES

In the post-independent period the bourgeoisie continued its alliance with the landlords and the balance sheet of bourgeois agrarian policy is explained in the Programme of the CPI(M), in para 34.

 

"In no field is the utter failure of the bourgeois-landlord government's policies so nakedly revealed as in the case of the agrarian question. Nearly two decades of Congress rule has proved beyond any shadow of doubt that the aim and direction of its agrarian policies is not to smash the feudal and semi-feudal fetters on our land relations, and thus liberate the peasantry from age-old bondage, but to transform the feudal landlords into capitalist landlords and develop a stratum of rich peasants. They want to depend upon the landlord and rich peasant section to produce the surplus of agricultural products to meet the requirements of capitalist development. They also want to make these sections the main political base of the ruling class in the countryside."

 

Although these measures did not bring the desired resulted of making the tiller of the soil the owner of the land it made certain changes in the agrarian relations. Under the impact of the agrarian movement intermediary tenures like zaminidaris, jagirs, imams, etc., which prevailed over quite a large area of the country were abolished in the early 50s and more than 20 million tenants were brought into direct relation with the State. It was these occupancy tenants who directly benefited from the land reforms to become owners of the land they tilled. These rich and middle peasants were no longer interested in radical land reforms.        

 

This has been shown by the subsequent developments also.

 

The overall result has been that even after four decades of independence the pro-landlord, anti-peasant policies of the Government have resulted in the further deepening of the agrarian crisis, which manifests itself in growing landlessness increase in disparities both inter-regional and inter-sectional in the same region, an extremely low level of consumption of food-grains despite increasing production and bourgeoning stocks held by the Government growing poverty and unemployment despite all the poverty alleviation schemes and growing indebtedness which finds partial reflection in the growth of overdues in institutional credit supplied to the agricultural sector and so on.

 

In spite of two rounds of Land Ceiling legislations in the 1950s and 1970s only 7.2 million acres have been declared surplus out of which 5.6 million acres have been taken over and 4.4 million acres actually distributed. This is about seven per cent of the surplus estimated i.e., 63 million acres by the Mahalanobis Committee after the first round of ceiling laws were enacted and one fifth of the surplus estimated on the basis of date made available by the NSS 26th Round.

 

Even if we take into consideration the 1981 Agricultural Census land concentration continues. As compared to three per cent land holders holding 10 acres and above and operating a total of 26 per cent of the land in 1976-77 in 1981-82, 2.4 per cent of land holders held 22.8 per cent of the land. It is also estimated by the Planning Commission that even now if a 20-acre ceiling is imposed and all loopholes in ceiling laws plugged about 23 million acres of land can be made available for distribution. But the Seventh Plan makes no mention of amending the ceiling laws nor about breaking the land monopoly. And typically the Central Government took more than five years to give Presidential assent to the West Bengal Land Reforms Legislation, which seeks only to plug certain loopholes.

 

PEASANT MOVEMENT

AFTER INDEPENDENCE

In the first six years of the post independence period the peasant movement again had to face severe repression at the hands of the Government Afraid of the tempo of the growing revolutionary movement, it unleashed repression making the functioning of various units impossible. The All India Kisan Sabha was not able to hold any session till April 1953. But in spite   of this the Kisan Sabha was busy organising the resistance of the peasantry especially on the question of evictions, and militant fights were put up in many States. Subsequently various Congress Government were forced to take measures of land reforms such as ceiling legislations security of tenure and rent reduction, consolidation of holdings, etc., but all failed to fulfil the declared objectives. On the other hand the period witnessed a large-scale eviction offensive throwing millions of tenants into the ranks of agricultural workers.

 

In the late fifties the Kisan Sabha fought many struggles on the issues of land fair prices for peasants produce, debt relief, in defence of the rights of tribal people and on the issue of the burden of heavy taxation. The most important of these struggles was the heroic struggle of the Punjab peasantry against the imposition of the betterment levy tax in the beginning of 1959. This was the most important struggle fought under the flag of the Kisan Sabha after the epoch-making Telengana struggle. The peasants defied firings lathi-charges, beating and all types of repression. The all in peasant unity forged during the struggle was unparalleled, when peasant united irrespective of their political affiliations. The movement ultimately forced the Government to withdraw the tax amounting to Rs. 136 crore.

 

The agrarian crisis further aggravated in the 60s. By the mid-1960 stagnation in agriculture and the consequent food crisis worsened. The bourgeois-landlord classes began losing their hold over the mass of the peasantry with the result that in the 1967 elections the Congress monopoly of power was broken in eight States with West Bengal and Kerala giving victory to the Left and democratic force among which the CPI(M) played an important role. Powerful peasant struggle took place in different States on different issues. In Kerala and West Bengal these struggles were most widespread and became intimately connected with political issues.

 

The United Front Government of West Bengal and Kerala made a big impact on the masses, not only in those States but also in the rest of the country. When the Central Government dismissed these governments hundreds of thousands of peasants actually joined the struggle for democracy in West Bengal combining this with the struggle for defending heir land and crops.

 

Mid-term elections gave a bigger victory to the United Front in West Bengal and the peasant movement attained wider sweep. Millions of peasants all over the State unleashed an unprecedented struggle with the backing of the United Front Government, for recovering benami land for possession and distribution of surplus lands, for loans in kind and for checking hoarding and black-marketing. In this period more than three lakh acres of land were located taken over and distributed among the landless through village level committees. Many peasants lost their lives in the battles fought on this issue, but it gave a big impetus to the kisan movement and the AIKS spread to all districts.

 

These struggles achieved important gains and helped in raising the political consciousness of the peasantry. It was because of this that the Kisan Sabha was able to face the semi-fascist terror of 1917 to 1977, fight back the repression and defend their interests though working in semi-legal conditions.

 

In Kerala, the peasants conducted a statewide movement for agrarian legislation and debt relief legislation for the rights on Government lands against threat of central intervention. As a result of the campaign one lakhs pattas were distributed to erstwhile-unauthorised occupants of the land. The ceiling was revised downwards and made family-based many exemptions were withdrawn and hutment dwellers were given rights on land on which they lived. Tens of thousands of agricultural labourers conducted powerful and successful struggle for better wages and living conditions.

 

The discontent found powerful expression in other parts of Indian also. In Maharashtra, Andhra Pradesh, Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, Assam, Tripura, etc., widespread struggles took place for occupation of forest or government lands and against eviction from these lands. In Punjab and UP widespread agitations took place on the question of sugarcane prices. Struggle took place against increased taxation on the question of food and relief rent reduction and against unjust levies. Militant struggles of agricultural labourers took place in Tamil Nadu and Andhra Pradesh.

 

This period also witnessed two splits in the AIKS one from the Right and other from the Left. While they did a lot of harm to the Kisan Sabha, it not only survived these attacks but advanced further. At the same time it also failed to properly understand the changes in the agrarian structure and work out the appropriate tasks on that basis. By 1978-79 it was able to give a new orientation to its policy, which led to its big advance. Membership of the Kisan Sabha, which had never gone beyond ten lakhs till 1968-69 after 1978-79 jumped by millions and now stands at 84 lakhs.

 

PRESENT PHASE

OF STRUGGLE

In this connection the question may be asked why has the bourgeoisie not been able to implement radical land reforms when the latter would serve its objective interests? The breaking of the feudal and semi-feudal relations would naturally lead to the expansion of the internal market, which would be helpful for expanding industries. The answer lies in the fact that in spite of the objective interests of the bourgeoisie, the latter dies not want the forces of agrarian revolution to be unleashed which, in unity with the working class would pose a threat to its class rule. It was from this angle that it forged an alliance with the landlords and now tries to solve its contradiction through pressure and bargaining. All conflicts and contradictions, which arise between the landlords and the bourgeoisie whether on the question of remunerative prices for agricultural produce cheep agricultural inputs and machinery or on the question of taxation the push and pull between the two remains but the alliance continues.

 

It is in this context that the Kisan pursues its alternative line, the line of completing the agrarian revolution, in unity with the working class, and continues to lead the mass struggle of the peasantry in this direction. Since independence the situation has changed. Although land monopoly remains a lot of changes have taken place in the agrarian structure, which require a changed approach in building peasant unity and in leading the agrarian revolution to success.

 

Land to the tiller and total abolition of landlordism have been the basic slogans of the Kisan Sabha since its inception. What bearing do the changes in agrarian sector have on these basic slogans? Before examining these changes, let me state here at the outset that the seizure and distribution of the land of the landlords still remains the central slogan for the kisan sabha to propagate among the peasantry and other democratic classes. Without the victory of this slogan there cannot be any solution to rural poverty unemployment, a fast development of a balanced economy in the country and so on.

 

But the correlation of class forces, which existed at the time when the Kisan Sabha inscribed these basic aims in its programme are not the same as exist today. It is necessary for us to understand his change since it has great relevance to the chalking out of our immediate slogans and actions.

 

The land reforms which the Congress Government set about to introduce after independence were not directed to end landlordism and give land to the tiller though this was the pledge the Congress had made to the peasantry during the freedom struggle. These land reforms had only very limited objectives, the main one of which was to reform, not abolish the old type of feudal landlordism by converting the absentee feudal landlords into capitalist landlords personally supervising cultivation in large farms with farms servants and hired agricultural workers. This is the new type of landlord who combines in himself elements of both feudalism and capitalism.

 

Another objective was to create a stratum of rich peasants. These two sections were to constitute the political base of the ruling party in the rural areas. They were also to produce the surplus food grains necessary for the Government to feed the urban people as well as to produce the raw materials for industry. With thousands of crores of rupees from the public exchequer pumped into agriculture these sections have been helped to adopt modern methods of farming.

 

Here, we should warn against one tendency. Earlier there was a tendency to altogether ignore the penetration of capitalism into agriculture. Now a reverse tendency is raising its head, which considers that feudal landlordism, and other semi-feudal relations have almost totally been abolished. This is wrong. The extent of capitalism in agriculture varies from State to State and even from region to region inside a State. Here a concrete study of the situation in each area is necessary.

 

We have also the note the phenomenon of the monetisation of the entire agrarian economy. Today, it is not only those who have a surplus who are taking their produce to the market, even the poor peasant immediately after the harvest for various reasons, sells his produce in the market and later buys even his food grains requirement from the market. It is only if this phenomenon is properly understood can we mount a struggle against the big traders and monopolists.

 

Even after the abolition of statutory landlordism like zamindari, jagirdari, etc. concentration of land in the hands of big landlords has not been appreciably reduced. Even today 2.5 per cent of top landlords posses 22.8 per cent of the land. The real concentration would be even more if benami transactions are included.   

 

Congress land reforms have also resulted in the eviction of millions of tenants who have either joined the ranks of landless agricultural labourers or become tenants-at-will without any rights or protection. Only a section of the earlier tenants could by a portion of the land on which they were working either by paying compensation in instalments or outright purchase at lowers than market rates.

 

So, after the Congress land reforms the situation we find in the rural area is that three per cent of big owners have in their possession about one third of the cultivated land.

 

Another ten per cent consists of rich peasants owning roughly five to ten acres of wet, or ten to twenty acres of dry land, who contribute manual labour and employ a considerable number of farm servants and agricultural workers.

 

Another 15 per cent consists of middle peasants owning two to five acres of wet, or ten to twelve acres of dry land. They and their families work on the land but also hire labour in busy seasons.

 

Twenty per cent of the rural households are poor peasants possessing one or two acres of wet, or two to five acres of dry land. Apart from working on their own land, they have to frequently hire themselves out to earn a living.

 

The last 50 per cent are those who own no land at all, earns their livelihood mainly by hiring themselves out as wage workers or are engaged in handicrafts, villages' services, etc.

 

Of course, it has to be borne in mind that this categorisation will pay from State to State and region to region.

 

What has to be noted is that unlike in the pre-Independence days, 25 per cent of peasants, rich and middle peasants are not moved any longer by the slogan of seizure of landlords land and its distribution. At the other end of the scale the 70m per cent of landless and poor peasants are not conscious and organised enough to go into action today for the seizure of landlords lands; even when they are moved into action, it is only for Government waste land, cultivable forest land etc. Regarding even surplus land above the ceiling which the landlords are keeping illegally, the struggle as in Kerala or recently in Andhra Pradesh, could not advance beyond the stage of locating such surplus land and exposing the Government's claims. Only under the United Front Government in West Bengal in 1969, could some of the surplus land be occupied. This we will have to take into consideration when we work out our immediate tasks.

 

But what we have to note is that the Congress Party, which ruled the country for thirty-five years, while failing to end landlordism, land concentration and growing landlessness has successfully disrupted the pre-independence peasant unity. It is true that unity cantered around the rich and middle peasants, which today we are striving to build peasant unity cantering around the agricultural workers and poor peasants. The ruling class party, whether congress or Janata, also used its control peasantry and the disruption of their unity. The two-year of the cooperatives rural banks etc., to perpetuate the division in the peasantry and the disruption of their unity. The two years of the Janata Party government showed that its policies in regard to land reforms were no different from those of the Congress. In fact, some of the Janata State Governments were proposing to reverse even the Congress legislation to favour the landlords.

 

Taking note of these structural changes and their multifarious consequences we have to come to the conclusions that the slogan of complete abolition of landlordism and distribution of land of the landless and land-poor continues to be the central slogan of the agrarian revolution a slogan which we have to continue to propagate. But it is a slogan on which we cannot go into action today in most parts of the country.

 

While continuing to propagate this as the central slogans, while continuing struggles for surplus land, benami lands, waste land etc. the kisan sabha will have to take up for immediate action such issues as the question of wages of agricultural workers, house sites, rent-reduction, 75 per cent of the produce to the sharecroppers evictions, abolition or scaling down of rural indebtedness, remunerative price for agricultural produce, cheap credit, reduction of burdens and heavy levies like water charges, electricity rates, etc., landlord-goonda attacks with the connivance or direct help from the police the social oppression of harijans, corruption in administration etc,. These are issues which affect all sections of the peasantry-poor, middle, rich, and they can all be drawn into the movement on them. All these currents have to be brought together to build the maximum unity of the peasantry cantering around the agricultural workers and poor peasants to isolate the small stratum of landlords.

 

All this will, course depend on how successfully we organise the agricultural workers and poor peasants and bring them into action not only on their own specific demands but also on the general demands of the peasantry as a whole, and how far we are able to draw other sections of the peasantry into movements on issues affecting them, and on the general demands of the peasantry. There is no doubt that the middle and rich peasants can be drawn into movement on such issues. It is our task to see that while other sections of the peasantry support the agricultural workers in their struggles, the latter in turn extend support to movements on the demands of the peasantry, thus paving the way for building peasant unity.

 

Our earlier analyses of the agrarian policies of the Congress Governments have shown them to be anti-peasants, serving the interests of the landlords and the bourgeoisie. As compared to that the Left Front Government of West Bengal and Tripura, and the Left Democratic government of Kerala (for a brief period) with the limit power they enjoy under the constitution, backed by the organised peasant movement, have tried to alleviate the conditions of the peasantry. In West Bengal, land has been distributed to 12 lakh families 13 lakh sharecroppers have been registered and more than two lakh of them receive credit from banks in a year, more than two lakhs have been given rights over homesteads, minimum wages fro agricultural workers are regularly revised. Small farmers have been exempted from land revenue and debt relief has been given.

 

In Tripura more than one-lakh beneficiaries have been given land, debt relief has been given to poor peasants and artisans, while minimum wages have been fixed and sharecroppers recorded. In Kerala under the Left Democratic Front Government holdings under four acres were exempted from plantation tax, rent arrears for holdings up to 2.5 acres cancelled and subsidies given on inputs and exemptions on gifted land taken away.

 

This would not have been possible without the strength of the peasant organisation because without the active intervention of the Kisan Sabha, the bureaucracy would never have allowed the implementation of measures, which would have remained on paper as pious declarations. It is because of these alternative policies that the Kisan Sabha has grown so strong in West Bengal with almost 33 per cent of the adult peasant population including agricultural workers joining the organisation.

 

In other states also the kisan sabha has grown through struggles. Kisan Sabha units in different States have taken up different issues depending on the concrete situation in each state. In Bihar the question of eviction of sharecroppers has remained very acute and struggle fought over it; in some, states against rise in taxation and on remunerative prices in most of the states. The first half of 80s witnessed a tremendous upsurge among the peasantry where even the Congress base was drawn into struggles. This shows the tremendous possibilities for building the peasants movement.

 

GLORIOUS HISTORY

OF 50 YEARS

The Kisan sabha has grown into a powerful organisation with 84 lakh members today and if we include agricultural workers the membership surpasses 95 lakh. The 50 years' record of the All India Kisan Sabha is a record of glorious history. It played an important role in arousing the peasantry in the movement for national freedom. The All India Kisan Sabha was able to unite various sections of the toiling peasantry in the struggle against feudalism, big traders and monopolists. In its long history of 50 years it has had to face severe repression. Even after independence the bourgeois-landlord Government launched severe repression against it but the movement not only survived, it grew in influence and strength. It has emerged as a premier organisation of the peasantry.

But it should not be forgotten that the peasts organised in the AIKS and other peasant organisations under their influence are only a very small percentage of the peasant population in the country. Vast areas in our country especially in the Hindi-speaking region are untouched by the activities of the organised kisan movement. It is imperative that this grave weakness is over come as quickly as possible.

          

The Golden Jubilee Year of the AIKS should become the starting point of the biggest activity to expand the Kisan Sabha to all the areas, to spread the message of the agrarian revolution in even part of the country. The Kisan Sabha's aim should be to see that there is no revenue circle in the country without an AIKS unit. Seventy per cent of our population lives in the rural areas and is engaged in agriculture handicrafts and other rural trades. Without organising the bulk of them neither their genuine interests can be defended nor can there be any successful agrarian revolution. The guarantee of the success is a powerful Kisan Sabha as the mass organisation of the peasantry championing also the cause of agricultural workers and forging unity with them and building the unity of the peasantry with the working class. Let the Golden Jubilee Year see the beginning of the efforts to fulfil this historic task.

 

The Golden Jubilee of the AIKS comes at a time when the national situation is bleak and the international situation is menacing because of the imperialist threat of nuclear war. Only by strengthening the organisation manifold as speedily as possible can the AIKS mobilise the peasantry to intervene in the national situation and strengthen the struggle for peace against the imperialist warmongers.


Naxalite

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Map showing the districts where the Naxalite movement is active (2007)

The word NaxalNaxalite or Naksalvadi is a generic term used to refer to various militantCommunist groups operating in different parts of India under different organizational envelopes. In the eastern states of the mainland India (BiharWest Bengal and Orissa), they are usually known as, or refer to themselves as Maoists while in southern states like Andra Pradesh they are known under other titles. They have been declared as a terrorist organization under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act of India (1967).[1][2][3]

The term 'Naxal' derives from the name of the village Naxalbari in the state of West BengalIndia, where the movement had its origin. The Naxals are considered far-left radical communists, supportive of Maoist political sentiment and ideology. Their origin can be traced to the split in 1967 of the Communist Party of India (Marxist), leading to the formation of the Communist Party of India (Marxist–Leninist). Initially the movement had its centre in West Bengal. In later years, it spread into less developed areas of rural central and eastern India, such as ChhattisgarhOrissa andAndhra Pradesh through the activities of underground groups like the Communist Party of India (Maoist).[4]

As of 2009, Naxalites were active across approximately 180 districts in ten states of India[5]accounting for about 40% of India's geographical area,[6] They are especially concentrated in an area known as the "Red corridor", where they control 92,000 square kilometers.[6] According to India's intelligence agency, the Research and Analysis Wing, 20,000 armed cadre Naxalites were operating in addition to 50,000 regular cadres[7] and their growing influence prompted Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh to declare them to be the most serious internal threat to India's national security.[8]

In February 2009, the Indian Central government announced its plans for broad, co-ordinated operations in all affected states (Chhattisgarh,OrissaAndhra PradeshMaharashtraJharkhandBiharUttar Pradesh, and West Bengal), to plug all possible escape routes of Naxalites.[9]

Contents

 [hide]

[edit]History

The term Naxalites comes from Naxalbari, a small village in West Bengal, where a section of the Communist Party of India (Marxist) (CPM) led by Charu MajumdarKanu Sanyal and Jangal Santhal initiated a violent uprising in 1967. On May 18, 1967, the Siliguri Kishan Sabha, of which Jangal was the president, declared their readiness to adopt armed struggle to redistribute land to the landless.[10] The following week, a sharecropper near Naxalbari village was attacked by the landlord's men over a land dispute. On May 24, when a police team arrived to arrest the peasant leaders, it was ambushed by a group of tribals led by Jangal Santhal, and a police inspector was killed in a hail of arrows. This event encouraged many Santhal tribals and other poor people to join the movement and to start attacking local landlords.[11]

Charu Majumdar, inspired by the doctrines of Mao Zedong, provided ideological leadership for the Naxalbari movement, advocating that Indian peasants and lower class tribals overthrow the government and upper classes by force. A large number of urban elites were also attracted to the ideology, which spread through Majumdar's writings, particularly the 'Historic Eight Documents' which formed the basis of Naxalite ideology.[12] In 1967, Naxalites organized the All India Coordination Committee of Communist Revolutionaries (AICCCR), and later broke away from CPM. Violent uprisings were organized in several parts of the country. In 1969, the AICCCR gave birth to the Communist Party of India (Marxist-Leninist) (CPI(ML)).

Practically all Naxalite groups trace their origin to the CPI(ML). A separate offshoot from the beginning was the Maoist Communist Centre, which evolved out of the Dakshin Desh group. The MCC later fused with the People's War Group to form the Communist Party of India (Maoist). A third offshoot was that of the Andhra revolutionary communists, mainly represented by the UCCRI(ML), following the mass linelegacy of T. Nagi Reddy, which broke with the AICCCR at an early stage.

During the 1970s, the movement was fragmented into disputing factions. By 1980, it was estimated that around 30 Naxalite groups were active, with a combined membership of 30,000.[13] A 2004 Indian Home Ministry estimate puts numbers at that time as "9,300 hardcore underground cadre… [holding] around 6,500 regular weapons beside a large number of unlicensed country-made arms".[14] According to Judith Vidal-Hall (2006), "More recent figures put the strength of the movement at 15,000, and claim the guerrillas control an estimated one fifth of India's forests, as well as being active in 160 of the country's 604 administrative districts."[15] India's Research and Analysis Wing, believed in 2006 that 20,000 Naxals were involved in the growing insurgency.[7]

Today, some Naxalite groups have become legal organisations participating in parliamentary elections, such as the Communist Party of India (Marxist-Leninist) Liberation. Others, such as the Communist Party of India (Maoist) and the Communist Party of India (Marxist-Leninist) Janashakti, are engaged in armed guerrilla struggles.

On 6 April, 2010 Naxalites launched the biggest assault in the history of the Naxalite movement by killing 76 security personnel. The attack was launched by up to 1,000 Naxalites[16][17] in a well-planned attack, killing an estimated 76 CRPF policemen in two separate ambushes and wounding 50 others, in the jungles of Chattisgarh's Dantewada district. On 17th May, Naxals blew up a bus on Dantewda-sukhma road in Chhattisgarh, killing 15 policemen and 20 civilians. In third Major attack by Naxals on 29th June, at least 26 personnels of Indian Centre Reserve Forces (CRPF) were killed in Narayanpur district of Chhattisgarh.

[edit]Violence in Bengal

The Naxalites gained a strong presence among the radical sections of the student movement in Calcutta.[18] Students left school to join the Naxalites. Majumdar, to entice more students into his organisation, declared that revolutionary warfare was to take place not only in the rural areas as before, but everywhere and spontaneously. Thus Majumdar declared an "annihilation line", a dictum that Naxalites should assassinate individual "class enemies" such as landlords, businessmen, university teachers, police officers, politicians* of both Right and Left) and others.[citation needed]

Throughout Calcutta, schools were shut down. Naxalites took over Jadavpur University and used the machine shop facilities to make pipe guns to attack the police. Their headquarters became Presidency College, Kolkata[citation needed]. The Naxalites found supporters among some of the educated elite, and Delhi's prestigious St. Stephen's College, alma mater of many contemporary Indian leaders and thinkers, became a hotbed of Naxalite activities.

The Chief Minister, Siddhartha Shankar Ray of the Congress Party, instituted strong counter-measures against the Naxalites. The West Bengal police fought back to stop the Naxalites. The house of Somen Mitra, the Congress MLA of Sealdah, was turned into a torture chamber where Naxal students from Presidency College and CU were incarcerated illegally by Police and the Congress cadres. CPI-M cadres were also involved in the "State terror". After suffering losses and facing the public rejection of Majumdar's "annihilation line", the Naxalites alleged human rights violations by the West Bengal police, who responded that the state was effectively fighting a civil war and that democratic pleasantries had no place in a war, especially when the opponent did not fight within the norms of democracy and civility.[11]

Large sections of the Naxal movement began to question Majumdar's leadership. In 1971 the CPI(ML) was split, as the Satyanarayan Singhrevolted against Majumdar's leadership. In 1972 Majumdar was arrested by the police and died in Alipore Jail. His death accelerated the fragmentation of the movement.

[edit]Reasons for failure, 1967-1975.

In a methodical study, Dr. Sailen Debnath has surmised the consequences and reasons of failures of the Naxalite Movement organised by Charu Majumdar and Kanu Sanyal. He writes "The Naxalite movement, though continued intensively from 1967 to the middle of 1970s and resurfaced after some years, could not go a long way achieving anything commendable because of the following reasons:-

1. The Naxalites wanted to surround the towns and cities by the villages, i.e. they wanted to encircle the urban centres with organized peasant forces of the villages. If the peasant militia could have occupied the cities, according to Majumdar, the so-called bourgeois government would fall making the passage to the coming of a socialist government; but the Naxalites could not and did not come up to a stage capable of organizing the peasants and thereby encircling the towns.
2. Majumdar gave sole importance to secret organization and armed training of its members for the purpose of eliminating the class enemies. As the Naxalites did not have mass level organization, they lacked mass support. Only with select few armed elements not properly educated in political line no big thing could be done.
3. "Khatam" or the action of eliminating the so-called class enemies in villages was a wrong principle of political mobilization by individual murder of select few people whose political class- character was never adjudged by their socio-economic conditions, and the properties they possessed, but very often only by their political affiliation or by the name and colour of the party or parties they directly or indirectly belonged to for a long or a short period of time. For example, in Jalpaiguri and Alipurduar they killed some petty jotdars who otherwise could have been comrades in action against the capitalists or could be friends in a revolution for radical change.
4. Recruitment in the Naxalite party was never done on proper judgment and scrutiny of the political characters and behaviours of the recruits. It so happened that many people only to feast on their animosities with their personal enemies got recruited in the Naxalite party only to utilize the help of the Naxalites to have their personal enemies in the neighbourhood killed on the basis of pseudo-identification of them as class enemies.
5. In many cases, dreaded criminals too enrolled in the Naxalite party with the aim of getting fire arms and to train themselves in the manufacture and use of fire arms. Thus very soon the party turned into an organization of professional criminal outfits who soon deserted the party after obtaining training or weapons. Many of these armed criminals soon began to carry out armed robberies. In many cases, they also informed the police about the hidden training centres of the Naxalites so as to avoid becoming victims of the Naxalites' targets as approvers in favour of the government..
6. The ruling Congress party inserted spies inside the unguarded and porous Naxalite organization to gather information about its secret bases and arrest its supporters. Government intelligence personnel and police disguised as Naxalite sympathizers got into the party's inner organization and rounded most of its leaders including Charu Majumdar into the jail. Thus police had information about the movements of Majumdar after he had gone underground in 1970, and he was arrested in Calcutta in July, 1972. He died in jail days after his arrest, probably in the night of 27th or 28th of July. It is not known how he died, although the government reported that he died ofheart attack.
7. Ordinary people in villages were terrified at the brutal and gruesome ways they killed the fellow villagers vilifying them as class enemies. As for example, at Bholardabri in Alipurduar they killed Rajen Pandit who was a refugee from East Pakistan and arduously was running a family of 12 dependents. By any means he was no class enemy at all. In another case they killed a person, chopped his head off the torso and hanged the head and the torso down the branches of trees with ropes in two separate places, the horrible sights of which cast a gloom on the faces of bemoaning villagers. After that, Naxalites could count no support from the villagers.

[edit]Lalgarh violence

In late May, 2009 in Lalgarh, West Bengal the Naxalites briefly threw out the local police and staged attacks against the ruling communist government. The region came under assault by Maoist guerrillas. The state government initiated a successful operation, with central paramilitary forces and state armed police, to retake Lalgarh in early June. Maoist leader Kishenji claimed in an interview that the mass Naxalite movement in Lalgarh in 2009 was aimed at creating a "liberated zone" against "oppression of the establishment Left and its police". He stated this had given the Naxalites a major base in West Bengal for the first time since the Naxalite uprising in the mid-1970s and that "We will have an armed movement going in Calcutta by 2011".[19]

[edit]Cultural references

The British musical group Asian Dub Foundation have a song called "Naxalite", which is featured on the soundtrack to the 1999 film Brokedown Palace. A 2005 movie called Hazaaron Khwaishein Aisi, directed by Sudhir Mishra, was set against the backdrop of the Naxalite movement. In August 2008, Kabeer Kaushik's Chamku, starring Bobby Deol and Priyanka Chopra, explored the story of a boy who isbrainwashed to take arms against the state.

In the novel English August by Upamanyu Chatterjee, there is reference to Naxal cadres whom the main protagonist, an IAS officer meets while visiting a tribal village in mid-1980's.

In the novel The God of Small Things by Arundhati Roy, there is a reference to a character joining the Naxalites.

In the novel The White Tiger by Aravind Adiga, the Naxals (sic) are mentioned often by the poor and the rich alike.

In the novel A Fine Balance by Rohinton Mistry, the character Omprakash makes and allusion to fighting "like the Naxalites" (195).

The 1998 film Hazaar Chaurasi Ki Maa (Mother of 1084), based on the novel, Hazar Churashir Maa[20] by Mahasweta Devi) starring Jaya Bachchan gives a very sympathetic portrayal of a Naxalbari militant killed by the state. The 2009 Malayalam movie Thalappavu portrays the story of Naxal Varghese, who was shot allegedly dead by the police during the 70s.

In the Kannada movie Veerappa NayakaVishnuvardhan portrays a Gandhian whose son becomes a Naxalite. The 2007 Kannada movieMaathaad Maathaadu Mallige, again portrays Vishnuvardhan as a Gandhian, who confronts a Naxalite Sudeep and shows him that the ways adopted by Naxals will only lead to violence and will not achieve their objective.

Eka Nakshalwadya Cha Janma, (Marathi: The birth of a Naxal), a novel written by Vilas Balkrishna Manohar, a volunteer with the Lok Biradari Prakalp, is a fictional account of a Madia Gond Juru's unwilling journey of life his metamorphosis from an exploited nameless tribal to a Naxal.[21]

[edit]See also

[edit]References

  1. ^ http://www.mha.nic.in/uniquepage.asp?id_pk=292
  2. ^http://www.satp.org/satporgtp/countries/india/maoist/terrorist_outfits/Janashakti.htm
  3. ^http://www.satp.org/satporgtp/countries/india/maoist/terrorist_outfits/PWG.htm
  4. ^ Ramakrishnan, Venkitesh (2005-09-21). "The Naxalite Challenge". Frontline Magazine (The Hindu). Retrieved 2007-03-15.
  5. ^ Handoo, Ashook. "Naxal Problem needs a holistic approach". Press Information Bureau. Retrieved 2009-08-08.
  6. a b "Rising Maoists Insurgency in India". Global Politician. 2007-01-15. Retrieved 2009-03-17.
  7. a b Philip Bowring Published: TUESDAY, APRIL 18, 2006 (2006-04-18). "Maoists who menace India". International Herald Tribune. Retrieved 2009-03-17.
  8. ^ "South Asia | Senior Maoist 'arrested' in India". BBC News. 2007-12-19. Retrieved 2009-03-17.
  9. ^ Co-ordinated operations to flush out Naxalites soon The Economic Times, February 6, 2009.
  10. ^ {Sunil Kumar Sen} ({1982}). {Peasant movements in India: mid-nineteenth and twentieth centuries}. {K.P. Bagchi}.
  11. a b Diwanji, A. K. (2003-10-02). "Primer: Who are the Naxalites?"Rediff.com. Retrieved 2007-03-15.
  12. ^ Hindustan Times: History of Naxalism
  13. ^ Singh, Prakash. The Naxalite Movement in IndiaNew Delhi: Rupa & Co., 1999. p. 101.
  14. ^ Quoted in Judith Vidal-Hall, "Naxalites", p. 73–75 in Index on Censorship, Volume 35, Number 4 (2006). Quoted on p. 74.
  15. ^ Judith Vidal-Hall, "Naxalites", p. 73–75 in Index on Censorship, Volume 35, Number 4 (2006). p. 74.
  16. ^ "Indian police killed by Maoists". Al Jazeera. April 6, 2010.
  17. ^ "74 security men killed by Naxals in Chhattisgarh". Ndtv.com. 2010-04-06. Retrieved 2010-04-12.
  18. ^ Judith Vidal-Hall, "Naxalites", p. 73–75 in Index on Censorship, Volume 35, Number 4 (2006). p. 73.
  19. ^ "Rising ambitions of India's Maoists"BBC News. 2009-07-02. Retrieved 2010-05-20.
  20. ^ "Mother of 1084" - the number assigned to her son.
  21. ^ Who's who of Indian Writers, 1999 By K. C. Dutt, Sahitya Akademi. Books.google.com. Retrieved 2009-03-17.

[edit]Further reading

  • Naxalite Politics in India, by J. C. Johari, Institute of Constitutional and Parliamentary Studies, New Delhi, . Published by Research Publications, 1972.
  • The Naxalite Movement, by Biplab Dasgupta. Published by , 1974.
  • The Naxalite Movement: A Maoist Experiment, by Sankar Ghosh. Published by Firma K.L. Mukhopadhyay, 1975. ISBN 0883865688.
  • The Naxalite Movement in India: Origin and Failure of the Maoist Revolutionary Strategy in West Bengal, 1967-1971, by Sohail Jawaid. Published by Associated Pub. House, 1979.
  • In the Wake of Naxalbari: A History of the Naxalite Movement in India, by Sumanta Banerjee. Published by Subarnarekha, 1980.
  • India's Simmering Revolution: The Naxalite Uprising, by Sumanta Banerjee. Published by Zed Books, 1984. ISBN 0862320372.
  • Tribal Guerrillas: The Santals of West Bengal and the Naxalite Movement, by Edward Duyker. Published by Oxford University Press, 1987.
  • The Naxalite Movement in India, by Prakash Singh. Published by Rupa, 1995. ISBN 8171672949.
  • Sailen Debnath, West Bengal in Doldrums, ISBN 9788186860342
  • Sailen Debnath, The Dooars in Historical Transition, ISBN 9788186860441
  • Sailen Debnath ed. Social and Political Tensions in North Bengal Since 1947,ISBN 81-86860-23-1

[edit]External links

CategoriesGovernment of India designated terrorist organizations | Maoism | Guerrilla organizations | Politics of India | Naxalite-Maoist insurgency | Land rights movements | Far-left politics in India | 1967 establishments in India 


No comments: